본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

도심하천 생태계에서의 수질 및 생태건강성 평가

Water Quality and Ecosystem Health Assessments in Urban Stream Ecosystems

4

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The objectives of the study were to analyze chemical water quality and physical habitat characteristics in the urban streams (Miho and Gap streams) along with evaluations of fish community structures and ecosystem health, throughout fish composition and guild analyses during 2006~2007. Concentrations of BOD and COD averaged 3.5 and 5.7 mg L-1, in the urban streams, while TN and TP averaged 5.1 mg L-1 and 274 μg L-1, indicating an eutrophic state. Especially, organic pollution and eutrophication were most intense in the downstream reach of both streams. Total number of fish was 34 species in the both streams, and the most abundant species was Zacco platypus (32~42% of the total). In both streams, the relative abundance of sensitive species was low (23%) and tolerant and omnivores were high (45%, 52%), indicating an typical tolerance and trophic guilds of urban streams in Korea. According to multi-metric models of Stream Ecosystem Health Assessments (SEHA), model values were 19 and 24 in Miho Stream and Gap Stream, respectively. Habitat analysis showed that QHEI (Qulatitative Habitat Evaluation Index) values were 123 and 135 in the two streams, respectively. The minimum values in the SEHA and QHEI were observed in the both downstreams, and this was mainly attributed to chemical pollutions, as shown in the water quality parameters. The model values of SEHA were strongly correlated with conductivity (r=- 0.530, p=0.016), BOD (r=- 0.578, p⁄0.01), COD (r=- 0.603, p⁄0.01), and nutrients (TN, TP: r¤0.40, p⁄0.05). This model applied in this study seems to be a useful tool, which could reflect the chemical water quality in the urban streams. Overall, this study suggests that consistent ecological monitoring is required in the urban streams for the conservations along with ecological restorations in the degradated downstrems.

