본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

比喩와 類推 및 心理를 활용한 子貢의 설득 커뮤니케이션 전략 검토 - 『論語』와 『史記』 「仲尼弟子列傳」을 중심으로

Analysis of Zigong’s Persuasive Communication Strategyusing Metaphor, Simile, Inference, and Psychology- Particularly on 『Lunyu(論語)』 and 『Shiji(史記)』 「Zhongni Dizi Liechuan (仲尼弟子列傳)」 -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Based on this study, Zigong’s persuasive communication strategies which use metaphor, simile, and inference are summarized into in the following manner. Confucius’s tendency of realpolitik implied in 『Lunyu』 influenced Zigong’s political- diplomatic skills, corresponding with 「Zhongni Dizi Liechuan」. Persuasive skills that Zigong showed can be pointed out as follows. First, conversations between Zigong and Confucius in 『Lunyu』 were mostly about political participation. In those incisive questions, persuasion to generalize and inference of future gave people trust and connected to high-level persuasive skills. Not only allusions in 『Shih Ching』 make readers understand the meaning of story by enhancing literary expressions and readers’ imagination, but also tendency of traditionalism becomes the norm of ethical and political assessment in the present. Second, Zigong became the main agent of persuasion and mentioned metaphor and simile as a communication skill in the conversations without Zigong and Confucius. A metaphor means the method which alludes the object to another object in common. Zigong emphasized the difference with Confucius by alluding Confucius to ‘the highest wall,’ ‘sun and moon,’ and ‘the heavens’. Also, there is an aspect of Confucianism with simultaneously respecting his teacher and showing his great realpolitik-ability. Third, diplomatic skills in 『Shiji』 「Zhongni Dizi Liechuan」 became the most effective persuasion by applying both logic and emotion. It looked into avoidable or charming factors, then stimulated the opponent with ‘antimony theory’ and ‘irony’. Additionally, emotions such as ‘favor,’ ‘fear,’ and ‘anger’ were applied at the right point, accompanying ‘inference’. It was possible to persuade someone with fine logic and ability to identify one’s mind as well as morality, Ren(仁). In other words, each circumstance that countries have, king’s competence to adapt, and logical fluency were essential conditions. Fourth, the biggest persuasive factor is in ‘improving(切磋琢磨).’ and ‘guess and hit(億則屢中)’. Someone who was eloquent but not prudent, was refined by Confucius’s education and Zigong’s effort. The ability of ‘guess and hit(億則屢中)’ emerged when having conversation with people and achieved saving Lu with diplomacy. As this study noted, Zigong’s persuasive communication strategy used rhetorical competence and psychology. Besides, it has advantage at speaking in today’s perspective.

