Epistemic constraints on the use of discourse marker of course
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Concerning the use of of course, little research has been conducted to study what function it plays in a discourse nor to find a common thread going through its seemingly various functions such as an inferential marker (Fraser, 1999), a booster or emphasizer (Holmes, 1990), a content disjunct (Quirk et al., 1990), an assessive (Bach, 1999), an evidential marker (Furkó, 2007), etc. Since little have its linguistic contexts been studied, it is hard to tell what linguistic contexts are (in)compatible with it. The current study aims to investigate whether its various discourse functions can be reduced down to a single function, and how this single function is related to the politeness requirement when it occurs in a response to a yes-no question. Furthermore, it also aims to determine its semantics and what it has to do with the lack of its compatibility with questions. To this end, the current study tries to capture the single function of of course within the framework of dynamic semantics (Dekker, 2012; Groenendijk & Stokoff, 1991; Krifka, 2015; Veltman, 1996).
Abstract
Concerning the use of of course, little research has been conducted to study what function it plays in a discourse nor to find a common thread going through its seemingly various functions such as an inferential marker (Fraser, 1999), a booster or emphasizer (Holmes, 1990), a content disjunct (Quirk et al., 1990), an assessive (Bach, 1999), an evidential marker (Furkó, 2007), etc. Since little have its linguistic contexts been studied, it is hard to tell what linguistic contexts are (in)compatible with it. The current study aims to investigate whether its various discourse functions can be reduced down to a single function, and how this single function is related to the politeness requirement when it occurs in a response to a yes-no question. Furthermore, it also aims to determine its semantics and what it has to do with the lack of its compatibility with questions. To this end, the current study tries to capture the single function of of course within the framework of dynamic semantics (Dekker, 2012; Groenendijk & Stokoff, 1991; Krifka, 2015; Veltman, 1996).
참고문헌 (24)
- Bach, K., "The myth of conventional implicature", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(4), pp.327~366 (1999)
- Barron, A., "Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do thing with words in a study abroad context" (2003), John Benjamins
- Brizuela, M., "Discourse markers as indicators of register", Hispani, 82(1), pp.128~141 (1999)[DOI]
- Dekker, P., "Dynamic semantics" (2012), Springer
- Fairbanks, B., "Ojibwe discourse markers", pp.13~44 (2016), University of Nebraska Press
- Fitzgerald, J., "Literacy and students who are learning English as a second language", The Reading Teacher, 46(8), pp.638~647 (1993)
- Fraser, B., "Types of English discourse markers", Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38(1, pp.4) (1988), 19~33
- Fraser, B., "An account of discourse markers", International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), pp.293~320 (2009)[DOI]
- Fraser, B., "What are discourse markers?", Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), pp.931~952 (1999)
- Fuller, J. M., "Discourse marker use across speech contexts : A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance", Multilingua, 22, pp.185~208 (2003)
- Furkó, B. P., "The pragmatic marker-discourse marker dichotomy reconsidere:The case of well and of course" (2007), Debrecen University Press
- Groenendijk, J., "Dynamic predicate logic", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(1), pp.39~100 (1991)
- Heim, I., "The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases" (1988), Garland
- Holmes, J., "Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech", Language and Communication, 10(3), pp.185~205 (1990)
- Huang, Y., "Politeness principle in cross-culture communication", English Language Teaching, 1(1), pp.96~101 (2008)
- Jucker, A. H., "Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory" (1998), John Benjam
- Kamp, H., "From discourse to logic" (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Kasper, G., "Linguistic politeness : Current research issues", Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), pp.193~218 (1990)[DOI]
- Kasper, G., "Pragmatic transfer", Interlanguage Studies Bulletin(Utrecht), 8(3), pp.203~231 (1992)
- Kasper, G., "The handbook of Sociolinguistics", pp.374~385 (2017), John Wiley & Sons
- Veltman, F., "Defaults in update semantics", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 25(3), pp.221~261 (1996)
- Watts, R. J., "Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice" (2008), De Gruyter Mouton
- Yu, M. C., "Cross-Cultural and interlanguage pragmatics: Developing communicative competence in a second language", Doctor, pp.1999
- Zufferey, S., "Acquiring pragmatics: Social and cognitive perspectives" (2014), Routledge