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to analyze chemical water quality and physical habitat characteristics in the urban streams (Miho and Gap streams) along with evaluations of fish community structures and ecosystem health, throughout fish composition and guild analyses during 2006~2007. Concentrations of BOD and COD averaged 3.5 and 5.7 mg L-1, in the urban streams, while TN and TP averaged 5.1 mg L-1 and 274 μg L-1, indicating an eutrophic state. Especially, organic pollution and eutrophication were most intense in the downstream reach of both streams. Total number of fish was 34 species in the both streams, and the most abundant species was Zacco platypus (32~42% of the total). In both streams, the relative abundance of sensitive species was low (23%) and tolerant and omnivores were high (45%, 52%), indicating an typical tolerance and trophic guilds of urban streams in Korea. According to multi-metric models of Stream Ecosystem Health Assessments (SEHA), model values were 19 and 24 in Miho Stream and Gap Stream, respectively. Habitat analysis showed that QHEI (Qulatitative Habitat Evaluation Index) values were 123 and 135 in the two streams, respectively. The minimum values in the SEHA and QHEI were observed in the both downstreams, and this was mainly attributed to chemical pollutions, as shown in the water quality parameters. The model values of SEHA were strongly correlated with conductivity (r=- 0.530, p=0.016), BOD (r=- 0.578, p⁄0.01), COD (r=- 0.603, p⁄0.01), and nutrients (TN, TP: r¤0.40, p⁄0.05). This model applied in this study seems to be a useful tool, which could reflect the chemical water quality in the urban streams. Overall, this study suggests that consistent ecological monitoring is required in the urban streams for the conservations along with ecological restorations in the degradated downstrems.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 김익수, "한국의 민물고기" (2002), 교학사
  2. 김정수, "양재천에서 생태적 복원구간과 비복원구간에 서식하는 조류군집의 비교", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 8(4), pp.1~11 (2005), 한국환경복원기술학회
  3. 노준우, "오염총량제를 고려한 미호천의 장래 수질예측", 대한상하수도학회, 한국물환경학회 2007 공동추계학술발표회 논문집, pp.70~ (2007)
  4. 노준우, "GIS를 이용한 미호천의 장래수질예측", 한국지형공간정보학회지, 16(1), pp.13~21 (2008), 한국지형공간정보학회
  5. 류재홍, "미호천의 물 환경 탐구 - TOC를 중심으로 한 수질모니터링 -", 한국물환경학회지, 23(5), pp.731~739 (2007), 한국물환경학회
  6. 박재로, "대전천 유지유량 확보를 위한 방안 검토", 한국물환경학회, 대한상수도학회 공동춘계학술발표회 논문집, pp.C-11~ (2003)
  7. 서미진, "행정중심 복합도시(세종시)가 금강의 수질에 미치는 영향", 대한상하수도학회, 한국물환경학회 2007추계학술발표회 논문집, pp.P-106~ (2007)
  8. 서울특별시, "청계천 복원사업. 환경백서" (2004)
  9. 손명원, "도시하천의 생태학적 역할과 개선방안", 한국지역지리학회지, 4, pp.15~25 (1998)
  10. 손영목, "미호천의 담수어류상에 관한 연구", 한국육수학회지, 16, pp.13~20 (1983)
  11. 손영목, "충청북도 담수어류", 기초과학연구논총, 5, pp.1~38 (1991), 기초과학연구소
  12. 손영목, "미호천의 어류상과 어류군집 동태", 한국어류학회지, 17(4), pp.271~278 (2005), 한국어류학회
  13. 신정이, "자연형 하천 공법 적용후의 식생변화분석 -서울시 양재천의 학여울 구간을 중심으로-", 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 2, pp.10~17 (1999)
  14. 신진철, "전주천, 1950년대로 역류하다 -전주천 자연형 하천 조성사업", 국토, 253, pp.98~103 (2002), 국토연구원
  15. 안광국, "물리적 서식지평가기법 및 어류 다변수 평가모델에 의거한 대전천의 생태학적 건강도 진단", 생태와 환경, 38(3), pp.361~371 (2005), 한국하천호수학회
  16. 안광국, "생태 지표종을 이용한 해부학적 건강성 평가지수(HAI) 적용을 위한 예비실험", 생태와 환경, 39(1), pp.62~72 (2006), 한국하천호수학회
  17. 안광국, "생물보전지수(Index of Biological Integrity)및 서식지 평가지수 (Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index)를 이용한 평창강의 수환경 평가", 생태와 환경, 34(3), pp.153~165 (2001), 한국하천호수학회
  18. 안광국, "유등천에서의 생태학적 건강도 평가 및 수질양상", 생태와 환경, 38(3), pp.341~351 (2005), 한국하천호수학회
  19. 안광국, "생물보전지수(Index of Biological Integrity)및 서식지 평가지수 (Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index)를 이용한 평창강의 수환경 평가", 생태와 환경, 34(3), pp.153~165 (2001), 한국하천호수학회
  20. 안광국, "초강의 통합적 생태건강성 평가", 생태와 환경, 39(3), pp.320~330 (2006), 한국하천호수학회
  21. 우원재, "수변식재에 따른 갑천의 수위분석", 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 1, pp.3~17 (1998)
  22. 이충렬, "갑천수계의 어류상과 어류군집", 환경생물, 19, pp.292~301 (2001)
  23. 전용호, "수생태 복원사업의 현황과 향후전망", 환경연구논문집, 4, pp.23~29 (2007)
  24. 정영훈, "갑천 유역의 빈도별 갈수유량에 따른 필요유량 산정", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 25(2B), pp.97~106 (2005), 대한토목학회
  25. 최미희, "하천복원사업 평가기준의 과제", 환경영향평가, 15(1), pp.13~22 (2006), 한국환경영향평가학회
  26. 최병문, "충북산 담수어에 관한 연구", 충주교육대학 과학교육연구논문, 2, pp.41~59 (1977)
  27. 최재석, "평화의 댐 어류군집 분석", 생태와 환경, 38(3), pp.297~303 (2005), 한국하천호수학회
  28. 자연환경기본계획; 담수어류, "홍영표", 대전직할시, ~ (1994)
  29. 홍영표, "멸죵위기종 미호종개의 현황 및 보존", 한국어류학회 2004년 추계학술발표대회 심포지움 발표요약집, pp.59~75 (2004)
  30. 환경부, "2005예산안 주요사업 설명자료", ~ (2004)
  31. 수생태 건강성 회복을 위한 하천복원 모델과 기준, 조사계획 수립 연구 최종보고서(III): 수생태 건강성 조사계획 수립 및 지침, "환경부", ~ (2007)
  32. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition, "Barbour MT", US Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water, ~, pp.EPA 841-B-99-002 (1999)
  33. Karr JR, "Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities", Fishieries, 6, pp.21~27 (1981)
  34. Assessing biological integrity in running water: A method and its rationale, "Karr JR", Illinois National History Survey, 28~, pp.Special Publication 5 (1986)
  35. Ohio EPA, "Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Vol.II, Users manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters", ~ (1987)
  36. Ohio EPA, "Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Vol. III, Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory method for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities", ~ (1989)
  37. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrate and fish, "Plafkin JL", Office of water regulations and stan-dards. US EPA, ~, pp.EPA (1989), 444[DOI]
  38. Strahler AN, "Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology", American Geophysical Union Transactions, 38, pp.913~920 (1957)
  39. Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters, "US. EPA", Environmental Monitoring systems Laboratory - Cincinnati office of Modeling, Monitoring systems, and quality assurance Office of Research Development, US. EPA, ~ (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)