Abstract

Based on this study, Zigong’s persuasive communication strategies which use metaphor, simile, and inference are summarized into in the following manner. Confucius’s tendency of realpolitik implied in 『Lunyu』 influenced Zigong’s political- diplomatic skills, corresponding with 「Zhongni Dizi Liechuan」. Persuasive skills that Zigong showed can be pointed out as follows. First, conversations between Zigong and Confucius in 『Lunyu』 were mostly about political participation. In those incisive questions, persuasion to generalize and inference of future gave people trust and connected to high-level persuasive skills. Not only allusions in 『Shih Ching』 make readers understand the meaning of story by enhancing literary expressions and readers’ imagination, but also tendency of traditionalism becomes the norm of ethical and political assessment in the present. Second, Zigong became the main agent of persuasion and mentioned metaphor and simile as a communication skill in the conversations without Zigong and Confucius. A metaphor means the method which alludes the object to another object in common. Zigong emphasized the difference with Confucius by alluding Confucius to ‘the highest wall,’ ‘sun and moon,’ and ‘the heavens’. Also, there is an aspect of Confucianism with simultaneously respecting his teacher and showing his great realpolitik-ability. Third, diplomatic skills in 『Shiji』 「Zhongni Dizi Liechuan」 became the most effective persuasion by applying both logic and emotion. It looked into avoidable or charming factors, then stimulated the opponent with ‘antimony theory’ and ‘irony’. Additionally, emotions such as ‘favor,’ ‘fear,’ and ‘anger’ were applied at the right point, accompanying ‘inference’. It was possible to persuade someone with fine logic and ability to identify one’s mind as well as morality, Ren(仁). In other words, each circumstance that countries have, king’s competence to adapt, and logical fluency were essential conditions. Fourth, the biggest persuasive factor is in ‘improving(切磋琢磨).’ and ‘guess and hit(億則屢中)’. Someone who was eloquent but not prudent, was refined by Confucius’s education and Zigong’s effort. The ability of ‘guess and hit(億則屢中)’ emerged when having conversation with people and achieved saving Lu with diplomacy. As this study noted, Zigong’s persuasive communication strategy used rhetorical competence and psychology. Besides, it has advantage at speaking in today’s perspective.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 공자, "論語" (2020), 휴머니스트
  2. 권영민, "한국현대문학대사전" (2004), 서울대학교출판부
  3. 류종목, "논어의 문법적 이해" (2018), 문학과 지성사
  4. 김원중, "중국문학이론의 세계" (2000), 을유문화사
  5. 사마천, "史記" (2018), 민음사
  6. 성백효, "논어집주 부 안설" (2013), 한국인문고전연구소
  7. 아리스토텔레스, "아리스토텔레스 수사학" (2020), 현대지성
  8. 정약용, "論語古今註" (2016), 사암
  9. 좌구명, "춘추좌전" (2006), 한길사
  10. 천위안, "자공의 설득학" (2015), 아이넷북스
  11. 范文瀾, "文心雕龍注" (1980), 明倫出版社
  12. 黃慶萱, "修辭學" (1983), 三民書局印行
  13. 김영기, "공자 사후 공문 후계구도와 ≪논어≫의 편찬-학이편을 중심으로-", 중국어문학, (58), pp.23~63 (2011), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
  14. 김영하, "子貢", 역사교육논집, (7), pp.79~94 (1985), 역사교육학회
  15. 김원중, "『史記』 「貨殖列傳」을 통해 본 ‘富’와 權力의 關聯樣相", 동양학, (66), pp.1~20 (2017), 동양학연구원[DOI]
  16. 박혁재, "공자(孔子) 『논어(論語)』의 설득 수사학", 수사학, (35), pp.69~89 (2019), 한국수사학회[DOI]
  17. 심경호, "한문고전과 한문학에서의 수사학에 대하여", 수사학, (3), pp.137~175 (2005), 한국수사학회
  18. 안성재, "孔子 道의 내용과 형식 분석- 《論語(논어)》 <顔淵(안연)편>의 棘子成(극자성)과 子貢(자공) 대화를 중심으로", 수사학, (24), pp.163~179 (2015), 한국수사학회
  19. 이범열, "현대중국어 반어에 대한 화행적 고찰", 중국어문학지, (35), pp.231~259 (2011), 중국어문학회
  20. 이상익, "<韓非子>의 矛盾論과 <韓非子>의 矛盾", 동양문화연구, 29, pp.75~111 (2018), 동양문화연구원[DOI]
  21. 李昇薰, "중국수사학의 비유이론", 중국문학, 40, pp.223~240 (2003), 한국중국어문학회
  22. 이연훈, "『韓非子』『說林』편 寓言의 유형 분석으로 본 글쓰기 전략 - 형식과 내용에 따른 분류를 중심으로", 동북아 문화연구, 1(62), pp.89~109 (2020), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
  23. 장영백, "공자 제자들의 인물성격 연구", 중국어문학논집, (117), pp.359~392 (2019), 중국어문학연구회
  24. 주재우, "유추(類推)를 통한 설득 표현 교육 연구", 국어교육, (122), pp.177~199 (2007), 한국어교육학회
  25. 하재홍, "수사학이 유용한 이유들에 대한 검토 - 아리스토텔레스『수사학』, 1355a20-1355b7을 중심으로 -", 수사학, (34), pp.207~234 (2019), 한국수사학회[DOI]
  26. 杨淑明, "孔门弟子仲由端木赐探论", 理论学刊, pp.87~89 (1997)
  27. 杨永芳, "『论语』中的“子贡”形象", 学术探讨, pp.80~82 (2019)
  28. 杨果, "子贡言语研究", 硕士, pp.2020
  29. 林东杰, "再论“性与天道不可得而闻也”—以孔子, 子贡师生关系为中心", 贵州文史丛刊, pp.74~78 (2020)
  30. 苗泽华, "儒商鼻祖子贡的经商之道与人生智慧", 江苏商论, pp.25~27 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)