수업평가에 나타난 학생들의 일관적 응답 경향 분석
A Trend Study of Student' Consistent Responses to Course Evaluation
1
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Most students choose the same option to questions in course evaluation surveys. Identical answers to each question render the results unreliable. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend of medical student' consistent responses to course evaluations. Methods: The data of this study were the results of a course evaluation over 3 years (from 2006 to 2008) at the School of Medicine at A University. Results: The proportion of students who replied with the same answers to each question was below 20%. This result was consistent in freshmen, sophomores, and junior students. Using a 5-point Likert scale, more than 40% of the students gave 5 points consistently. Conclusion: We conclude that student' responses to evaluations do not have a significant impact on the reliability of course evaluations at Medical School at A University. These results differ significantly from those of previous research. Hence, future studies are required to analyze course evaluations in medical schools using diverse aspects.
Abstract
Purpose: Most students choose the same option to questions in course evaluation surveys. Identical answers to each question render the results unreliable. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend of medical student' consistent responses to course evaluations. Methods: The data of this study were the results of a course evaluation over 3 years (from 2006 to 2008) at the School of Medicine at A University. Results: The proportion of students who replied with the same answers to each question was below 20%. This result was consistent in freshmen, sophomores, and junior students. Using a 5-point Likert scale, more than 40% of the students gave 5 points consistently. Conclusion: We conclude that student' responses to evaluations do not have a significant impact on the reliability of course evaluations at Medical School at A University. These results differ significantly from those of previous research. Hence, future studies are required to analyze course evaluations in medical schools using diverse aspects.
참고문헌 (10)
- 한신일, "한국대학의 강의평가실태 분석", 교육행정학연구, 23(3), pp.379~404 (2005), 한국교육행정학회
- 임소덕, "온라인 학생 강의평가에 대한 경험과 고찰", 한국의학교육, 20(4), pp.367~371 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
- 채수진, "국내 의과대학 강좌평가제 운영 실태 분석", 한국의학교육, 19(2), pp.133~142 (2007), 한국의학교육학회
- 김명화, "강의평가의 타당도와 신뢰도", 아시아교육연구, 6(3), pp.1~24 (2005), 교육연구소
- 홍경선, "대학교 강의평가에 나타난 일관적 응답 분석", 교육정보미디어연구, 12(2), pp.97~127 (2006), 한국교육정보미디어학회
- 김학일, "이공계 강의평가 결과의 실증적 분석을 통한 강의평가제도 개선방안", 공학교육연구, 10(4), pp.58~77 (2007), 한국공학교육학회
- Chae SJ, "The study on the validity and reliability of an instruction evaluation questionnaire", Korean J Med Educ, 14, pp.287~292 (2002)
- Park SG, "Student's response to current lecture evaluation method in one medical school", Korean J Med Educ, 15, pp.233~240 (2003)
- 채수진, "수업평가에 대한 교수와 학생 인식 비교-일개 의과대학 사례-", 한국의학교육, 20(2), pp.163~167 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
- Yang MK, "Students’ evaluations of university teaching: significance and problems", Stud Educ Pri, 13, pp.93~122 (2008)