互动交际视角下的“有什么好Ｘ的”研究
An investigation of “有什么好X的” from an interactive communication perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the interactive communication aspects of the common Mandarin Chinese structure “有什么好X的.” Previous research focused on the structure's negative connotation. However, this analysis proposes negation is not just about semantic meaning, but also reflects speaker interaction strategies. Employing an interactive communication perspective, the study analyzes naturally occurring spoken language data to understand negation within “有什么好X的.” The analysis points out that negation response is the pragmatic function of this structure, discovering that this structure has two pragmatic effects: a positive effect and a negative effect. In the discourse characteristics section, this study analyzes usage restrictions, distribution patterns, and response targets in interactive communication. From a communicative perspective, this structure meets the speaker's need to express different stances and helps both the speaker and the listener seek a common ground.
Abstract
This study investigates the interactive communication aspects of the common Mandarin Chinese structure “有什么好X的.” Previous research focused on the structure's negative connotation. However, this analysis proposes negation is not just about semantic meaning, but also reflects speaker interaction strategies. Employing an interactive communication perspective, the study analyzes naturally occurring spoken language data to understand negation within “有什么好X的.” The analysis points out that negation response is the pragmatic function of this structure, discovering that this structure has two pragmatic effects: a positive effect and a negative effect. In the discourse characteristics section, this study analyzes usage restrictions, distribution patterns, and response targets in interactive communication. From a communicative perspective, this structure meets the speaker's need to express different stances and helps both the speaker and the listener seek a common ground.
참고문헌 (29)
- 方梅, "汉语篇章语法研究" (2019), 社会科学文献出版社
- 郭继懋, "反问句的语义语用特点", 中国语文, 2, pp.111~121 (1997)
- 郝玲, "互动视角下现代汉语立场表达研究" (2020), 社会科学出版社
- 何震亚, "谈反问句中的礼貌规约性", 苏州教育学院学报, 1, pp.47~51 (2008)
- 金佳丽, "表示否定义的"有什么好X的"结构及其相关研究", 硕士, pp.2014
- 李宇凤, "反问的回应类型与否定意义", 中国语文, 2, pp.114~123 (2010)
- 李宇明, "反问句的构成及其理解", 殷都学刊, 3, pp.91~99 (1990)
- 刘彬, "疑问和否定的相通性及其条件与机制", 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 3, pp.141~150 (2022)
- 刘娅琼, "汉语谈话中否定反问句的事理立场功能及类型", 中国语文, 2, pp.110~120 (2011)
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2019), 商务印书馆
- 吕叔湘, "吕叔湘文集第3卷" (2004), 商务印书馆
- 缪庆, "互动-语用视角下的否定评价立场研究--以"你看你"为线索", 外语学刊, 2, pp.45~50 (2020)
- 冉永平, "冲突性话语趋异取向的语用分析", 现代外语(季刊), 2, pp.150~155 (2010)
- 邵敬敏, "现代汉语通论" (2007), 上海教育出版社
- 陶红印, "从语体差异到语法差异(上)--以自然会话与影视对白中的把字句, 被动结构, 光杆动词句, 否定反问句为例", 当代修辞学, 1, pp.37~44 (2010)
- 吴继峰, "试析"有什么好X的"", 海外华文教育, 4, pp.21~27 (2012)
- 徐盛恒, "疑问句探询功能的迁移", 中国语文, 1, pp.3~11 (1999)
- 殷树林, "现代汉语反问句研究", 博士, pp.2006
- 乐耀, "从互动交际视角看让步类同语式评价立场的表达", 中国语文, 1, pp.58~69 (2016)
- 张伯江, "否定的强化", 汉语学习, 1, pp.15~18 (1996)
- 朱军, "反问格式"有什么X"的否定模式与否定等级-互动交际模式中的语用否定个案分析", 中国语文, 6, pp.505~517 (2013)
- Enfield, N. J., "The morality of knowledge in conversation", pp.285~312 (2011), Cambridge University Press
- Goodwin, C., "Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive", responsesequences, 2006, pp.26(4), 513~542
- Heritage, J., "The terms of agreement : Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), pp.15~38 (2005)
- Sacks, H., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp.696~735 (1974)
- Pomerantz, A. M., "Structures of social interaction: Studies in conversation analysis", pp.57~101 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Tao, H., "Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar" (1996), John Benjamins
- Thompson, S. A., "Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- White, Peter R., "Beyond modality and hedging : A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance", Text, 23(2), pp.259~284 (2003)