미국의 대량살상무기 대확산(Counter-proliferation)정책 발전과 함의
A Study on the US WMD Counter-proliferation Policy
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
WMD Counter-proliferation led by US DOD constitutes a part of national grand strategy as well as a core of new national security policy. Apart from international law and practices, so-called rogue states and non-state actors coaxes others to develop, produce and transfer WMD such as nuclear and chem-bio weapons, and ballistic missile since it causes huge damage to a superior enemy to themselves in cheap price. WMD proliferation has been constrained by the international nonproliferation regimes based on diplomatic negotiation in the past, but today, reportedly even UN Security Council faces their ongoing brinkmanship tactics with no substantive progress in solution for North Korean and Iranian nuclear cases. Now it is suspected that at least 25 countries possess or in the process of acquiring and developing capabilities to inflict mass casualties and destruction, and also predicted that those number will continue to be increased over years. The US Counter-proliferation Policy was initiated under the perception that nonproliferation policy of diplomatic means failed, and more practical, aggressive action involving military response is required since worldwide proliferation of WMD directly challenges US national interests. In December 1993 Leslie Aspin, the Clinton Administration's Secretary of Defense launched the Defense Counter-proliferation Initiative, followed by establishing the Counter-proliferation Council the mission of which is to supervise overall mission as for counter-proliferation-related works. The counter-proliferation objectives and direction of the Bush Administration are well explicated in a number of presidential speeches and three major policy declarations such as the National Security Strategy of the United States of America, National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, and National Security Strategy for Combating Terrorism. Under the circumstances that global peace and stability are threatened by rogue states, terrorism, and the universalization of WMD, the US is to deter proliferation, restore the world order, and protect its vital national interests and security of the allies through a number of vehicles embracing PSI, MD, Global Partnership, and international cooperation.
Abstract
WMD Counter-proliferation led by US DOD constitutes a part of national grand strategy as well as a core of new national security policy. Apart from international law and practices, so-called rogue states and non-state actors coaxes others to develop, produce and transfer WMD such as nuclear and chem-bio weapons, and ballistic missile since it causes huge damage to a superior enemy to themselves in cheap price. WMD proliferation has been constrained by the international nonproliferation regimes based on diplomatic negotiation in the past, but today, reportedly even UN Security Council faces their ongoing brinkmanship tactics with no substantive progress in solution for North Korean and Iranian nuclear cases. Now it is suspected that at least 25 countries possess or in the process of acquiring and developing capabilities to inflict mass casualties and destruction, and also predicted that those number will continue to be increased over years. The US Counter-proliferation Policy was initiated under the perception that nonproliferation policy of diplomatic means failed, and more practical, aggressive action involving military response is required since worldwide proliferation of WMD directly challenges US national interests. In December 1993 Leslie Aspin, the Clinton Administration's Secretary of Defense launched the Defense Counter-proliferation Initiative, followed by establishing the Counter-proliferation Council the mission of which is to supervise overall mission as for counter-proliferation-related works. The counter-proliferation objectives and direction of the Bush Administration are well explicated in a number of presidential speeches and three major policy declarations such as the National Security Strategy of the United States of America, National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, and National Security Strategy for Combating Terrorism. Under the circumstances that global peace and stability are threatened by rogue states, terrorism, and the universalization of WMD, the US is to deter proliferation, restore the world order, and protect its vital national interests and security of the allies through a number of vehicles embracing PSI, MD, Global Partnership, and international cooperation.
