본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Do Unions Increase Training to Improve Firm Competitiveness?

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Unions in Korea have had strong impact on improving the life of workers, including wage level, job security, and working conditions. This strong impact, however, also increased labor cost and may have actually hindered companies' competitiveness in the market, particularly in the global market. The question asked in this paper is how do unionized companies with higher labor costs survive in the market? To maintain competitive advantage in the highly competitive global market, highly qualified human resources and continuous upgrading in skills and knowledgethorough active participation in training program, are necessary conditions. The worker's participation, promoted by the union, in training and development may contribute to maintain the competitive advantage of the company. Simple statistics show that unionized companies pay workers more and train them more than nounionized companies do. This may lead to the explanation that unions get more from the company but compensate higher labor cost with more training which may lead to higher productivity. As shown in Korea Investors Service dataset, the absolute levels of per capita sales, ordinary revenue, and net revenue are higher in unionized companies with higher per capita labor cost. However, the effect of unions on training and development cost disappears when some other control variables are included in the model. Furthermore, the union variable was neither statistically significant in the random effect model for company performance on attitudinal measures such as job competency and workers’ motivation nor on financial measures such as per capita value-added, sales, and revenues. Meanwhile, the per capita training cost variable keeps its statistical significance in most of the models analyzed. To survive and prosper under the globalized competition, union may need to bargain not only wages and job security, but also company's competitiveness to help the company survive in the market. One simple but strong way of helping the company to be competitive in the market is upgrading skills and knowledge of union members.

Abstract

Unions in Korea have had strong impact on improving the life of workers, including wage level, job security, and working conditions. This strong impact, however, also increased labor cost and may have actually hindered companies' competitiveness in the market, particularly in the global market. The question asked in this paper is how do unionized companies with higher labor costs survive in the market? To maintain competitive advantage in the highly competitive global market, highly qualified human resources and continuous upgrading in skills and knowledgethorough active participation in training program, are necessary conditions. The worker's participation, promoted by the union, in training and development may contribute to maintain the competitive advantage of the company. Simple statistics show that unionized companies pay workers more and train them more than nounionized companies do. This may lead to the explanation that unions get more from the company but compensate higher labor cost with more training which may lead to higher productivity. As shown in Korea Investors Service dataset, the absolute levels of per capita sales, ordinary revenue, and net revenue are higher in unionized companies with higher per capita labor cost. However, the effect of unions on training and development cost disappears when some other control variables are included in the model. Furthermore, the union variable was neither statistically significant in the random effect model for company performance on attitudinal measures such as job competency and workers’ motivation nor on financial measures such as per capita value-added, sales, and revenues. Meanwhile, the per capita training cost variable keeps its statistical significance in most of the models analyzed. To survive and prosper under the globalized competition, union may need to bargain not only wages and job security, but also company's competitiveness to help the company survive in the market. One simple but strong way of helping the company to be competitive in the market is upgrading skills and knowledge of union members.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Addison, J, "Union voice", Journal of Labor Research, pp.563~596 (2004)
