본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

증촌 도랑의 생태환경 조사와 평가

Preliminary Ecological Environmental Assessments of a Brooklet in Jeungchon

안광국|한정호
한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment)|2012.12|환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)|제21권 제6호|pp. 841-857

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Fishenvironmental impact assessmentEcological healthBrookletChemical qualityPhysical habitat
주제분류환경공학

초록

Preliminary ecological environmental assessments including physico-chemical constituents, water quality, fish fauna analysis, physical habitat health, and ecological health assessment were conducted as a primary step for Jeungchon micro-habitat ecosystem restoration in 2012. Water chemistry analysis of conductivity, dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll-a and etc. indicated that there were no significant differences(p < 0.05) among 6 sites between the headwaters and downstream. Multi-metric model analysis of Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index(QHEI) showed that brooklets were at “good condition” as a mean QHEI of 158.7(n = 6) and the longitudinal differences of the model values between the sites were minor(QHEI range: 153 - 165). Total fish species and the number of individuals were 12 and 481, respectively, and dominant species were Zacco platypus(49.5%) and Zacco koreanus(36.8%). Tolerance guild analysis showed that the proportion of sensitive species(SS) had a negative linear function[SS = 86.35 - 0.31(DH); R2 = 0.892, p < 0.01] with a distance from the headwaters, while the proportion of tolerant species(TS) had a positive linear function(R2 = 0.950, F = 90.28, p < 0.001) with the distance. Trophic feeding guild analysis showed that the proportion of insectivore species(IS) had a negative linear function(R2 = 0.934, p < 0.01) with a distance from the headwaters, while the proportion of omnivore species(OS) had a positive linear function(R2 = 0.958, p < 0.001) with the distance. Index of Biological Integrity(IBI) model, based on fish assemblages, showed a “fair condition” as a mean IBI of 23(n = 6), and there was a distinct differences of ecological health between the headwaters(S1 = 30; “good condition”) and the downstreams(S6 = 14; “poor condition”). Overall, the preliminary environmental impact assessments suggest that water quality, physical habitat conditions(QHEI model), and ecological health(IBI model) were maintained well, even if the state was not an excellent conditions.

