『韓非子』『說林』편 寓言의 유형 분석으로 본 글쓰기 전략 - 형식과 내용에 따른 분류를 중심으로
Writing Strategy by Analyzing Yuyan Types in Chapter 「ShouLin」 of 『Han Feizi』 - Focusing on Classification of Form and Content
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Han Feizi said “Generally speaking, difficulty of persuading is on whether I can fit in to someone’s need by considering one’s mind” in 「ShuoLin」. Yuyan in 「ShouLin」 examined in this paper is an effective writing strategy delivering the meaning without showing itself directly. By trying classification on feature, an assemble of stories, in 『Han Feizi』 「ShuoLin」’s 71 Yuyans, we can confirm highly developed strategy increasing its persuasion-effect. As schematizing Yuyan category and analyzing it which is related to writing strategy, we are able to find several features. First, Yuyan can be categorized by ‘who is the main character’ and ‘whether it is dependent or not’; chapter 「ShouLin」 is largely human-Yuyan and independent-Yuyan. Human-Yuyan enhances persuasion effect by creating and transforming it with usage of historical stories. Animal-Yuyan and Human-Animal-Yuyan, rarely used, are effective way to indirectly persuade the emperor by animal metaphor also decreasing a risk with direct advice. Using allegorical elements when extending range of meaning by controlling rhetorical techniques suitably and decreasing the techniques, when concentrating by direct proposal, it shows a great reconstitution. This is an aspect that represents active writing for a final goal to convincing the emperor. Second, Yuyan can be categorized into explanation type, story type, and criticism type. Han Feizi showed writer’s point indirectly and directly by explaining animal’s body structure and making storytelling. He demonstrated himself a distinguished literary philosopher using Yuyan – an effective and interesting way – which represents his political philosophy ‘Law․ Tactics․Power.’ While reading 『Han Feizi』 we can ease our prejudice about him being an inflexible jurist, which helps us realize the ground of comfortable reading is Yuyan that uses a variety of rhetoric techniques and writing strategy. Third, categorizing Yuyan in a form-content collaborative way, it can be classified into ‘analogy’ and ‘suggesting a topic.’ 「ShuoLin」 uses various analogies with mentioning small episodes and generalizing them into large ideas, which are easy to persuade the emperor. Furthermore, it enhances persuasive power by mentioning the topic in direct and indirect ways. Last, it used various methods flexibly - proverb, history, and character – as a basis of fulfillment without dividing periods. We can find Han Feizi’s realistic and active way of thinking. This paper studied how metaphorical elements are expressed by classifying Yuyan in 「 ShuoLin」 according to categories. The classification as above can help us to perceive commonness and individuality of each piece. It also enables us to examine, study, and appreciate the rules of Yuyan advancement. This classification is meaningful in that it can be a basis work for more profound research in the future.
Abstract
Han Feizi said “Generally speaking, difficulty of persuading is on whether I can fit in to someone’s need by considering one’s mind” in 「ShuoLin」. Yuyan in 「ShouLin」 examined in this paper is an effective writing strategy delivering the meaning without showing itself directly. By trying classification on feature, an assemble of stories, in 『Han Feizi』 「ShuoLin」’s 71 Yuyans, we can confirm highly developed strategy increasing its persuasion-effect. As schematizing Yuyan category and analyzing it which is related to writing strategy, we are able to find several features. First, Yuyan can be categorized by ‘who is the main character’ and ‘whether it is dependent or not’; chapter 「ShouLin」 is largely human-Yuyan and independent-Yuyan. Human-Yuyan enhances persuasion effect by creating and transforming it with usage of historical stories. Animal-Yuyan and Human-Animal-Yuyan, rarely used, are effective way to indirectly persuade the emperor by animal metaphor also decreasing a risk with direct advice. Using allegorical elements when extending range of meaning by controlling rhetorical techniques suitably and decreasing the techniques, when concentrating by direct proposal, it shows a great reconstitution. This is an aspect that represents active writing for a final goal to convincing the emperor. Second, Yuyan can be categorized into explanation type, story type, and criticism type. Han Feizi showed writer’s point indirectly and directly by explaining animal’s body structure and making storytelling. He demonstrated himself a distinguished literary philosopher using Yuyan – an effective and interesting way – which represents his political philosophy ‘Law․ Tactics․Power.’ While reading 『Han Feizi』 we can ease our prejudice about him being an inflexible jurist, which helps us realize the ground of comfortable reading is Yuyan that uses a variety of rhetoric techniques and writing strategy. Third, categorizing Yuyan in a form-content collaborative way, it can be classified into ‘analogy’ and ‘suggesting a topic.’ 「ShuoLin」 uses various analogies with mentioning small episodes and generalizing them into large ideas, which are easy to persuade the emperor. Furthermore, it enhances persuasive power by mentioning the topic in direct and indirect ways. Last, it used various methods flexibly - proverb, history, and character – as a basis of fulfillment without dividing periods. We can find Han Feizi’s realistic and active way of thinking. This paper studied how metaphorical elements are expressed by classifying Yuyan in 「 ShuoLin」 according to categories. The classification as above can help us to perceive commonness and individuality of each piece. It also enables us to examine, study, and appreciate the rules of Yuyan advancement. This classification is meaningful in that it can be a basis work for more profound research in the future.
