본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

S/W개발자의 IT 프로젝트 참여 의도 연구: 조절초점에 따른 프로젝트 기술 최신성의 효과를 중심으로

S/W Developer’s IT Project Participation: Focusing on the Moderating Role of Regulatory Focus on the Effect of Technology Recency on Participation Intention

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

In the success of an IT project, the role of S/W developer in carrying out the project is critical and crucial. However, compared to its importance, there is only a few studies on the role of human resources in software engineering field, mainly focusing on technology. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study examines how the effect of technology recency on developer’s intention to participate in the IT project changes depending on the regulatory focus of the software developer. As a result of the experiment, it was confirmed that there is a difference in the effect of technology recency on project participation intention according to the condition of developer’s regulatory focus. This study is meaningful because it extends regulatory focus theory to software engineering field and made theoretical contribution to the research field of behavioral software engineering. In practical, it was possible to suggest a way to improve the intention of the developer to participate in the project, by understanding the software developer in the IT project, considering the software developer propensity and project characteristics.

Abstract

In the success of an IT project, the role of S/W developer in carrying out the project is critical and crucial. However, compared to its importance, there is only a few studies on the role of human resources in software engineering field, mainly focusing on technology. Based on regulatory focus theory, this study examines how the effect of technology recency on developer’s intention to participate in the IT project changes depending on the regulatory focus of the software developer. As a result of the experiment, it was confirmed that there is a difference in the effect of technology recency on project participation intention according to the condition of developer’s regulatory focus. This study is meaningful because it extends regulatory focus theory to software engineering field and made theoretical contribution to the research field of behavioral software engineering. In practical, it was possible to suggest a way to improve the intention of the developer to participate in the project, by understanding the software developer in the IT project, considering the software developer propensity and project characteristics.

참고문헌 (72)

