전국자연환경조사 자료를 이용한 종분포모형 연구
A Study on the Species Distribution Modeling using National Ecosystem Survey Data
2
조회
0
다운로드
43
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Ministry of Environment have started the ‘National Ecosystem Survey’ since 1986. It has been carried out nationwide every ten years as the largest survey project in Korea. The second one and the third one produced the GIS-based inventory of species. Three survey methods were different from each other. There were few studies for species distribution using national survey data in Korea. The purposes of this study are to test species distribution models for finding the most suitable modeling methods for the National Ecosystem Survey data and to investigate the modeling results according to survey methods and taxonominal group. Occurrence data of nine species were extracted from the National Ecosystem Survey by taxonomical group (plant, mammal, and bird). Plants are Korean winter hazel (Corylopsis coreana), Iris odaesanensis (Iris odaesanensis), and Berchemia (Berchemia berchemiaefolia). Mammals are Korean Goral (Nemorhaedus goral), Marten (Martes flavigula koreana), and Leopard cat (Felis bengalensis). Birds are Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius), Eagle Owl (Bubo Bubo), and Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). Environmental variables consisted of climate, topography, soil and vegetation structure. Two modeling methods (GAM, Maxent) were tested across nine species, and predictive species maps of target species were produced. The results of this study were as follows. Firstly, Maxent showed similar 5 cross-validated AUC with GAM. Maxent is more useful model to develop than GAM because National Ecosystem Survey data has presence-only data. Therefore, Maxent is more useful species distribution model for National Ecosystem Survey data. Secondly, the modeling results between the second and third survey methods showed sometimes different because of each different surveying methods. Therefore, we need to combine two data for producing a reasonable result. Lastly, modeling result showed different predicted distribution pattern by taxonominal group. These results should be considered if we want to develop a species distribution model using the National Ecosystem Survey and apply it to a nationwide biodiversity research.
Abstract
The Ministry of Environment have started the ‘National Ecosystem Survey’ since 1986. It has been carried out nationwide every ten years as the largest survey project in Korea. The second one and the third one produced the GIS-based inventory of species. Three survey methods were different from each other. There were few studies for species distribution using national survey data in Korea. The purposes of this study are to test species distribution models for finding the most suitable modeling methods for the National Ecosystem Survey data and to investigate the modeling results according to survey methods and taxonominal group. Occurrence data of nine species were extracted from the National Ecosystem Survey by taxonomical group (plant, mammal, and bird). Plants are Korean winter hazel (Corylopsis coreana), Iris odaesanensis (Iris odaesanensis), and Berchemia (Berchemia berchemiaefolia). Mammals are Korean Goral (Nemorhaedus goral), Marten (Martes flavigula koreana), and Leopard cat (Felis bengalensis). Birds are Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius), Eagle Owl (Bubo Bubo), and Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). Environmental variables consisted of climate, topography, soil and vegetation structure. Two modeling methods (GAM, Maxent) were tested across nine species, and predictive species maps of target species were produced. The results of this study were as follows. Firstly, Maxent showed similar 5 cross-validated AUC with GAM. Maxent is more useful model to develop than GAM because National Ecosystem Survey data has presence-only data. Therefore, Maxent is more useful species distribution model for National Ecosystem Survey data. Secondly, the modeling results between the second and third survey methods showed sometimes different because of each different surveying methods. Therefore, we need to combine two data for producing a reasonable result. Lastly, modeling result showed different predicted distribution pattern by taxonominal group. These results should be considered if we want to develop a species distribution model using the National Ecosystem Survey and apply it to a nationwide biodiversity research.
참고문헌 (50)
- 국립환경과학원, "자연환경조사는 왜 하는가" (2003), 국립환경과학원
- 권혁수, "보호지역계획을 위한 생물다양성 통합평가모형 : 지리산과 덕유산, 가야산 권역을 대상으로", 박사, pp.2011
- 김지연, "전국자연환경조사 결과를 활용한 종분포모델링 연구(Ⅰ)," (2010), 국립환경과학원
- 희귀식물, 히어리 생태에 관한 연구, "김휘", 서울대학교수목원, 44~56, pp.연구보고, 18 (1988)
- 노일, "히어리 군락의 입지특성과 식생구조 분석", 농업생명과학연구, 38(2), pp.41~51 (2004)
- 문현식, "전남 곡성지역 히어리 군락의 입지환경 및 식생구조", 한국농림기상학회지, 6(3), pp.196~203 (2004), 한국농림기상학회
- 서창완, "위치자료의 종류에 따른 생물종 분포모형 비교 연구", 한국지형공간정보학회지, 16(4), pp.59~64 (2008), 한국지형공간정보학회
- 원병오, "한국동식물도감" (1981), 문교부