참고문헌 (35)
- 王先愼, "韓非子集解" (2007), 中華書局
- 劉履, "文淵閣四庫全書 第一三七○册", 臺灣商務印書館
- 吳禮權, "修辭心理學" (2013), 暨南大學出版社
- 馬世年, "『韓非子』的成書及其文學硏究" (2011), 上海古籍出版社
- 小野澤精一, "全釋 漢文大系 韓非 上" (1982), 集英社
- 張覺 撰, "韓非子校疏析論" (2013), 知識産權出版社
- 김원중, "중국문학이론의 세계" (2000), 을유문화사
- 김원중, "(명역고전)명심보감" (2017), 휴머니스트 출판사
- 陳蒲淸, "중국우언문학사" (1994), 소나무
- 윤주필, "세계의 우언과 알레고리" (2010), 지식산업사
- 이병한, "中國古典文學理論批評史" (1988), 한국방송통신대학
- 梁啟超, "要籍解題及其讀法" (2010), 岳麓书社
- 莊子, "莊子" (1993), 현암사
- 莊子, "莊子" (2010), 연암서가
- 전인초, "중국고대소설사" (1992), 신아사
- 張覺, "『韓非子』使用歷史故事和窩言的獨特風格淺說", 西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (2), pp.75~77 (1990)
- 王舸, "『韩非子』寓言的批判性研究", 碩士, pp.2015
- 于亞飛, "莊子與韓非子寓言藝術特色批敎", 貴州師範學院學報, 31(8), pp.24~28 (2015)
- 孫豔秋, "『莊子』和『韓非子』寓言的不同特色", 河南社會科學, 16(3), pp.108~110 (2008)
- 宋興昌, "『韓非子』寓言的取材及成因", 柳州職業技術學院學報, pp.69~71 (2009)
- 馬世年, "『韓非子』的成書及其文學研究", 博士, pp.2005
- 張婕, "『韓非子』寓言芻論", 碩士, pp.2011
- 宋宏, "『韓非子』寓言研究", 碩士, pp.2009
- 徐卉, "試論『韓非子』寓言中的動植物世界", 語文知識, (4), pp.91~ (2012)
- "Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics" (1974), Princeton Univ. Press
- 權錫煥, "先秦寓言 硏究", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.1993
- 권체환, "〈莊〉 · 〈韓〉 寓言의 장르적 계승관계", 중국학논총, (2), pp.1~30 (1993), 한국중국문화학회[DOI]
- 金元中, "《文心雕龍》 修辭論 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.1995
- 김원중, "《韓非子》를 통해서 본 韓非子의 글쓰기 전략에 관한 몇 가지 검토", 중국학논총, (49), pp.99~122 (2016), 한국중국문화학회
- 문승용, "韓非子에 나타난 修辭意識의 形成 淵源 考", 수사학, (16), pp.97~119 (2012), 한국수사학회
- 이승훈, "고대중국수사학의 ‘설득’에 대한 연구-《韓非子》의〈難言〉과〈說難〉편을 중심으로", 중국문학, 64, pp.25~49 (2010), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 정학성, "우언양식의 서사구조와 비판정신", 동양학, (38), pp.29~44 (2005), 동양학연구원
- 황준연, "한비자의 세계와 인간에 대한 인식", 유학연구, 27, pp.305~329 (2012), 유학연구소[DOI]
- 한영걸, "『韓非子』 寓言의 일부 修辭法에 대한 小考", 동양학, (70), pp.23~37 (2018), 동양학연구원[DOI]
- 한영걸, "『韓非子』의 寓言과 法, 勢, 術思想의 연관성 研究", 박사, pp.2019
