본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제 테러리즘에 관한 연구 - 핵테러의 발생가능성과 방지대책을 중심으로 -

A Study on the possible outbreak of international nuclear terrorism

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The ultimate purpose of the thesis is to verify the possibility and the fear of nuclear terrorism. The reason we cannot exactly estimate the consequences of a nuclear threat is because we it has never occurred before. However, it is a horrifying event that no one can even imagine. An enormous aftermath of a nuclear terror to include mass casualties, mass destruction, political, economic, sociocultural, psychological will be followed. There will be not only sociopolitical chaos but also astronomical costs to pay for. Even a nuclear devise that is not sophisticated may not achieve the goal of a terror, the sociopolitical chaos and impact will be beyond imagination. It is inevitable for a terror to occur given the strong resolution of the terrorists, terrorists’ accessibility to nuclear weapons or basic material to produce nuclear weapons. The main strategy to prevent nuclear terror is to deny access of the terrorists on nuclear weapons or nuclear materials. To achieve this goal we should establish international security and order in accordance to the Three No’s Doctrine and Seven Yeses. The 3 No’s Doctrines are as follows. 1)first condition is to prevent release and losses of nuclear weapons and materials. 2)Prevent terrorist states from possessing facilities to produce nuclear level plutonium after uranium enrichment and fuel reprocessing. 3)allowing the current 8 countries that have nuclear weapons (US, UK, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and Israel) to possess more nuclear weapons. The Sevens Yeses are as follows. 1) Absolute national priority to prevent nuclear terrorism, 2) concentrated war on terror, 3) mplement a humble foreign policy, 4)a global network coalition to prevent terrorism, 5) intelligence capability required to the success of nuclear terrorism, 6) handling of dirty bombs (expansion of radioactive material), 7) Establish layers of defense posture So far we are successful in achieving nuclear deterrence. However, if terrorist have nuclear weapons in their hands one blast will destroy a city or even a nation causing tremendous damage and casualties easily. We will not be able to maintain deterrence forever and the activity of international terrorists are too much unstable. In the end as more nations have access to the use of nuclear and chemical biological weapons, the more threat we will face by terrorists. The US government is highly concerned on the possible nuclear weapon terror activity by extremist. High attention is paid to WMD and nuclear weapon terror after 9/11. We are living in a time where terrorist activities are hard to predict when and how. Especially with the expansion of WMD, this can reinforce the military capabilities of the terrorist. Asymmetric threat to include terrorism cannot be solved by military means only. The international society should get together. In this regard, the future national security strategy should include military, political, diplomatic, economic, intelligence. We need to shift to a comprehensive strategic approach in dealing with this treat. Terror can exercise influence to the international community in the future. Terrorism will expand in scope and capability. A more powerful and violent terrorist will threaten the lives and systems of the international society. The weapons they use will include conventional, informational, nuclear, bio chemical. In the future terrorism in the international community will be independent or be supported by a nation. It will turn into a more violent action and more precise in propaganda and political use.

Abstract

The ultimate purpose of the thesis is to verify the possibility and the fear of nuclear terrorism. The reason we cannot exactly estimate the consequences of a nuclear threat is because we it has never occurred before. However, it is a horrifying event that no one can even imagine. An enormous aftermath of a nuclear terror to include mass casualties, mass destruction, political, economic, sociocultural, psychological will be followed. There will be not only sociopolitical chaos but also astronomical costs to pay for. Even a nuclear devise that is not sophisticated may not achieve the goal of a terror, the sociopolitical chaos and impact will be beyond imagination. It is inevitable for a terror to occur given the strong resolution of the terrorists, terrorists’ accessibility to nuclear weapons or basic material to produce nuclear weapons. The main strategy to prevent nuclear terror is to deny access of the terrorists on nuclear weapons or nuclear materials. To achieve this goal we should establish international security and order in accordance to the Three No’s Doctrine and Seven Yeses. The 3 No’s Doctrines are as follows. 1)first condition is to prevent release and losses of nuclear weapons and materials. 2)Prevent terrorist states from possessing facilities to produce nuclear level plutonium after uranium enrichment and fuel reprocessing. 3)allowing the current 8 countries that have nuclear weapons (US, UK, France, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and Israel) to possess more nuclear weapons. The Sevens Yeses are as follows. 1) Absolute national priority to prevent nuclear terrorism, 2) concentrated war on terror, 3) mplement a humble foreign policy, 4)a global network coalition to prevent terrorism, 5) intelligence capability required to the success of nuclear terrorism, 6) handling of dirty bombs (expansion of radioactive material), 7) Establish layers of defense posture So far we are successful in achieving nuclear deterrence. However, if terrorist have nuclear weapons in their hands one blast will destroy a city or even a nation causing tremendous damage and casualties easily. We will not be able to maintain deterrence forever and the activity of international terrorists are too much unstable. In the end as more nations have access to the use of nuclear and chemical biological weapons, the more threat we will face by terrorists. The US government is highly concerned on the possible nuclear weapon terror activity by extremist. High attention is paid to WMD and nuclear weapon terror after 9/11. We are living in a time where terrorist activities are hard to predict when and how. Especially with the expansion of WMD, this can reinforce the military capabilities of the terrorist. Asymmetric threat to include terrorism cannot be solved by military means only. The international society should get together. In this regard, the future national security strategy should include military, political, diplomatic, economic, intelligence. We need to shift to a comprehensive strategic approach in dealing with this treat. Terror can exercise influence to the international community in the future. Terrorism will expand in scope and capability. A more powerful and violent terrorist will threaten the lives and systems of the international society. The weapons they use will include conventional, informational, nuclear, bio chemical. In the future terrorism in the international community will be independent or be supported by a nation. It will turn into a more violent action and more precise in propaganda and political use.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 구춘권, "메가테러리즘과 미국의 세계절서전쟁" (2005), 책세상
  2. 김동신, "미국의 대전략" (2005), 나남출판사
  3. 김태우, "핵테러리즘" (2007), 한국해양전략연구소
  4. 김한택, "테러리즘과 국제법" (2007), 지인북스
  5. 김혁, "탈냉전 이후 국제테러리즘의 새로운 동향", 2002 춘계학술회의 논문 (2002), 한국국제정치학회
  6. 신성호, "부시와 오바마 : 핵테러에 대한 두가지 접근", 2008 년례학술회의 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
  7. 이웅혁, "테러의 범죄학적 예방전략 : 탐색적 접근을 중심으로", 제2회 대테러 세미나 (2007), 경찰청
  8. 이창용, "뉴테러리즘과 국가위기 관리" (2007), 대영문화사
  9. 이태윤, "21세기 국제테러리즘" (2004), 모시는 사람들
  10. 정우영, "화학 및 생물무기 테러 대응책 In: 화생무기의 국제적 위협실태 및 대처방안" (2002), 육군사관학교
  11. 채재병, "국제테러리즘과 군사적 대응", 국제정치논총, 44(2), pp.55~74 (2004), 한국국제정치학회
  12. Bowman H. Mitter, "The Evolution of Revolutionary Warfare In: Trent, Terrorism: Threat, Reality, Response" (1979), Hoover Institution Pr.
  13. Brian Jenkins, "International Terrorism and World Security In: The Use of Force, 5th ed." (1999), Rowman and Littlefield
  14. Gavin Cameron, "Nuclear Terrorism : Weapons for Sale or Theft? Foreign Policy Agenda Vol. 10 In: Protecting the American Homeland: A Preliminary Analysis" (2005), Brookings Institution Press
  15. Wardlaw, "Grant Political Terrorism: Theory, Tactics and Counter- Measure" (1982), University Pr.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)