본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Crossover and Intervention in Covert Syntax

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper focuses on the contrast between (canonical) Intervention Effects and Covert Crossover with respect to specificity. The two phenomena are not separate but one phenomenon involved in “featural intervention.” The result of the featural interaction between a potential intervener and an element that needs to be licensed determines how (in)felicitous the relevant sentence is. With this unified tool, canonical intervention structures will be classified as ‘Weak' Intervention Effects since the intervention effect can be canceled by specificity, whereas Covert Crossover will be classified as ‘Strong' Intervention Effects since co-indexed elements always block the LF-movement of their index sharer in terms of the identical feature sharing. In this argument, we can capture an important fact: Covert Crossover is not an exceptional case of specificity effects but a strong case of intervention effects.

Abstract

This paper focuses on the contrast between (canonical) Intervention Effects and Covert Crossover with respect to specificity. The two phenomena are not separate but one phenomenon involved in “featural intervention.” The result of the featural interaction between a potential intervener and an element that needs to be licensed determines how (in)felicitous the relevant sentence is. With this unified tool, canonical intervention structures will be classified as ‘Weak' Intervention Effects since the intervention effect can be canceled by specificity, whereas Covert Crossover will be classified as ‘Strong' Intervention Effects since co-indexed elements always block the LF-movement of their index sharer in terms of the identical feature sharing. In this argument, we can capture an important fact: Covert Crossover is not an exceptional case of specificity effects but a strong case of intervention effects.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Agüero-Bautista, Calixto, "Team Weak Crossover", Inquiry, 43(1), pp.1~43 (2012)
  2. Beck, Sigrid, "Quantified Structures as Barriers For LF Movement", Natural Language Semantics, 4(1), pp.1~56 (1996)
  3. Beck, Sigrid, "Intervention Effects Follow From Focus Interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 14(1), pp.1~56 (2006)
  4. Beck, Sigrid, "Wh- and Operator Scope In Korean", Journal Of East Asian Linguistics, 6, pp.339~384 (1997)
  5. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, "Wh-in-Situ, from the 1980s to Now", Language And Linguistics Compass, 3(3), pp.767~791 (2009)
  6. Enç, Mürvet, "The Semantics Of Specificity", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.1~25 (1991)
  7. Falco, Michelangelo, "Coreference, Modality and Focus", pp.19~44 (2007), John Benjamins
  8. Fox, Danny, "Economy and Scope", Natural Language Semantics, 3(3), pp.283~341 (1995)
  9. Fox, Danny, "Economy And Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  10. Ha, Iljoo, "Specificity And Intervention Effects In Korean", WIGL, 4, pp.21~31 (2004), University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Linguistics
  11. Higginbotham, James, "Pronouns And Bound Variables", Linguistic Inquiry, 11, pp.679~708 (1980)
  12. Jegal, Min, "Crossover, Intervention and Specificity Effects", Ph.D, pp.2016
  13. Kim, Shin-Sook, "Harvard Studies In Korean Linguistics, vol 6", pp.520~533 (2002), Hankumunhwasa
  14. Kiss, Katalin E., "Wh-Movement and Specificity", Natural Language And Linguistic Theory, 11(1), pp.85~120 (1993)
  15. Koopman, Hilda, "Variables and the Bijection Principle", The Linguistic Review, 2(2), pp.139~160 (1982)
  16. Kotek, Hadas, "Intervention out of Islands" (2013), MIT
  17. Lasnik, Howard, "Move Alpha" (1992), MIT Press
  18. Lee, Gunsoo, "From Referentiality to Syntactic Dependencies", Ph.D, pp.1996
  19. Pesetsky, David, "The Representation of (in)Definiteness", pp.98~129 (1987), MIT Press
  20. Pesetsky, David, "Phrasal Movement and Its Kin" (2000), MIT Press
  21. Reinhart, Tanya, "Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation" (1983), Croom Helm
  22. Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" (1990), MIT Press
  23. Rizzi, Luigi, "Locality", Lingua, 130, pp.169~186 (2013)
  24. Safir, Ken, "The syntax of (in)Dependence" (2004), MIT press
  25. Son, Gwangrak, "Scrambling, Reconstruction, and the Checking Principle", Ph.D, pp.2001
  26. Villata, Sandra, "Effects And Relativized Minimality: New Experimental Evidence From Graded Judgments", Lingua, 179, pp.76~96 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)