참고문헌 (58)
- 국방부 군비통제관실, "대량살상무기(WMD) 문답백과", pp.92~ (2001)
- "UN Security Council Resolution 687(1991), 3 April 1991", ~ (1991)
- "Press Trust of India-Ackerman to head panel on Kahn network hearing"[URL]
- "Proliferation: Threat and Response", pp.53~ (1997), The U.S. Office of the secretary of Defense
- Barry R. Schneider, "Future War and Counterproliferation: U.S. Military to NBC Threats", pp.45~ (1999), Praeger
- "roliferation: Threat and Response, p. 61", ~
- Barry Schneider, "Military Responses to Proliferation Threats, in Schneider and Dowdy, p. 306", ~
- "Proliferation: Threat and Response, p. 61", ~
- "Statement by John A. Lauder, Special Assisstant to the Director of Central Intelligence for Nonproliferation, at Commission Hearing, 29 April 1999, p. 6", ~ (1999)
- "Combating Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Report of the Commission to Assess the Organization of the Federal Government to Combat the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 1999, p. 1", ~ (1999)
- "The National Security Strategy fo the United States of America", pp.12~ (2006), The White House
- "BWC Forth Review Conference Final Document, 6 December 1996"
- 김구섭, , 원광 군사논단, (4), pp.423~ (2008), 원광대학교
- "소형 핵탄두 밀거래 가능성"[URL]
- Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran, "IAEA Director General", ~ (2005)
- 조성권, "미국-이란의 핵갈등과 미국의 에너지 안보", 국가전략, 14(1), pp.161~166 (2008), 세종연구소
- 이헌경, "부시 행정부의 군사안보전략", pp.36~37 (2003), 연구총서
- "Proliferation: Threat and Response, p. 53", ~
- Report on Nonproliferation and Counterproliferation Activities and Programs(the Deutch Report), , Office of the Deputy Secretary of Defense, ~ (1994)
- "1997 CPRC Report to Congress, Chapter 5, p. 2", ~ (1997)
- "Proliferation: Threat and Response, p. 6", ~
- NATO Counterproliferation Policy: A Case Study in Alliance Politics, "Jeffrey A. Larsen", 15~16, pp.INSS Occasional Paper 17 (1997)
- M. Nacht, "U.S. Counterproliferation Policy" (2005)
- Jeffrey Record, "Policy Analysis: Nuclear Deterrence, Preventive War, and Counterproliferation, 8 July 2004, p. 2", 2~ (2004)
- "National Journal's, We will Prevail": President George W. Bush on War, Terrorism, and Freedom(New York: Continuum Press, 2003", ~ (2003)
- "The White House, National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 2002, p. 1", ~
- "We will prevail, p. 161", ~
- "The Price of Inaction Can Be Truly Catastrophic"[URL]
- "The White House, National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 2002, p. 36", 36~ (2002)
- Why War?, U.S. News and World Report, "Kevin Whitelaw", ~ (2002)
- Derrick Z. Jacson, "Still No Mass weapons, No Ties to 9", 11, No Truth, Boston Globe, 17 December 17, 2003, 2003
- "The White House, National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, December 2002, pp. 2-3", ~ (2002)
- "The White House, National Security Strategy of the United States of America, March 2006, pp. 18-19", ~ (2006)
- "Nuclear Posture Review"[URL]
- "The U.S. Department of Defense, National Defense Strategy, March 2005", ~ (2005)
- "The U.S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report, 6 Feburary 2006, pp. 19-40", ~ (2006)
- "4년주기 국방검토보고서(QDR)와 국가안보전략서(NSS)의 비교"[URL]
- "CJCS Counterproliferation Charter, 3 September 1996", ~ (1996)
- The White House, "National Strategy to combat Weapons of Mass destruction" (2002)
- "Exchange of notes between the United Kingdom and the United states?, 18 AJIL Supplement(1924), p. 127", ~ (1924)
- "Recent Developments in the Law of the Sea and china?", pp.251~258 (2006), Nijhoff
- 이서항, "PSI의 최근 동향과 전망 in: 주요국제문제분석" (2008), 주요국제문제분석
- 한용섭, "냉전에서 경제전으로", pp.8~9 (1998), 오름
- 조홍제, "미사일방어와 한국의 선택", pp.259~260 (2007), 한누리 미디어
- "Proliferation: Threat and Response, The U.S. Office of the secretary of Defense, November 2001, pp. 99-103", ~ (2001)
- 박휘락, "한국 미사일 방어에 관한 주요 쟁점 분석", 국가전략, 14(1), pp.63~94 (2008), 세종연구소
- "Ground-Based Midcourse defense"[URL]
- "Pentagon success simulated missile defense system in California to intercept a target launched from Alaska"[URL]
- "협력적 위협감축조치(Cooperative threat Reduction) 방식을 통한 북한 핵문제 해결방안에 관한 고찰"[URL]
- "Challenges of Counter-Proliferation for the New NATO"[URL]
- "NATO Assigns Counterproliferation Tasks to Military Forces, BASIC-BITS Press Release, April 24, 1999", ~ (1999)
- "The Impact of U.S. Counterproliferation Policy on NATO and EU, PSR(Physicians for Social Responsibility), Spring 2003", ~ (2003)
- "Biological Terrorism: The Anthrax Scare of 2001"[URL]
- 국방부 군비통제관실, "군비통제 국제조약집" (1993)
- Possible Elements for a Future International Legal Agreement on the Prevention of the Development of Weapons in Outer Space, the Threat or Use of Force Against Outer Space Objects, "Hu Xiaodi", ~, pp.CD (2002), 1679 Working Paper
- 美 오바마 행정부의 외교안보정책 전망, "김성한", 한국전략문제연구소(KRIS), 4~, pp.한국전략문제연구소(KRIS) 정책토론회 결과보고서 08-11(No. 145) (2008)