본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가하천변 생태관광 네트워크 10선

“Ecoturism Networks 10”around the Areas Bordering National Rivers in South Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

To select 10 representatives for the ecotourism networks around the areas bordering national rivers in Korea, the spatial ranges for ecotourism have been established, the ecotourism potential analyzed, and the ecotourism resources information collected by the Regional Environmental Offices and the Korea National Park Service has undergone reviews,amendments, supplements, and verification processes through familiarization tour previews,and the following main results have been derived. First, the spatial ranges of the eco-tourism networks have been set as the watershed areas that include areas around the four major rivers and the rivers. Second, the areas with high potential value for ecotourism were selected through the analysis of ecotourism potential. Since EGIS was used for the analysis, it was inevitable that insufficient amount of localized information was reflected, and the use of the results as reference for the potential would be feasible. Third, it was possible, by reviewing, amending and complementing the results of ecological resource information collected by the Regional Environmental Offices and the Korea National Park Service, to select 50 representative ecological resources around the national rivers. The selected resources were considered for the adjacency, attractiveness of ecological resources, and uniqueness of the national rivers, and they were derived by screening expert advice, official opinion, and geographical analysis information. Fourth, 10 representative ecotourism networks based on watershed areas were selected, and suitable themes were given based on the resource characteristics. Fifth, the appropriateness for ecotourism has been confirmed, with the familiarization tour previews andsurvey results, preservation of the future ecotourism resources, and the establishment of the foundation as the basis. In the future, the remaining 9 ecotourism networks would also need to undergo a verification process such as familiarization tours. It is deemed that, through future ecotourism contests, if the programs that select locally-pioneered tourism programs resulting from the capacities of local entities and residents, then it would be more effective in discovering resources that are more localized and of higher regional value.

Abstract

To select 10 representatives for the ecotourism networks around the areas bordering national rivers in Korea, the spatial ranges for ecotourism have been established, the ecotourism potential analyzed, and the ecotourism resources information collected by the Regional Environmental Offices and the Korea National Park Service has undergone reviews,amendments, supplements, and verification processes through familiarization tour previews,and the following main results have been derived. First, the spatial ranges of the eco-tourism networks have been set as the watershed areas that include areas around the four major rivers and the rivers. Second, the areas with high potential value for ecotourism were selected through the analysis of ecotourism potential. Since EGIS was used for the analysis, it was inevitable that insufficient amount of localized information was reflected, and the use of the results as reference for the potential would be feasible. Third, it was possible, by reviewing, amending and complementing the results of ecological resource information collected by the Regional Environmental Offices and the Korea National Park Service, to select 50 representative ecological resources around the national rivers. The selected resources were considered for the adjacency, attractiveness of ecological resources, and uniqueness of the national rivers, and they were derived by screening expert advice, official opinion, and geographical analysis information. Fourth, 10 representative ecotourism networks based on watershed areas were selected, and suitable themes were given based on the resource characteristics. Fifth, the appropriateness for ecotourism has been confirmed, with the familiarization tour previews andsurvey results, preservation of the future ecotourism resources, and the establishment of the foundation as the basis. In the future, the remaining 9 ecotourism networks would also need to undergo a verification process such as familiarization tours. It is deemed that, through future ecotourism contests, if the programs that select locally-pioneered tourism programs resulting from the capacities of local entities and residents, then it would be more effective in discovering resources that are more localized and of higher regional value.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 강신겸, "생태관광 시설 및 활동 프로그램", 환경과 조경, 125, pp.138~143 (1999)
  2. 김귀곤, "교육·문화공간으로서의 국립공원및 보호지역의 EcoTourism화의 실제", 국립공원협회 제15회 자연공원 세미나 자료집, pp.54~55 (1994)
  3. 박석희, "생태관광의 필요성과 유형", 환경과조경, 125, pp.128~131 (1998)
  4. 양병이, "한국의 생태관광 여건과 전망" (2001), 녹색연합
  5. 유주한, "자연자원 보전지역의 평가모형 - 내셔널 트러스트 후보지 선정을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 30(2), pp.39~49 (2002), 한국조경학회
  6. 윤여창, "지속가능한산지개발을 위한 환경기준 설정에 관한 연구", 한국환경영향평가학회지, 8(2), pp.53~63 (1999)
  7. 이관규, "도시 및 지역의 생태관광지 선정을 위한 공간의사결정지원 평가모델", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 12(2), pp.50~60 (2009), 한국환경복원기술학회
  8. 이관규, "4대강 생태관광 잠재구역 설정", 2009 한일 GIS 국제 심포지움 및 KAGIS 추계학술대회, pp.103~104 (2009), 한국지리정보학회
  9. 이태희, "관광산업발전론-한국관광선진화의과제" (1996), 일신사
  10. 환경부, "생태관광분야 정책", 자연정책과 내부자료, ~ (2009)
  11. Boyd, S. W, "Managing ecotourism: an opportunity spectrum approach", Tourism Management, 7(8), pp.557~566 (1996)
  12. Carter, E., "Ecotourism Alternative" (1995), Univ. of Pennsylvania Press
  13. Tourism, Ecotourism, and Protected Areas, "Ceballos-Lascurain, H", IUCN, ~ (1996)
  14. Egoh, B, "Integrating ecosystem services into con- servation assessments: A review", Ecological Economics, 63(4), pp.714~721 (2007)
  15. Fennell, D. A, "Ecotourism: an Introduction" (1999), Routledge
  16. Gilbert, J, "Ecotourism Means Business" (1997), GP Publications
  17. Gulinck, H, "Landscape as framework for intergration local subsistence and ecotourism: a case study in Zimbabew", Landscape and Urban Planning, 53, pp.173~182 (2001)
  18. Priskin, J., "Assessment of natural resources for nature-based tourism: the case of the Central Coast Region of Western Australia", Toursism Management, 22, pp.637~648 (2001)
  19. Strasdas, W, "Ecotourism manual for protected area managers", 2002 세계 생 태관광 총회(World Ecotourism Summit) 선언과 발표 자료집, pp.112~133 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)