  1. Aaker, J. L., "“I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulator y goals in information processing and persuasion", Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), pp.33~49 (2001)
  2. Ajzen, I., "The theory of planned behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), pp.179~211 (1991)
  3. Bardsley, N., "Experimental economics and the artificiality of alteration", Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2), pp.239~251 (2005)
  4. Beecham, S., "Motivation in Software Engineering: A systematic literature review", Information and Software Technology, 50(9), pp.860~878 (2008)
  5. Boehm, B. W., "Software engineering economics" (1981), Prentice-hall
  6. Boehm, B. W., "Understanding and controlling software costs", Journal of Parametrics, 8(1), pp.32~68 (1988)
  7. Bradley, J. H., "The effect of personality type on team performance", Journal of Management Development, 16(5), pp.337~353 (1997)
  8. Brendl, C. M., "Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?", Advances in experimental social psychology, 28, pp.95~160 (1996)
  9. Butler, T., "The Relationship between User Participation and the Management of Change Surrounding the Development of Information Systems: A European Perspective’", Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), pp.12~25 (2001)
  10. Calder, B. J., "Designing research for application", Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), pp.197~207 (1981)
  11. Camacho, C. J., "Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), pp.498~ (2003)
  12. Capretz, L. F., "Personality t ypes i n software engineering", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(2), pp.207~214 (2003)
  13. Cohen, S. G., "The effectiveness of self-managing teams: A quasi-experiment", Human relations, 47(1), pp.13~43 (1994)
  14. Constantine, L. L., "Constantine on peopleware" (1995), Prentice Hall
  15. Couger, J. D., "Motivating and managing computer personnel" (1980), Wiley
  16. Crowe, E., "Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations:Promotion and prevention in decisionmaking", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), pp.117~132 (1997)
  17. Cruz, S., "Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: A mapping study", Computers in Human Behavior, 46, pp.94~113 (2015)
  18. Curtis, B., "A field study of the software design process for large systems", Communications of the ACM, 31(11), pp.1268~1287 (1988)
  19. Da Silva, F. Q. B., "Towards understanding the underlying structure of motivational factors for software engineers to guide the definition of motivational programs", Journal of Systems and Software, 85(2), pp.216~226 (2012)
  20. Davis, F. D., "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319~340 (1989)
  21. Falk, A., "Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences", Science, 326(5952), pp.535~538 (2009)
  22. Faraj, S., "Coordinating expertise in software development teams", Management Science, 46(12), pp.1554~1568 (2000)
  23. Feldt, R., "Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers", Information and Software Technology, 52(6), pp.611~624 (2010)
  24. Fitzgerald, B., "An empirica llygrounded framework for the information systems development process", Proceedings of the international conference on Information systems, pp.103~114 (1998), Association for Information Systems
  25. Categories and Contexts of Information Systems Development: Making Sense of the Mess, "Fitzgerald, B.", ECIS, 194~211 (1999)
  26. Guinan, P. J., "The effective use of automated application development tools", IBM Systems Journal, 36(1), pp.124~139 (1997)
  27. Hall, T., "A systematic review of theory use in studies investigating the motivations of software engineers", ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 18(3), pp.10~ (2009)
  28. Hannay, J. E., "A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments", IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2), pp.87~107 (2007)
  29. Haws, K. L., "An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures", Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), pp.967~982 (2010)
  30. Higgins, E. T., "Beyond pleasure and pain", American Psychologist, 52(12), pp.1280~ (1997)
  31. Higgins, E. T., "Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as amotivational principle", Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, pp.1~46 (1998)
  32. Higgins, E. T., "Making a good decision: value from fit", American Psychologist, 55(11), pp.1217~ (2000)
  33. Higgins, E. T., "Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), pp.515~ (1997)
  34. Hohmann, L., "Journey of the software professional: a sociology of software development" (1996), Prentice-Hall
  35. Janz, B. D., "Knowledge worker team effectiveness:The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables", Personnel Psychology, 50(4), pp.877~904 (1997)
  36. Jones, M. C., "IS project team performance : an empirical assessment", Information &Management, 31(2), pp.57~65 (1996)
  37. Judd, C. M., "Research methods in social relations" (1991)
  38. Kautz, K., "The enactment of methodology: the case of developing a multimedia information system", ICIS 2004Proceedings, pp.55~ (2004)
  39. Kim, J.-H., "A scenariobased experiment and a f ield study: A comparative examination for service failure and recovery", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 41, pp.125~132 (2014)
  40. Kirton, M. J., "Adapters and Innovators:Styles of Creativity and Problem Solving" (1994), Routledge
  41. Kitchenham, B. A., "Evidence-based software engineering", Proceedings of the 26th international conference on software engineering, pp.273~281 (2004), IEEE Computer Society
  42. Koufaris, M., "Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior", Information Systems Research, 13(2), pp.205~223 (2002)
  43. Lee, A. Y., "The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), pp.1122~ (2000)
  44. Lenberg, P., "Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review", Journal of Systems and Software, 107, pp.15~37 (2015)
  45. Levitt, S. D., "Viewpoint:On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field", Canadian Journal of Economics, 2007, pp.40(2), 347~370
  46. Liberman, N., "Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1135~ (1999)
  47. Linberg, K. R., "Software developer perceptions about software project failure:a case study", Journal of Systems and Software, 49(2), pp.177~192 (1999)
  48. Lyytinen, K., "Information systems failures: a survey and classification of the empirical literature", Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, 4(1), pp.257~309 (1987)
  49. McConnell, S., "Problem programmers", IEEE Software, 15(2), pp.126~128 (1998)
  50. McLeod, L., "Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research", ACM Computing Surveys, 43(4), pp.24~ (2011)
  51. Myers, I. B., "MBTI manual:A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" (1998), Consulting Psychologists Press
  52. Nandhakumar, J., "The fiction of methodological development:a field study of information systems development", Information Technology &People, 12(2), pp.176~191 (1999)
  53. Orne, M. T., "On the social psychology of the psychological experiment :With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications", American Psychologist, 17(11), pp.776~ (1962)
  54. Oz, E., "Why information systems projects are abandoned:a leadership and communication theory and exploratory study", Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(1), pp.66~78 (2000)
  55. Poulymenakou, A., "A contingency framework for the investigation of information systems failure", European Journal of Information Systems, 5(1), pp.34~46 (1996)
  56. Procaccino, J. D., "Case study:factors for early prediction of software development success", Information and Software Technology, 44(1), pp.53~62 (2002)
  57. Procaccino, J. D., "What do software practitioners really think about project success: an exploratory study", Journal of Systems and Software, 78(2), pp.194~203 (2005)
  58. Rasch, R. H., "Factors affecting software developers’ performance:an integrated approach", MIS Quarterly, 16(3), pp.395~413 (1992)
  59. Roese, N. J., "Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and suff iciency versus necessity", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1109~ (1999)
  60. Sassenberg, K., "The attraction of social power:The inf luence of constr uing power as opportunity versus responsibility", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), pp.550~555 (2012)
  61. Schwalbe, K., "Information technology project management" (2015), Cengage Learning
  62. Scott, J. E., "Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations", Communications of the ACM, 45(4), pp.74~81 (2002)
  63. Shah, J., "Expectancy× value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), pp.447~ (1997)
  64. Shah, J., "Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency :the general impact of promotion and prevention", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), pp.693~ (2001)
  65. Sharp, H., "Models of motivation in software engineering", Information and Software Technology, 51(1), pp.219~233 (2009)
  66. Smith, D. C., "The personality of the systems analyst: an investigation", ACM SIGCPR Computer Personnel, 12(2), pp.12~14 (1989)
  67. Spector, P. E., "Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work", Human Relations, 39(11), pp.1005~1016 (1986)
  68. Taylor, S., "Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience", MIS Quarterly, 19(4), pp.561~570 (1995)
  69. Turley, R. T., "Competencies of exceptional and nonexceptional software engineers", Journal of Systems and Software, 28(1), pp.19~38 (1995)
  70. Venkatesh, V., "Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model", Information Systems Research, 11(4), pp.342~365 (2000)
  71. Venkatesh, V., "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, 46(2), pp.186~204 (2000)
  72. Venkatesh, V., "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view", MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp.425~478 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)