본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Q 방법론을 활용한 언어 구조 인지 패턴과 한국어 언어 유형 연구

A Study on the Cognition Patterns of the Language Frame and the Korean Language Typology Using Q Methodology

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates the typology of the Korean language according to the cognitive role of semantic components in a sentence. In order to carry out this research, Q methodology is adopted, which can allow us to measure human subjectivity. Although Korean is classified as a verb- framed language by many scholars, a lot of Koreans are authentically using Korean as a satellite-frame. There are four types of cognition patterns about the role of semantic language components. Both Types 1 and 3 are verb-framed languages, and they are divided again by the semantic component of the co-events, CAUSE or MANNER. Type 2 accepts only sentences in which MANNER exists regardless of the language frameworks of the sentence. That is, both frames are used in Type 2. Finally, Type 4 accepts only satellite-framed sentences, as opposed to Types 1 and 3.

Abstract

This paper investigates the typology of the Korean language according to the cognitive role of semantic components in a sentence. In order to carry out this research, Q methodology is adopted, which can allow us to measure human subjectivity. Although Korean is classified as a verb- framed language by many scholars, a lot of Koreans are authentically using Korean as a satellite-frame. There are four types of cognition patterns about the role of semantic language components. Both Types 1 and 3 are verb-framed languages, and they are divided again by the semantic component of the co-events, CAUSE or MANNER. Type 2 accepts only sentences in which MANNER exists regardless of the language frameworks of the sentence. That is, both frames are used in Type 2. Finally, Type 4 accepts only satellite-framed sentences, as opposed to Types 1 and 3.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김홍규, "방법론의 유용성 연구", 주관성 연구, 1, pp.15~33 (1996)
  2. 김홍규, "Q방법론: 과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용" (2008), 커뮤니케이션북스
  3. Choi, Soonja, "Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean: The Influence of Language Specific Lexicalization Patterns", Cognition, 41, pp.83~121 (1991)
  4. Hohenstein, Jill, "Is He Floating Across or Crossing Afloat? Cross-Influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish-English Bilingual Adults", Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(3), pp.249~261 (2006)
  5. Im, Sungchool, "Typological Patterns of Motion Verbs in Korean", Ph.D, pp.2001
  6. 임성출, "Lexicalization Patterns of Motion Events in Korean Revisited: With a Focus on Path Realization", 언어과학연구, (87), pp.457~475 (2018), 언어과학회[DOI]
  7. 이성용, "Directed Motion Constructions in Korean and Its Typological Category", 현대영미어문학, 36(3), pp.239~264 (2018), 현대영미어문학회[DOI]
  8. Slobin, Dan I., "Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning", pp.195~217 (1996), Oxford University Press
  9. Slobin, Dan I., "Typological and Contextual Perspectives, vol. 2", pp.219~257 (2004), Lawrence Elbaum Associates
  10. Slobin, Dan I, "Outside-In―Inside-Out (Iconicity in Language and Literature)", pp.307~322 (2005), John Benjamins
  11. Slobin, Dan I., "Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages: Typological Considerations", Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS), 20, pp.487~505 (1994)[DOI]
  12. Stephenson, William, "Technique of Factor Analysis", Nature, 136(3434), pp.297~297 (1935)
  13. Talmy, Leonard, "Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3 (Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon)", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  14. Talmy, Leonard, "Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation", Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1991), Berkeley Linguistics Society
  15. Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 1 (Concept Structuring Systems)" (2000), MIT Press
  16. Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics, vol. 2 (Typology and process in Concept Structuring)" (2000), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)