실패지식을 활용한 리더십 실패 특성 도출에 관한 연구
A Study of the Trait of Leadership Failure Using Failure Knowledge
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is tried to draw the failure traits of leadership by extracting leadership parts from previous failure studies and including some parts which mention failure leadership among leadership-related books. All of 5 patterns are drawn through total 13 types of study data. From ‘insensitive to change’ and authoritarianism which is mentioned 8 times in such 13 studies, to ‘interpersonal problem’, which is mentioned five times, traits which are mentioned at least five times are selected. There are drawn 5 traits including △ authoritarianism △ insensitive to change △lack of executive ability △populism and △interpersonal problem. As being examined in these 5 types of failure traits, the failure of leadership is ultimately happened because of communication heading for the inside without any communication(exchange) to the outside. That is, it is understood that authoritarian leaders don’t perceive change correctly but make a wrong communication (populism) or break down communication. Additionally, the executive ability is to perform actually one’s idea and to be achieved through incessant communication with members. Compared with other various studies to draw failure factors, these leadership traits have something in common. In the previous researches conducted the study of general failure factors, △adherence to pre-existing business and resistance to change △unfeasible expansion strategy △blind faith in successful technology and innovation and △insufficiency to grasp competitor(consumer) are pointed out as the failure factors. It is deemed that these are happened because organizational management is headed for the inside without any communication (exchange) to the external environments. Matters unfolded through this paper until now are an attempt to apply the failure knowledge to a leadership part which is an individual field in business administration. It is considered that this study will be complemented through additional case study or quantitative analysis in the future.
Abstract
It is tried to draw the failure traits of leadership by extracting leadership parts from previous failure studies and including some parts which mention failure leadership among leadership-related books. All of 5 patterns are drawn through total 13 types of study data. From ‘insensitive to change’ and authoritarianism which is mentioned 8 times in such 13 studies, to ‘interpersonal problem’, which is mentioned five times, traits which are mentioned at least five times are selected. There are drawn 5 traits including △ authoritarianism △ insensitive to change △lack of executive ability △populism and △interpersonal problem. As being examined in these 5 types of failure traits, the failure of leadership is ultimately happened because of communication heading for the inside without any communication(exchange) to the outside. That is, it is understood that authoritarian leaders don’t perceive change correctly but make a wrong communication (populism) or break down communication. Additionally, the executive ability is to perform actually one’s idea and to be achieved through incessant communication with members. Compared with other various studies to draw failure factors, these leadership traits have something in common. In the previous researches conducted the study of general failure factors, △adherence to pre-existing business and resistance to change △unfeasible expansion strategy △blind faith in successful technology and innovation and △insufficiency to grasp competitor(consumer) are pointed out as the failure factors. It is deemed that these are happened because organizational management is headed for the inside without any communication (exchange) to the external environments. Matters unfolded through this paper until now are an attempt to apply the failure knowledge to a leadership part which is an individual field in business administration. It is considered that this study will be complemented through additional case study or quantitative analysis in the future.
참고문헌 (29)
- 강민형, "지식이전행위, 어떻게 측정해야 하나? - 제공자와 수용자의 관점 비교", 지식경영연구, 12(2), pp.1~16 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
- 리더십 실패의 함정과 성공의 지혜, "노용진", LG경제연구원, ~ (2005)
- 인재 킬러형 리더, "노용진", LG경제연구원, ~ (2005)
- 데니스 홀리, "반복의 심리학" (2010), 흐름출판
- 박보식, "리더십 이론과 실제" (2012), 대영문화사
- 시드니 핑켈스타인, "실패에서 배우는 성공의 법칙" (2009), 황금가지
- 심형석, "실패지식의 개념화를 위한 탐색적 연구", 지식경영연구, 12(4), pp.121~132 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
- 심형석, "어떻게 실패는 성공을 부르는가" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 이건창, "성공적인 지식경영시스템 운영전략을 통한 조직혁신과 성과향상에 관한 사례연구", 지식경영연구, 11(5), pp.25~36 (2010), 한국지식경영학회
- 이건창, "위기극복을 위한 효과적 지식관리 전략에 관한 사례연구", 지식경영연구, 11(4), pp.79~89 (2010), 한국지식경영학회
- 이경상, "100대 기업의 변천과 시사점" (2011), 대한상공회의소
- 이광석, "정책집행의 성공과 실패에 있어서 정책결정자의 역할에 관한 고찰", 서울행정학회·한국조직학회·한국정책과학학회 2005년 추계학술대회 발표논문집, pp.27~51 (2005)
- 이창준, "리더십 패스파인더" (2009), 학이시습
- 실패하는 리더 이렇게 행동한다, "정영철", LG경제연구원, ~ (2004)
- 조지 페드라자, "신임리더 100일안에 장악하라" (2008), 위즈덤하우스
- 진영재, "성공한 대통령 실패한 대통령 : 인물론, 조직론 그리고 국민선택론", 한국정치학회보, 35(2), pp.481~497 (2001)
- 패트릭 M. 렌시오니, "CEO가 빠지기 쉬운 5가지 오류" (2007), 위즈덤하우스
- 테리 R. 베이컨, "굿리더십" (2007), 비전코리아
- 하타무라 요타로, "나와 조직을 살리는 실패학의 법칙" (2008), 들녘
- 헤르몬 지몬, "히든 챔피언" (2008), 흐름출판
- 헨리페트로스키, "종이 한 장의 차이" (2008), 웅진지식하우스
- 리더십 이너샤, 조직변화를 가로막는 벽을 깨려면, "황인경", LG경제연구원, ~ (2012)
- Corporate Leadership Council, "Driving Performance and Retention through Employee Engagement" (2004), Corporate Executive Board
- Douglas A. Ready, "Why Leadership Development Efforts Fail", Sloan Management Review, (봄), pp.83~88 (2003)
- Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory : An analysis of decisions under risk", Econometrica, 47, pp.313~327 (1979)
- Margarethe Wiersema, "Holes at the Top : Why CEO Firings Backfire", Harvard Business Review, 80(12), pp.70~77 (2002)
- Rudies, E., "CEO challenge:Perspectives and analysis 2007 edition" (2007), DDI
- Willian E. Schneider, "Why Good Management Ideas Fail : the Neglected Power of Organizational Culutre", Strategy &Leadership, 28(1), pp.24~29 (2000)
