본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

실패학을 활용한 신규사업 실패요인의 유형화에 관한 연구

A Study on the Type of the New Business Failure Factors Using Failure Knowledge

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

It is tried to draw the failure traits of new business by extracting from previousfailure studies. All of 5 patterns are drawn through total 9 types of study data. From ‘synergy obsession’ which is mentioned 6 times in such 9 studies, to ‘technicalproblem’, which is mentioned 4 times, the types which are mentioned at least 4 timesare selected. There are drawn 5 types including △synergy obseesion △adherence tothe existing business practices △lack of entrepreneurship △overvaluation ofself-ability and △technical problem. As being examined in these 5 types of failure traits, the failure of new business isultimately happened because of communication heading for the inside without anycommunication(exchange) to the outside. Compared with other various studies to draw failure factors, these new businesstraits have something in common. In the previous researches conducted by the studyof general failure factors, △adherence to pre-existing business and resistance tochange △unfeasible expansion strategy △blind faith in successful technology andinnovation and △insufficiency to grasp competitor(consumer) are pointed out as thefailure factors. It is deemed that these are happened because business managementis headed for the inside without any communication (exchange) to the externalenvironments. Matters unfolded through this paper until now are an attempt to apply the failureknowledge to a new business part which is an individual field in businessadministration. It is considered that this study will be complemented throughadditional case study or quantitative analysis in the future.

Abstract

It is tried to draw the failure traits of new business by extracting from previousfailure studies. All of 5 patterns are drawn through total 9 types of study data. From ‘synergy obsession’ which is mentioned 6 times in such 9 studies, to ‘technicalproblem’, which is mentioned 4 times, the types which are mentioned at least 4 timesare selected. There are drawn 5 types including △synergy obseesion △adherence tothe existing business practices △lack of entrepreneurship △overvaluation ofself-ability and △technical problem. As being examined in these 5 types of failure traits, the failure of new business isultimately happened because of communication heading for the inside without anycommunication(exchange) to the outside. Compared with other various studies to draw failure factors, these new businesstraits have something in common. In the previous researches conducted by the studyof general failure factors, △adherence to pre-existing business and resistance tochange △unfeasible expansion strategy △blind faith in successful technology andinnovation and △insufficiency to grasp competitor(consumer) are pointed out as thefailure factors. It is deemed that these are happened because business managementis headed for the inside without any communication (exchange) to the externalenvironments. Matters unfolded through this paper until now are an attempt to apply the failureknowledge to a new business part which is an individual field in businessadministration. It is considered that this study will be complemented throughadditional case study or quantitative analysis in the future.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 금융감독원, "상장폐지 기업의 특징 및 시사점" (2010), 금융감독원
  2. 경영실패의 주범:AIDS, "김근영", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2009)
  3. 위기에 빠진 기업에 대한 오해, "김범열", LG경제연구원, ~ (2010)
  4. 김선규, "2차전지 한국 어디까지 왔나", 이코노믹리뷰, ~ (2013)
  5. 마이클 레이너, "위대한 전략의 함정" (2007), 청림출판
  6. 문성식, "Kano 모델을 이용한 패스트푸드 전문점의 서비스 품질요소 분류 및 만족도 연구 -전남지역 대학생을 대상으로-", 한국창업학회지, 9(2), pp.75~92 (2014), 한국창업학회
  7. 신사업 성공을 막는 7가지 바이러스, "박용삼", 포스코경영연구소, ~ (2014)
  8. 손강호, "기업혁신과 혁신제도의 공진화 혁신", 한국창업학회지, 9(4), pp.221~241 (2014), 한국창업학회
  9. 시드니 핑켈스타인, "실패에서 배우는 성공의 법칙" (2009), 황금가지
  10. 간과하기 쉬운 신규사업 추진 시의 함정과 극복, "신현곤", 포스코경영연구소, ~ (2007)
  11. 심형석, "실패지식의 개념화를 위한 탐색적 연구", 지식경영연구, 12(4), pp.121~132 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
  12. 심형석, "어떻게 실패는 성공을 부르는가" (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
  13. 신사업 성공을 가로막는 내부의 덫, "유호현", LG경제연구원, ~ (2005)
  14. 실증분석에 근거한 신제품 실패원인, "이완수", 마케팅연구원, ~ (1996)
  15. 이종덕, "중소기업의 핵심역량과 경쟁전략이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 한국창업학회지, 9(3), pp.154~183 (2014), 한국창업학회
  16. 신제품개발, 실패에서 배우기, "장성근", LG경제연구원, ~ (2010)
  17. 잭디시 세스, "배드해빗" (2008), 럭스미디어
  18. 엔론 파산의 파장과 교훈, "전영재", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2002)
  19. 정진호, "벤처기업의 성장단계과정에서 성공실패 요인과 극복방안에 관한 연구", 석사, 테크노경영학, pp.2008
  20. 짐 콜린스, "위대한 기업은 다 어디로 갔을까" (2010), 김영사
  21. 춘카무이, "위험한 전략" (2009), 흐름출판
  22. 할렌 플랫, "기업이 실패하는 5가지 이유" (2001), 시그마인사이트컴
  23. 변신에 실패하는 기업들이 빠지는 오류, "4형민우", LG경제연구원, ~ (2006)
  24. Christensem, Clayton M., "The innovator's dilemma : when new technologies cause great firms to fail" (1997), Harvard Business School Press
  25. David A. Garvin, "What Every CEO should know about creating new business", Harvard Business Review (2004)
  26. 3Dennis Wholey, "Why do I keep doing that?" (2010), Health Communication Inc
  27. Fleiss, J. L., "Statistical methods for rates and proportions(2nd ed.)" (1981), John Wiley
  28. Hamel, G., "Competing for the Future" (2013), Harvard Business Press
  29. Henry Petroski, "Success through Failure : The Paradox of Design" (2006), Princeton University Press
  30. Kahneman, D., "Prospect theory : An analysis of decisions under risk", Econometrica, 47(2), pp.263~291 (1979)
  31. Peter F. Drucker., "A Conversation With Peter Drucker &Peter M. Senge : Leading in a time of change, what it will take to lead tomorrow" (2001), WILEY
  32. Sull, D. N., "Why good companies go bad and how great managers remake them" (2005), Harvard Business Press
  33. Stevens, G. A., "3, 000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success!", Research-Technology Management, 40(3), pp.16~27 (1997)
  34. Zenas Block., "Corporate Venturing : creating new businesses within the firm" (1993), Harvard Business School Press
  35. 3畑村洋太郞, "失敗學の法則" (2005), 文芸春秋

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)