본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 동사의 속성 양범주 분석의 화용적 응용: 연속량과 분리량의 대비를 중심으로

Pragmatic application of the attributional bicategorical analysis of Chinese verbs: Focusing on the contrast between continuous and discrete quantities

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to establish the category boundary of temporality, a property of verbs, based on bicategorical analysis, and to analyze elements that are traditionally grouped by similar meanings in school grammar or have ambiguous grammatical boundaries. First, the time expression expressed in a sentence is divided into external time and internal time, and the boundary is set through the difference between subjectivity and objectivity in the phenomenon where different components show the same aspect. For example, the difference in meaning between the temporal adverbs ‘常常' and ‘经常' was analyzed by applying the distance diagram, and the relationship between the adverbial words ‘就' and ‘快' that make up ‘near future' was examined as the opposition between subjectivity and objectivity. In addition, the opposition between discrete and continuous quantities, which forms the basis of bicategorical analysis, is expected to apply not only to adverbs of time and quantifiers but also to adverbs of frequency and degree.

Abstract

This study aims to establish the category boundary of temporality, a property of verbs, based on bicategorical analysis, and to analyze elements that are traditionally grouped by similar meanings in school grammar or have ambiguous grammatical boundaries. First, the time expression expressed in a sentence is divided into external time and internal time, and the boundary is set through the difference between subjectivity and objectivity in the phenomenon where different components show the same aspect. For example, the difference in meaning between the temporal adverbs ‘常常' and ‘经常' was analyzed by applying the distance diagram, and the relationship between the adverbial words ‘就' and ‘快' that make up ‘near future' was examined as the opposition between subjectivity and objectivity. In addition, the opposition between discrete and continuous quantities, which forms the basis of bicategorical analysis, is expected to apply not only to adverbs of time and quantifiers but also to adverbs of frequency and degree.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김동환, "주관화와 의미확장", 현대문법연구, 23, pp.127~148 (2001)
  2. 박성하, "현대중국어 유의어 의미구분을 위한 도식화 교수법 연구", 중국어문학, 74, pp.275~301 (2017)
  3. 이기동, "언어 주관성의 문제", 한글, 206, pp.177~208 (1989)
  4. 이선희, "현대중국어의 주관량(主观量)대소전도현상과 어순변화", 중국언어연구, 17, pp.225~250 (2003)
  5. 주기하, "‘就’의 주관량(主观量)표기(标记)기능 연구", 중국어문학지, 48, pp.397~421 (2014)
  6. 陈小荷, "主观量问题初探 : 兼谈副词"就", "才", "都"", 世界汉语教学, 30(4), pp.18~24 (1994)
  7. 戴耀晶, "汉语否定句的语义确定性", 世界汉语教学, 67(1), pp.20~27 (2004)
  8. 董秀芳, "主观性表达在汉语中的凸显性及其表现特征", 语言科学, 85(6), pp.561~570 (2016)
  9. 郭先珍, "现代汉语量词用法词典" (2002), 语文出版社
  10. 李善熙, "汉语“主观量”的表达研究", 博士, pp.2003
  11. 李明, "量词及量范畴再思考", 社科纵横, 28, pp.9~ (2013)
  12. 李宇明, "主观量的成因", 汉语学习, 101(5), pp.3~7 (1997)
  13. 李宇明, "数量词语与主观量", 华中师范大学学报, 38(6), pp.90~97 (1999)
  14. 李宇明, "汉语量范畴研究" (2000), 华中师范大学出版社
  15. 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
  16. 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
  17. 沈家煊, "语言的"主观性"和"主观化"", 外语教学与研究, 33(4), pp.268~275 (2001)
  18. 施关淦, "语法研究和探索(四)" (1988), 商务印书馆
  19. 宋文辉, "词序与"量"否定的结果", 河北师范大学学报, 28(6), pp.73~80 (2005)
  20. 吴秀菊, "量词"点"的产生及其发展演变", 殷都学刊, 36(3), pp.86~89 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)