- 이동근, "삵의 서식지 적합성 평가를 위한 분석단위 설정 및 보전지역 선정 - 충청도 지역을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 36(5), pp.64~72 (2008), 한국조경학회
- 이우신, "야생동물 생태 관리학" (2010), 라이프사이언스
- 이장호, "까막딱다구리(Dryocopus martius)의 서식지 이용 특성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 이정환, "한국 특산히어리 군락의 식생구조와 맹아지 동태", 한국환경생태학회지, 13(3), pp.280~287 (1999)
- 임동옥, "보호종인 히어리의 자생지내외 보전과 지역사회 협력 모델 개발 Ⅰ. 히어리 분포지 특성에 관한 연구", 한국환경생태학회지, 19(2), pp.162~176 (2005), 한국환경생태학회
- 임동옥, "히어리" (2011), 광일문화사
- 장형태, "히어리(Corylopsis coreana) 개체군의 식생과 토양특성", 한국환경생태학회지, 22(6), pp.609~615 (2008), 한국환경생태학회
- 최창용, "서로 다른 환경에서 서식하는 수리부엉이(Bubo bubo)의 먹이 이용", 한국환경생태학회지, 21(1), pp.30~37 (2007), 한국환경생태학회
- 최태영, "설악산국립공원내 산양(Nemorhaedus Caudatus Raddeanus)의 잠재 서식지 적합성 모형; 다기준평가기법(MCE)과 퍼지집합(Fuzzy Set)의 도입을 통하여", 한국조경학회지, 32(4), pp.28~38 (2004), 한국조경학회
- 환경부, "제2차 전국자연환경조사 지침", 환경부, ~ (1997)
- 멸종위기야생동식물 보고서, "환경부", 환경부, ~ (2005)
- 환경부, "제3차 전국자연환경조사 지침", 환경부, ~ (2006)
- 보호종인 히어리의 자생지내외 보전과 지역사회 협력 모델 개발, "환경부", 환경부, ~ (2007)
- Anon, "S-plus 2000 Guide to Statistics" (1999), MathSoft
- Baldwin, R. A, "Use of Maximum Entropy Modeling in Wildlife Research", Entropy, 11, pp.854~866 (2009)
- Beazley, K, "Biodiversity considerations in conservation system planning: Map-based approach for Nova Scotia", Ecological Applications, 15, pp.2192~2208 (2005)
- Condit, R, "Tropical tree a-diversity: Results from a worldwide network of large plots", Biologiske Skrifter, 55, pp.565~582 (2005)
- del Barrio, G, "Integrating multiple modelling approaches to predict the potential impacts of climate change on species’ distributions in contrasting regions: comparison and implications for policy", Environmental Science and Policy, 9(2), pp.129~147 (2006)
- Elith, J., "Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data", Ecography, 29(2), pp.129~151 (2006)
- Ferrier, S., "Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here?", Systematic Biology, 51(2), pp.331~363 (2002)
- Franklin, J, "Mapping species distributions spatial inference and prediction" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Gramendia, A, "Forest management considerationsfor conservation of Black WoodpeckerDryocopus martius and White-backedWoodpecker Dendrocopos leucotospopulations in Quinto Real (SpanishWestern Pyrenees)", Biodiversity andConservation, 15, pp.1399~1415 (2006)
- Huntley, B, "The performance of modelsrelating species geographical distributionsto climate is independent of trophiclevel", Ecology letters, 7, pp.417~426 (2004)
- Kremen, C., "Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resoultion planning tools", Science, 320(5873), pp.222~226 (2008)
- Li W, "Designing the core zone in a biosphere reserve based on suitable habitats: Yancheng Biosphere Reserve and the red crowned crane (Grus japonensis)", Biological Conservation, 90(3), pp.167~173 (1999)
- Margules, C. R, "Systematic conservation planning", Nature, 405(6783), pp.243~253 (2000)
- Seo, C, "Scale effects in species distribution models: implications for conservation planning under climate change", Biology Letters, 5(1), pp.39~43 (2009)
- Manel, S., "Evaulating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence", Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, pp.921~931 (2001)
- Mike, A, "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches", Ecological modeling, 200(1), pp.1~19 (2007)
- Myers, N, "Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities", Nature, pp.853~858 (2000)
- Swets, J. A, "Measures of the accuracy of diagnostic systems", Science, 240, pp.1285~1293 (1998)
- Pearson, R. G, "SPECIES: A spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species", Ecological modeling, 154(3), pp.289~300 (2002)
- Pearson, R. G, "Predicting species distribution from small numbers of occurrencerecords: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar", Journal of Biogeography, 34(1), pp.102~117 (2007)
- Phillips, S. J, "Maximum entropy modeling ofspecies geographic distributions", Ecological Modelling, 190, pp.231~259 (2006)
- Primack, R., B, "A primer of conservation biology" (2004), Sinauer
- Regan, H. M, "Comprehensive criteria for biodiversity evaluation in conservation planning", Biodiversity Conservation, 16, pp.2715~2728 (2007)
- Rodrigues, A. S. L., "Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity", Nature, 428(6983), pp.640~643 (2004)
- Scott, J. M, "Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity", Wildlife Monographs, 123, pp.3~41 (1993)
- Thorn, J. S. V, "Ecological niche modelling as a technique for assessing threats and setting conservation priorities for Asian slow lorises (Primates:Nycticebus)", Diversity and Distributions, 15(2), pp.289~298 (2009)
- Thuiller, W, "BIOMOD: optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change", Global Change Biology, 9(10), pp.1353~1362 (2003)
- Woodward, F. I., "Climate and plant distribution at global and local scale", Vegetatio, 69(3), pp.189~197 (1987)
- World Resources Institute, "World Resources 1994-1995: A Guide to the Global Environment" (1994), Oxford University Press