Participants' Satisfaction with the Atopic Dermatitis Education Program: Assessing the Impact of Each Content Using Structural Equation Modeling
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Only a few studies have tried to assess factors relevant to the satisfaction of the participants in atopic dermatitis (AD) educational programs. More systematic modeling of this issue is needed. Objective: To examine the benefit of a conjoint educational program for AD on patients and caregivers in a clinical setting. Methods: In a half-day educational program called “AD school”, 831 people (493 patients and 338 family members) participated for 8 years. Various educational and entertaining programs were provided. The on-site survey was administered to measure participants’ satisfaction and perception of the benefit. We applied structural equation modeling to identify the relations among satisfaction and perception. Results: A total of 209 family survey data was obtained and analyzed. The survey items were grouped into four categories. The categories were classified as individual education, group education, fun activity, and overall satisfaction (fun, benefit, intention to re-join and recommend to others). According to the model that we built, comprehensive group education was demonstrated to be the most relevant factor affecting overall satisfaction. Conclusion: Our holistic approach would allow dermatologists to improve the efficacy of the conjoint educational program for AD.
Abstract
Background: Only a few studies have tried to assess factors relevant to the satisfaction of the participants in atopic dermatitis (AD) educational programs. More systematic modeling of this issue is needed. Objective: To examine the benefit of a conjoint educational program for AD on patients and caregivers in a clinical setting. Methods: In a half-day educational program called “AD school”, 831 people (493 patients and 338 family members) participated for 8 years. Various educational and entertaining programs were provided. The on-site survey was administered to measure participants’ satisfaction and perception of the benefit. We applied structural equation modeling to identify the relations among satisfaction and perception. Results: A total of 209 family survey data was obtained and analyzed. The survey items were grouped into four categories. The categories were classified as individual education, group education, fun activity, and overall satisfaction (fun, benefit, intention to re-join and recommend to others). According to the model that we built, comprehensive group education was demonstrated to be the most relevant factor affecting overall satisfaction. Conclusion: Our holistic approach would allow dermatologists to improve the efficacy of the conjoint educational program for AD.
참고문헌 (23)
- Weidinger S, "Atopic dermatitis", Nat Rev Dis Primers, 4, pp.1~ (2018)
- Boguniewicz M, "Atopic dermatitis: a disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation", Immunol Rev, 242, pp.233~246 (2011)
- Chinn DJ, "Randomized controlled trial of a single dermatology nurse consultation in primary care on the quality of life of children with atopic eczema", Br J Dermatol, 146, pp.432~439 (2002)
- Staab D, "Age related, structured educational programmes for the management of atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents: multicentre, randomised controlled trial", BMJ, 332, pp.933~938 (2006)
- Kupfer J, "Structured education program improves the coping with atopic dermatitis in children and their parents-a multicenter, randomized controlled trial", J Psychosom Res, 68, pp.353~358 (2010)
- Wenninger K, "Structured parent education in the management of childhood atopic dermatitis : the Berlin model", Patient Educ Couns, 40, pp.253~261 (2000)
- Beran TN, "Structural equation modeling in medical research : a primer", BMC Res Notes, 3, pp.267~ (2010)
- 장용현, "A Family-Engaged Educational Program for Atopic Dermatitis: A Seven-Year, Multicenter Experience in Daegu-Gyeongbuk, South Korea", Annals of Dermatology, 27(4), pp.383~388 (2015), 대한피부과학회
- Muthén LK, "Mplus user’s guide: statistical analysis with latent variables, user’s guide" (2017), Muthén & Muthén
- Bandalos DL, "The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences", pp.93~114 (2010), Routledge
- Kaplan D, "Structural equation modeling: foundations and extensions" (2009), Sage
- IBM, "IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 26.0", IBM, ~ (2019)
- Hu LT, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Struct Equ Modeling, 6, pp.1~55 (1999)
- Raykov T, "Behavioral scale reliability and measurement invariance evaluation using latent variable modeling", Behav Ther, 35, pp.299~331 (2004)
- Hancock GR, "Structural equation modeling: present and futurea festschrift in honor of Karl Joreskog", pp.195~216 (2001), Scientific Software International
- LeBovidge J, "Atopic dermatitis: therapeutic care delivery: therapeutic education, shared decision-making, and access to care", Semin Cutan Med Surg, 36, pp.131~136 (2017)
- Ricci G, "Three years of Italian experience of an educational program for parents of young children affected by atopic dermatitis:improving knowledge produces lower anxiety levels in parents of children with atopic dermatitis", Pediatr Dermatol, 26, pp.1~5 (2009)
- Futamura M, "Effects of a short-term parental education program on childhood atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled trial", Pediatr Dermatol, 30, pp.438~443 (2013)
- Soares JB, "Assessing overall patient satisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease using structural equation modeling", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 27, pp.941~950 (2015)
- Sahin B, "Factors affecting inpatient satisfaction: structural equation modeling", J Med Syst, 31, pp.9~16 (2007)
- Bieber T, "Clinical phenotypes and endophenotypes of atopic dermatitis: where are we, and where should we go?", J Allergy Clin Immunol, 139(4S), pp.S58~S64 (2017)
- Darsow U, "Difficult to control atopic dermatitis", World Allergy Organ J, 6, pp.6~ (2013)
- Tang TS, "Group education strategies for diabetes self-management", Diabetes Spectr, 19, pp.99~105 (2006)