Abstract

Preliminary ecological environmental assessments including physico-chemical constituents, water quality, fish fauna analysis, physical habitat health, and ecological health assessment were conducted as a primary step for Jeungchon micro-habitat ecosystem restoration in 2012. Water chemistry analysis of conductivity, dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll-a and etc. indicated that there were no significant differences(p < 0.05) among 6 sites between the headwaters and downstream. Multi-metric model analysis of Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index(QHEI) showed that brooklets were at “good condition” as a mean QHEI of 158.7(n = 6) and the longitudinal differences of the model values between the sites were minor(QHEI range: 153 - 165). Total fish species and the number of individuals were 12 and 481, respectively, and dominant species were Zacco platypus(49.5%) and Zacco koreanus(36.8%). Tolerance guild analysis showed that the proportion of sensitive species(SS) had a negative linear function[SS = 86.35 - 0.31(DH); R2 = 0.892, p < 0.01] with a distance from the headwaters, while the proportion of tolerant species(TS) had a positive linear function(R2 = 0.950, F = 90.28, p < 0.001) with the distance. Trophic feeding guild analysis showed that the proportion of insectivore species(IS) had a negative linear function(R2 = 0.934, p < 0.01) with a distance from the headwaters, while the proportion of omnivore species(OS) had a positive linear function(R2 = 0.958, p < 0.001) with the distance. Index of Biological Integrity(IBI) model, based on fish assemblages, showed a “fair condition” as a mean IBI of 23(n = 6), and there was a distinct differences of ecological health between the headwaters(S1 = 30; “good condition”) and the downstreams(S6 = 14; “poor condition”). Overall, the preliminary environmental impact assessments suggest that water quality, physical habitat conditions(QHEI model), and ecological health(IBI model) were maintained well, even if the state was not an excellent conditions.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 경상남도 도랑살리기 현황과 과제, "경남발전연구원", 1~18 (2011)
  2. 교육부, "한국동식물도감, In 제37권 동물편(담수어류)", pp.133~520 (1997), 교육부
  3. 수생태 건강성 회복을 위한하천복원 모델과 기준, 조사계획 수립 연구최종보고서(III): 수생태 건강성 조사계획 수립 및 지침, "국립환경과학원", 국립환경과학원, 37~46 (2007)
  4. 김익수, "원색 한국 어류도감", pp.1~478 (1993), 아카데미서적
  5. 김익수, "한국의 민물고기", pp.1~465 (2002), 교학사
  6. 문운기, "1차 소하천의 환경특성 및 어류군집", 생태와 환경, 40(1), pp.163~172 (2007), 한국하천호수학회
  7. 배대열, "다변수 메트릭 모델을 이용한 식장산 계곡천의 생태 건강성 평가", 한국물환경학회지, 24(2), pp.156~163 (2008), 한국물환경학회
  8. 손영목, "금강의 민물고기", pp.1~239 (2006), 지성사
  9. 안광국, "물리적 서식지평가기법 및 어류 다변수 평가모델에 의거한 대전천의 생태학적 건강도 진단", 생태와 환경, 38(3), pp.361~371 (2005), 한국하천호수학회
  10. 안광국, "우리나라 주요하천 수계에서 다변수모델을 이용한 생태학적 수환경 평가", 한국물환경학회지, 22(5), pp.796~804 (2006), 한국물환경학회
  11. 양인태, "GIS를 이용한 소하천 관리시스템 개발", 대한토목학회지, 21(1-D), pp.105~114 (2001)
  12. 이상훈, "소하천의 오염부하량이 수질에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국환경영향평가학회지, 10(1), pp.9~19 (2001)
  13. 田祥麟, "한국산 담수어의 분포에 관하여", 박사, pp.1980
  14. 정문기, "한국어도보", pp.1~727 (1977), 일지사
  15. 최기철, "한국의 민물고기", pp.1~50 (1989), 서문당
  16. 최기철, "원색 한국담수어 도감", pp.1~277 (1990), 향문사
  17. 최명재, "어류 모델 메트릭과 물리적 서식지 변수를 이용한 팔당호 유입하천 하류부의 하천건강성 평가", 생태와 환경, 42(3), pp.280~289 (2009), 한국하천호수학회
  18. 농촌지역 소하천의 건천화원인분석을 위한 실태 조사, "한국농어촌공사", 농어촌 연구원, 45~65 (2006)
  19. 수생태계 보호를위한 소하천 관리방안, "한국환경정책평가연구", 1~25 (2008)
  20. 2008년도 전국 도랑 살리기 실태조사 결과, "환경부", 환경부 수생태보전과, 1~6 (2008)
  21. 생태하천 복원사업 중장기 추진계획, "환경부", 환경부 수생태보전과, 1~27 (2010)
  22. 샛강, 실개천을 살리기 위한 1사 1하천 운동 협약식 계획, "환경부", 환경부 수생태보전과, 1~27 (2010)
  23. 우리마을 도랑살리기 범 국민운동 추진계획, "환경부", 낙동강유역환경청, 6~11 (2011)
  24. Alexander, R.B, "The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality", Journal of The American Water Resources Association, 43(1), pp.41~59 (2007)
  25. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition, "Barbour, M. T.", US. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 162~180, pp.EPA-841-B-99-002 (1999)
  26. Haigh, M.J., "Headwater deforestation: a challenge for environmental management", Global Environmental Change, 14, pp.51~61 (2004)
  27. Harding, J.S, "Persistence of a significantpopulation of rare Canterbury mudfish(Neochanna burrowsius) in a hydrologicallyisolated catchment", New zealand Journalof Marine and Freshwater Research, 41, pp.309~316 (2007)
  28. Harding, J.S, "Changes in agricultural intensity and river health along a river continuum", Freshwater Biology, 42(2), pp.345~357 (1999)
  29. Harris, J.H., "The use of fish in ecological assessments", Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, pp.65~80 (1995)
  30. Johnson, B.R, "Larval salamanders and channel geomorphology are indicators of hydrologic permanence in forested headwater streams", Ecological Indicator, 9(1), pp.150~159 (2008)
  31. Karr, J. R., "Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities", Fisheries, 6, pp.21~27 (1981)
  32. Assessing biological integrity in running water: Amethod and its rationale, In llinois National History Survey, Special Publication 5, "Karr, J. R.", 28~ (1986)
  33. Kusuda, S, "Upstreammigrating loach in the fishway for a rice paddy", Fish Water, 45, pp.19~22 (2009)
  34. Margalef, R, "Information theory in ecology", Generation System, 3, pp.36~71 (1958)
  35. Muotka, T, "Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: he role of enhanced leaf retention", Journal of Applied Ecology, 39(1), pp.145~156 (2002)
  36. Pielou, E.C, "Ecological diversity", pp.165~ (1975), Wiley
  37. Rapid assessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrats and fish, In Office of Water Regulations and Standards, "Plafkin, J.L", US EPA, ~, pp.EPA-444 (1989), 4-89-001
  38. Pozo, J., "Inputs of particulate organic matter to streams with different riparian vegetation", Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16(3), pp.602~611 (1997)
  39. Sanders, R. E., "The Use of external deformities, erosion, lesions, and tumors in fish assemblages for characterizing aquatic resources", pp.225~245 (1999), CRC Press
  40. Shannon, C.E, "The mathematical theory of communication" (1949), University of Illinois Press
  41. Simpson, E.H., "Measurement of diversity", Nature, 163(688) (1949)
  42. Technical support document for water quality-based toxic control, "US. EPA", US. EPA, Office of Water, 29~45, pp.EPA 505-2-90-001 (1991)
  43. Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters, In Environmental monitoring systems laboratory-Cincinnati office of modeling, monitoring systems, and quality assurance, "US. EPA", Office of Research Development, 128~198, pp.EPA-600-R-92-111 (1993)
  44. Wipfli, M.S, "Ecological linkages betweenheadwaters and downstream ecosystems:transport of organic matter, invertebrates,and wood down headwater channels", Journal of the American Water ResourcesAssociation, 43(1), pp.72~85 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

