경관평가 기반 수변구역의 경관관리 전략 - 경안천 수변구역을 대상으로 -
Landscape Management Strategies Based on Landscape Assessment of Riparian Buffer Zone in the Han River: Focused on Gyeongan Stream
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We need to use aesthetic landscape assessment(ALA) as the means of riparian buffer zone(RBZ) management. This study verified the political validity of designation policy of RBZ and land purchase policy. The purpose of this study was to propose RBZ landscape management strategies through ALA of RBZ in Gyeongan Stream for the better attractive and healthy riparian landscapes. The natural type landscape units(LUs) covered 40.9% of the entire area and the cultivated land type LUs covered 20.58%. Landscape assessment consisted of landscape quality and landscape integration assessment. The criteria for assessing landscape quality(LQ) were naturalness, interest, uniqueness, and landscape function. LQ was ranked into five grades using a matrix. The landscape integration assessment consisted of an inner integration assessment in each LU and outer integration assessment among LUs. To review the propriety of designating the riparian area and the riparian ecological belt, differences in ecological appraisal and aesthetic valuation were reviewed through a t-test, Oneway ANOVA, and logistic analysis. The results of ALA, 29.15% of the entire area scored at grade 1 in LQ, while 31.95% scored at grade 5, indicating that grade 5 areas occupied a high share. Surveyed areas were divided into designated RBZ and undesignated RBZ. Results indicated that designated RBZ scored grade 1 in LQ took up 33.2% of the total, significantly higher than the 23.3% taken up by undesignated RBZ. When examined according to buffer distance, grade 1 areas within 50m took up 50.2% of the total area, lower than the 32.7% at buffer distances of 500m-1km. Results indicated a 1% statistically significant difference. Accordingly, analysis was undertaken for the expansion of designation of the riparian area and the selection of appropriate land for formation of a riparian ecological belt, and was designated at priority 1 and 2 for land purchase. This study can also contribute to the formation of a riverine eco-belt through discovery of design factors for upgrading the ecology, aesthetics, and landscape of the riparian area and application in determining land purchase priorities.
Abstract
We need to use aesthetic landscape assessment(ALA) as the means of riparian buffer zone(RBZ) management. This study verified the political validity of designation policy of RBZ and land purchase policy. The purpose of this study was to propose RBZ landscape management strategies through ALA of RBZ in Gyeongan Stream for the better attractive and healthy riparian landscapes. The natural type landscape units(LUs) covered 40.9% of the entire area and the cultivated land type LUs covered 20.58%. Landscape assessment consisted of landscape quality and landscape integration assessment. The criteria for assessing landscape quality(LQ) were naturalness, interest, uniqueness, and landscape function. LQ was ranked into five grades using a matrix. The landscape integration assessment consisted of an inner integration assessment in each LU and outer integration assessment among LUs. To review the propriety of designating the riparian area and the riparian ecological belt, differences in ecological appraisal and aesthetic valuation were reviewed through a t-test, Oneway ANOVA, and logistic analysis. The results of ALA, 29.15% of the entire area scored at grade 1 in LQ, while 31.95% scored at grade 5, indicating that grade 5 areas occupied a high share. Surveyed areas were divided into designated RBZ and undesignated RBZ. Results indicated that designated RBZ scored grade 1 in LQ took up 33.2% of the total, significantly higher than the 23.3% taken up by undesignated RBZ. When examined according to buffer distance, grade 1 areas within 50m took up 50.2% of the total area, lower than the 32.7% at buffer distances of 500m-1km. Results indicated a 1% statistically significant difference. Accordingly, analysis was undertaken for the expansion of designation of the riparian area and the selection of appropriate land for formation of a riparian ecological belt, and was designated at priority 1 and 2 for land purchase. This study can also contribute to the formation of a riverine eco-belt through discovery of design factors for upgrading the ecology, aesthetics, and landscape of the riparian area and application in determining land purchase priorities.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김경탁, "경안천 유역 수변구역 경관구조 변화분석", 한국지리정보학회지, 8(3), pp.74~83 (2005), 한국지리정보학회
- 김성원, "비점오염 부하 저감과 수변구역의 효율적 조성을 위한연구조사", 한국물환경학회 춘계학술발표회 (2006)
- 배민기, "경관단위 기반 수변환경의 심미적 평가 - 한강 수변을 대상으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 40(1), pp.43~56 (2012), 한국조경학회
- 시흥시 자연환경조사 및 도시생태현황도, "시흥시", ~ (2007)
- 서울시 비오톱 유형 특성과 생물다양성 증진방안, "서울시", ~ (2004)
- 안홍규, "하천상류지역의 하반식생 자연도 및경관 분석에 관한 연구", 한국조경학회지, 5(3), pp.234~245 (1997)
- 유상완, "적정 수면폭·하천폭비 산정을 위한 하천경관의 시각적 선호요인 분석 -영산강과 섬진강을 중심으로-", 한국조경학회지, 35(1), pp.28~35 (2007), 한국조경학회
- 제주도 중간산 지역의 경관평가, "제주도청", ~ (2003)
- 이경재, "환경친화적 수변구역관리를 위한 생태적 관리유형 구분 및 관리방안연구", 한국환경생태학회 추계학술대회지 (2008)
- 이명우, "하천복원계획을 위한 생태경관 평가: 전북 만경강 상류지역을 사례로", 한국조경학회지, 34(4), pp.69~83 (2006), 한국조경학회
- 이상석, "하천호안공법의 시각적 선호도- 광양시 동천을 사례로 -", 한국조경학회지, 34(3), pp.12~22 (2006), 한국조경학회
- 경기도 하천경관의 조사와 분석, "이양주", 경기개발연구원, ~ (2002)
- 임승빈, "경관분석론" (1991), 서울대학교 출판부
- 최지용, "물환경 생태복원을 위한 수질관리", 환경생물학회지, 20, pp.20~29 (2002)
- Dunn, M. C, "Landscape with photographs: Testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation", Journal of Environmental Management, 4, pp.15~26 (1976)
- Junker and Buchecker, "Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restoration", Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, pp.141~154 (2008)
- Maekawa and Nakagoshi, "Riparian landscape changes over a period 46 Years, on the Azusa River in Central Japan", Landscape and Urban Planning, 37 (1997)
- USDA Stream Visual Assessment, "NRCS", ~ (1999)
- River Landscape Assessment: Methods and Procedures, "National Rivers Authority", ~ (1995)
- Planning for Landscape Change: Supplementary Planning Guidance to the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996- 2011, "Staffordshire County Council", Landscape Descriptions Stafford Borough, ~ (2001)
- Stamps, A. E, "Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis", Perceptual and Motor Skill, 71, pp.907~913 (1990)
- USDA, "Landscape Aesthetics: A Handbook for Scenery Management", ~ (1995)
- Visual Resource Management(VRM) Program, "USDI-BLM", Division of Recreationand Cultural Resources, ~ (1980)