  2. Bae, Moo-Ki, "Union's relative wage effect, Korean Labor Studies, 1.(in Korean)", Korean Labor Studies, 1, ~ (1990)
  3. Baettie, A., "Working People and Lifelong Learning: A Study of the Impact of an Employee Development Scheme" (1997), NIACE
  4. Baltagi, B. H., "Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rded" (2005), Wiley & Sons
  5. Barron, J. M., "Do workers pay for on-the-job training?", Journal of Human Resources, (spring), pp.235~252 (1999)
  6. Bartel, Ann P., "Measuring the employer's return on investments in training: Evidence from the literature", Industrial Relations, 39(3), pp.502~524 (2000)
  7. Human Capital, Cambridge, Mass, "Becker, G.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~ (1964)
  8. Böheim, Renéand, "Trade union presence and employer-provided training in Great Britain", Industrial Relations, 43(3), pp.520~545 (2005)
  9. Booth, Alison L., "Unions, Work-related training, and wages: Evidence for British men", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(1), pp.68~91 (2003)
  10. Castells, M, "The Rise of the Network Society: Volume I of the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture" (1996), Blackwell
  11. Wage Structure in Korea - Changes after 6.29 Declaration, "Cheong, In-Soo", Korea Labor Institute., ~ (1991)
  12. Cho, Woo-Hyun, "Renovation of Industrial Relations" (1992), Changjak and Beepyoung
  13. Factors determining Union joining attitudes and Union's relative wage effect, "Cho, Woo-Hyun", Korea Labor Institute, ~ (1997)
  14. Claydon, Tim, "Can trade unions improve training in Britain", Personnel Review, 23(1), pp.37~51 (1994)
  15. Costine, Pat, "Trade union attitudes towards training and development: The road to a more positive and proactive approach?", Journal of European Industrial Training, 19(10), pp.38~44 (1995)
  16. Tackling the Adult Skills Gap: Upskilling Adults and the Role of Workplace Learning (Third Report of the National Skills Task Force), "Department of Education and Employment", DfEE, ~ (2000)
  17. Doucouliagos, Christos, "What do unions do to productivity? A Meta-analysis", Industrial Relations, 42(4), pp.650~691 (2003)
  18. Hristos Doucouliagos, "Publication bias in union-productivity research?", Relations Industrielles, 2005, pp.60(2), 320~347
  19. Duncan, Greg G., "Do union members receive compensating wage differentials?", American Economic Review, 70, pp.355~371 (1980)
  20. Dundon, Tony, "Employer opposition and union avoidance in the UK", Industrial Relations Journal, 33(3), pp.234~245 (2002)
  21. Labour mobility and individual heterogeneity: a study of the effects of training, unions and employment status on labour turnover, Mimeo, "Elias, P.", Institute for Employment Research, ~ (1991)
  22. Farber, H. S., "Unionism, labor turnover and wages of youngman", Research in Labor Economics, 3, pp.33~53 (1980)
  23. Freeman, Richard B., "The exit-voice tradeoff in the labor market: Unionism, job tenure, quits and separation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, pp.643~673 (1980)
  24. Richard Barry Freeman, "What do Unions do?" (1984), Basic Books
  25. French, Elliott, "Joint Hospital-Union Training and Mount Sinai", Training and Development Journal, 21(1), pp.45~
  26. Fuchs, V., "Economists' view about parameters, values, and policies: Survey results in labor and public economics", Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp.1387~1425 (1998)
  27. Gilbert, Lucie, "Unions and training: A study based on the Adult Education and Training Survey", Education Quarterly Review, 9(1), pp.19~31 (2003)
  28. Green, Francis, "The impact of trade union membership on training in Britain", Applied Economics, 25, pp.1033~1043 (1993)
  29. Green, Francis, "unions and training practices in British workplaces", Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(2), pp.179~195 (1999)
  30. Hashimoto, M., "Firm-specific human capital as a shared investment?", American Economic Review, 71(3), pp.1070~1087 (1981)
  31. Hausman, J. A., "Specification tests in econometrics", Econometrica, 46, pp.320~340 (1978)
  32. Hayes, J, "Bargaining for skills: trade unions and training at the workplace", British Journal of Industrial Relations, 36, pp.450~467 (1998)
  33. Hirsch, B., "What do unions do for economic performance?", Journal of Labor Research, 15, pp.415~455 (2004)