도심하천 생태계에서의 수질 및 생태건강성 평가김현맥, 안광국, 이재훈한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2008 · 제26권 제4호남한강 수계에서 하천차수에 따른 생태건강도 평가 및지점별 물리적 서식지 평가안광국, 최지웅한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2013 · 제31권 제4호원주천의 어류군집을 이용한 생태적 건강성 평가 연구박현경, 원경호, 이황구, 최준길한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2017 · 제35권 제4호주거단지 건설이 하천에 미치는 생태영향평가안광국, 이재훈, 한정호한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2012 · 제21권 제5호만경강 본류의 어류 트로픽 길드, 오염 내성도 및 다변수 생태건강도에 대한 화학적 수질영향나현희, 안광국, 이상재한국환경생물학회 · 환경생물2019 · 제37권 제1호금강수계에서 하상재료에 따른 어류의 종다양성 및 서식지 평가강경호, 강형식, 인동수, 장민호, 허준욱한국환경영향평가학회 · 환경영향평가2011 · 제20권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

국가환경시료은행 시료 채취, 분쇄, 저장과 개선방안 고찰이종천, 김명진, 바데 라빈드라, 이장호, 한아름, 이유진, 김민성pp. 823-839인공보의 어류생태영향 평가를 위한 Echo-sounder 모니터링 기법 적용한정호, 안광국, 이재훈, 임병진, 박종환, 최지웅pp. 859-877죽산보의 어도에서 트랩 샘플링 기법을 이용한 하절기, 일주기별 어류 이동성 평가한정호, 박종환, 안광국, 임병진, 고대근pp. 879-891항공기 소음모델의 정합성 평가를 통한 소음지도 작성임봉빈, 김주인, 김선태, 이규성, 홍현수pp. 893-901경관평가 기반 수변구역의 경관관리 전략 - 경안천 수변구역을 대상으로 -박창석, 배민기pp. 903-916
원문 보기