이중주어 구문의 높임 호응에 대한 의미론적 재조명: 수용도 판정 실험을 통한 실증 연구
A Semantic Approach to Honorific Agreement in Double-subject Constructions: An Experimental Study of Native Speaker Acceptability Judgments
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study addresses honorific agreement in double-subject constructions in Korean from a semantic perspective. The question of which NP triggers honorific agreement with the verb has been highly controversial among scholars. We propose that honorific agreement in double-subject constructions is constrained by semantic distance between NP1 and NP2 in terms of possession and subsidiariness. Using semantic features, we classified NP1-NP2 relations into four types that varied in their degree of possession and subsidiariness, and predicted that honorific agreement with NP1 would be natural in the order of ‘person-attribution’, ‘person-part’, ‘person-possession’, and ‘person-person’ types. To verify our prediction, we conducted an acceptability judgment experiment. Fifty-six adult native speakers of Korean participated in an acceptability judgment task, and were asked to rate the acceptability of different types of double-subject sentences. The verb of each sentence was presented either in the honorific form or in the base form. The analysis of the acceptability judgment data confirmed our predicted order of acceptability. Further, agreement with NP2 was judged as more acceptable when it was a possession or a person. The findings suggest that the acceptability of honorific agreement is affected by semantic constraints, and is gradual across different semantic relation types.
Abstract
This study addresses honorific agreement in double-subject constructions in Korean from a semantic perspective. The question of which NP triggers honorific agreement with the verb has been highly controversial among scholars. We propose that honorific agreement in double-subject constructions is constrained by semantic distance between NP1 and NP2 in terms of possession and subsidiariness. Using semantic features, we classified NP1-NP2 relations into four types that varied in their degree of possession and subsidiariness, and predicted that honorific agreement with NP1 would be natural in the order of ‘person-attribution’, ‘person-part’, ‘person-possession’, and ‘person-person’ types. To verify our prediction, we conducted an acceptability judgment experiment. Fifty-six adult native speakers of Korean participated in an acceptability judgment task, and were asked to rate the acceptability of different types of double-subject sentences. The verb of each sentence was presented either in the honorific form or in the base form. The analysis of the acceptability judgment data confirmed our predicted order of acceptability. Further, agreement with NP2 was judged as more acceptable when it was a possession or a person. The findings suggest that the acceptability of honorific agreement is affected by semantic constraints, and is gradual across different semantic relation types.
참고문헌 (27)
- 안명철, "이중주어 구문과 구동사", 국어학, 38, pp.181~207 (2001)
- 안명철, "주어존대법과 구동사 구문", 우리말글, 29, pp.129~154 (2003), 우리말글학회
- Chaffin, Roger, "Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization", pp.253~288 (1992), Erlbaum
- Chaffin Roger, "A taxonomy of part–whole relations", Cognition and Language, 3, pp.1~32 (1988)
- 장석진, "화의 생성적 연구", 어학연구, 9(2), pp.1~160 (1973)
- Collins, Allan. M., "Retrieval time from semantic memory", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, pp.240~248 (1969)
- 한길, "‘이른 바 겹임자말’ 월에서의 주체높임법에 관한 연구", 강원인문논총, 8, pp.51~79 (2000)
- 김건희, "서술절에 대한 재고찰 - 내포절 체계 내의 다른 절과의 변별을 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (43), pp.29~63 (2017), 한말연구학회[DOI]
- 이홍식, "국어 문장의 주성분 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.1996
- 이정복, "상황 주체 높임 ‘-시-’의 확산과 배경", 언어과학연구, (55), pp.217~246 (2010), 언어과학회
- 임동훈, "이중 주어문의 통사", 한국문화, (19), pp.31~66 (1997), 규장각한국학연구원
- 임동훈, "현대국어 경어법의 체계", 國語學, (47), pp.287~320 (2006), 국어학회
- 임홍빈, "주격 중출론을 찾아서", 문법연구, 1, pp.1~22 (1974)
- 목정수, "국어 이중주어 구문의 새로운 해석", 언어학, (41), pp.75~99 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 목정수, "선어말어미 ‘-시-’의 기능과 주어 존대", 國語學, (67), pp.63~106 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 목정수, "이중 주어 구문 새로 보기 -기본문형 설정과 관련하여", 국어국문학, (196), pp.5~48 (2021), 국어국문학회
- Murphy, Lynn M, "Semantic Relations and the Lexicon : Antonymy, Synonymy, and other Paradigms" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Pitha, Petr, "Remarks on possessivity", Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 16, pp.33~46 (1971)
- Priss, Uta E, "WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database", pp.179~196 (1998), MIT Press
- 서정수, "주체 대우법의 문제점", 배달말, 2, pp.5~22 (1977)
- 성기철, "현대 국어 주체 대우 연구", 한글, 184, pp.81~112 (1984)
- 성기철, "현대국어 대우법 연구" (1985), 개문사
- 송창선, "보어의 범위 확대에 대한 비판적 고찰", 국어교육연구, (74), pp.55~78 (2020), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- Storey, Veda C, "Understanding semantic relationships", VLDB Journal, 2, pp.455~488 (1993)
- 서정연, "언어의 형식화 제안 – 한국어 이중주어 구문을 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, (92), pp.543~574 (2012), 한국불어불문학회
- Winston, Morton E., "A taxonomy of part–whole relations", Cognitive Science, 11, pp.417~444 (1987)
- Zoeppritz, Magdalena, "The meaning of OF and HAVE in the USL system", American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(2), pp.109~119 (1981)