  34. Hsiao, C., "Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed." (2003), Cambridge University Press
  35. Kennedy, H., "Return to Learn: UNISON's Fresh Approach to Trade Union Education" (1995), UNISON
  36. Kim, Dong-Bae, "Factors affecting company education and training, manuscript (in Korean)", ~ (2003)
  37. Kim, Jang-Ho, "The effect of unions on wages: Wage determination mechanism difference by unionization in Korean manufacturing sector", Korean Economic Review, 39(1), pp.21~45 (1991)
  38. Kim, Jang-Ho, "Employment and Industrial Relations in Korea, in Employment and Industrial Relations in Korea", Korea International Labor Foundation, pp.2~20 (2003)
  39. Min, Hwang-Jo, "Union wage effect in Korea: 1987-2001", The Korean Journal of Economics, 11(1), pp.21~45 (2004)
  40. Union Effects: wages, turnover and job training, In New Approaches to Labor Unions, "Mincer, J.", Research in Labor Economics, ~ (1983)
  41. Kennedy, Sean, "The Effect of Trade Unions on the provision of training: Australian Evidence", British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(4), pp.565~580 (1994)
  42. Knoke, David, "Occupational training, unions, and internal labor markets", American Behavioral Scientist, 37(7), pp.992~1016 (1994)
  43. Knoke, David, "Job training in U.S. organizations", American Sociological Review, 59(4), pp.537~546
  44. Kwon, Hyuk-Soo, "The effect of investment on training and development on firm performance variables, Manuscripts, (in Korean)", ~ (2002)
  45. Lee, Young-Myon, "The development of the industrial relations field in Korea", Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 14통권 : 277, pp.279~299 (2005)
  46. Lillard, Lee A, "Private sector training: Who gets it and what are its effects?", Research in Labor Economics, 13, pp.1~62 (1992)
  47. Logan, J., "Is statutory recognition bad news for British unions? Evidence from the history of North American industrial relations", Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 11, pp.63~107 (2001)
  48. Mincer, Jacob, "Union effects: Wages, turnover, and job training", Research in Labor Economics, 2, pp.217~252 (1983)
  49. Oswald, Andrew J., "The economic theory of trade unions: An introductory survey", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87, pp.160~193 (1985)
  50. Payne, John, "Lifelong learning: A national trade union strategy in a global economy", International Journal of Lifelong Education, 20(5), pp.378~392 (2001)
  51. Park, Se-Il, "Unions, Wages and Productivity, In Wage Structure in Korea" (1984), Korea Development Institute
  52. Union's relative wage effect in manufacturing sector in 1990s, "Phang, Ha-Nam", Korean Industrial Relations Research Association, ~ (1997)
  53. Price, R., "Masters, Unions and Men" (1980), Cambridge University Press
  54. Rhee, Chong-Hoon, "Wage: Levels and Structure, in Employment and Industrial Relations in Korea", pp.57~88 (2003), Korea International Labor Foundation
  55. 류재우, "노동조합의 임금과 고용효과", 노동경제논집, 28(1), pp.105~134 (2005), 한국노동경제학회
  56. Ryu, Jang-Soo, "Investment Level and Factors Determining Education and Training in Korean Manufacturing Sector", Korean Economic Review, 45(4), pp.227~249 (1997)
  57. Smith, A, "Analyzing firm training: Five propositions for future search", Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(2), pp.147~167 (2001)
  58. Smith, Liz, "A learning revolution in the workplace?", Adults Learning, 14(10), pp.20~21 (2003)
  59. Stewart, M. J., "Collective bargaining arrangement, closed shops and relative pay", Economic Journal, 97, pp.140~156 (1987)
  60. Sutherland, J, "Unions and workplace learning: Conflict or cooperation with the employer?, in the Workplace: Critical Perspectives on Learning at Work", pp.189~209 (2000), Macmillan
  61. Taubman, Dan, "Unions and learning: the final frontier?", Adult Learning, ~ (2004)
  62. Trades Union Congress (TUC), "Partners for Progress: New Unionism in the Workplace", TUC, ~ (1999)
  63. Turner, H. A., "Trade Union Growth, Structure and Policy" (1962), George Allen & Unwin
  64. Yim, Sang-Hoon, "Korean Industrial Relations Model(I)" (2005), Korea Labor Institute
  65. Yoon, Jin-Ho, "Contingent Workers and Labor Unions" (2001), Korean Congress of Trade Unions
  66. Whitfield, K., "High-performance workplaces, training and the distribution of skills", Industrial Relations, 39(1), pp.1~25 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)