Efficacy of Red or Infrared Light-Emitting Diodes in a Mouse Model of Propionibacterium acnes-Induced Inflammation
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Laser/light-based devices may provide an alternative to conventional acne therapeutics in some patients with nonresponsive acne. Objective: We investigated the efficacy of red or infrared light-emitting diode (LED) devices in a mouse model of Propionibacterium acnes-induced inflammation through clinical examination and histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. Methods: A human- derived Propionibacterium acnes suspension (109 colony- forming units /μl) was injected into the back of an HR-1 mouse. Then, a 28.9 J/cm2 650-nm red LED or 9.3 J/cm2 830-nm infrared LED was applied to the mouse with P. acnes-induced inflammation once daily for 2 weeks. Two weeks after treatment, histological findings with hematoxylin and eosin staining and expression levels of inflammatory biomarkers (integrin α6, neutrophils, interleukin [IL]-1β, and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-2/9) were evaluated in tissue specimens using immunohistochemical staining. Results: Mice treated with red and infrared LED showed clinical improvement in inflammatory nodules compared to mice in the control group. Red LED was much more effective than infrared LED. Epidermal hyperplasia, comedone-like cysts, and integrin α6 expression improved to a similar extent in the red and infrared LED treatment groups and control group. Neutrophil, IL-1β, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression after treatment with red and infrared LED decreased considerably compared to expression in the control group. Conclusion: In a mouse model of P. acnes-induced inflammatory nodules, red and infrared LED devices may be an alternative to conventional acne therapies. In addition, a mouse model of P. acnes-induced inflammatory nodules is helpful for laboratory research of acne.
Abstract
Background: Laser/light-based devices may provide an alternative to conventional acne therapeutics in some patients with nonresponsive acne. Objective: We investigated the efficacy of red or infrared light-emitting diode (LED) devices in a mouse model of Propionibacterium acnes-induced inflammation through clinical examination and histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. Methods: A human- derived Propionibacterium acnes suspension (109 colony- forming units /μl) was injected into the back of an HR-1 mouse. Then, a 28.9 J/cm2 650-nm red LED or 9.3 J/cm2 830-nm infrared LED was applied to the mouse with P. acnes-induced inflammation once daily for 2 weeks. Two weeks after treatment, histological findings with hematoxylin and eosin staining and expression levels of inflammatory biomarkers (integrin α6, neutrophils, interleukin [IL]-1β, and matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-2/9) were evaluated in tissue specimens using immunohistochemical staining. Results: Mice treated with red and infrared LED showed clinical improvement in inflammatory nodules compared to mice in the control group. Red LED was much more effective than infrared LED. Epidermal hyperplasia, comedone-like cysts, and integrin α6 expression improved to a similar extent in the red and infrared LED treatment groups and control group. Neutrophil, IL-1β, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expression after treatment with red and infrared LED decreased considerably compared to expression in the control group. Conclusion: In a mouse model of P. acnes-induced inflammatory nodules, red and infrared LED devices may be an alternative to conventional acne therapies. In addition, a mouse model of P. acnes-induced inflammatory nodules is helpful for laboratory research of acne.
참고문헌 (13)
- Shaheen B., "Acne sans P. acnes", J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 27, pp.1~10 (2013)
- Sun Young Huh, "The Effect of Photodynamic Therapy Using Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Green Light on Acne Vulgaris", Annals of Dermatology, 24(1), pp.56~60 (2012), 대한피부과학회
- Jeremy AH., "Inflammatory events are involved in acne lesion initiation", J Invest Dermatol, 121, pp.20~27 (2003)
- Mirshahpanah P., "Models in acnegenesis", Cutan Ocul Toxicol, 26, pp.195~202 (2007)
- Mariwalla K., "Use of lasers and light-based therapies for treatment of acne vulgaris", Lasers Surg Med, 37, pp.333~342 (2005)
- Nakano K., "Real-timereflectance confocal microscopy, a noninvasive tool for in vivo quantitative evaluation of comedolysis in the rhino mouse model", Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 20, pp.29~36 (2007)
- Nakatsuji T., "Bioengineering a humanized acne microenvironment model : proteomics analysis of host responses to Propionibacterium acnes infection in vivo", Proteomics, 8, pp.3406~3415 (2008)
- Charakida A., "Phototherapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris : what is its role?", Am J Clin Dermatol, 5, pp.211~216 (2004)
- Elman M., "Light therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris", Dermatol Surg, 30, pp.139~146 (2004)
- Ross EV, "Optical treatments for acne", Dermatol Ther, 18, pp.253~266 (2005)
- Young S., "Macrophage responsiveness to light therapy", Lasers Surg Med, 9, pp.497~505 (1989)
- Kjeldstad B, "Different photoinactivation mechanisms in Propionibacterium acnes for near-ultraviolet and visible light", Photochem Photobiol, 46, pp.363~366 (1987)
- Goldberg DJ., "Combination blue(415 nm)and red(633 nm)LED phototherapy in the treatment of mild to severe acne vulgaris", J Cosmet Laser Ther, 8, pp.71~75 (2006)