의학교육에서 수업의 전문성 향상을 위한 ‘좋은 수업’의 요건 탐색
Investigation of the Requirements of ‘Good Teaching’ to Improve Teaching Professionalism in Medical Education
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to survey the awareness of faculty (F) and students (S) on 'good teaching' and to analyze an example of good lesson, finally to identify the requirements of 'good teaching' in medical education. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were applied simultaneously. First, survey using a questionnaire was analyzed by frequency analysis and verified using χ2 -test, Mann-Whitney test. Second, the case of good teaching and qualitative data were analyzed by 'priori codes coding' and 'open coding'. Results: The results of survey are as follows: Both faculty and students regarded lessons that taught important content easy to understand (F: 50%; S: 69.1%); Lessons that allow students make sure important information (F: 48.6%; S: 51.4%); Lessons that prepare and plan considering the student's level and interest (F: m=3.78; S: m=3.76) were good lessons. Faculty wanted lessons that improve student's academic achievement (35.7%), while students choose lessons that deliver curriculum effectively using appropriate teaching method (47.1%). According to the results of case analysis, it turned out that characteristics of good teaching were as follows: Thorough plan and preparation of content, various teaching methods and materials, encouragement of intellectual inquiry and curiosity, active interaction between faculty and students, clear feedback and reasonable evaluation. Conclusion: Requirements of good teaching are open to faculty at school of medicine and are to be utilized as guidelines to monitor and improve their instruction.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to survey the awareness of faculty (F) and students (S) on 'good teaching' and to analyze an example of good lesson, finally to identify the requirements of 'good teaching' in medical education. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative methods were applied simultaneously. First, survey using a questionnaire was analyzed by frequency analysis and verified using χ2 -test, Mann-Whitney test. Second, the case of good teaching and qualitative data were analyzed by 'priori codes coding' and 'open coding'. Results: The results of survey are as follows: Both faculty and students regarded lessons that taught important content easy to understand (F: 50%; S: 69.1%); Lessons that allow students make sure important information (F: 48.6%; S: 51.4%); Lessons that prepare and plan considering the student's level and interest (F: m=3.78; S: m=3.76) were good lessons. Faculty wanted lessons that improve student's academic achievement (35.7%), while students choose lessons that deliver curriculum effectively using appropriate teaching method (47.1%). According to the results of case analysis, it turned out that characteristics of good teaching were as follows: Thorough plan and preparation of content, various teaching methods and materials, encouragement of intellectual inquiry and curiosity, active interaction between faculty and students, clear feedback and reasonable evaluation. Conclusion: Requirements of good teaching are open to faculty at school of medicine and are to be utilized as guidelines to monitor and improve their instruction.
참고문헌 (20)
- Lee HJ, "Developing teaching materials for differentiated instruction in Korean middle school classrooms in the subject areas of Korean language & mathematics" (2001), Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
- 서경혜, "좋은 수업에 대한 관점과 개념: 교사와 학생 면담 연구", 교육과정연구, 22(4), pp.165~187 (2004), 한국교육과정학회
- Kang NY, "The cognition of elementary teacher on 'good teaching'", 석사, pp.2006
- Kang DH, "Improving the quality of Korean school education (II): a qualitative case study of good teaching in the secondary social studies", pp.180~194 (2002), Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
- Kim JH, "Improving the quality of Korean school education (II): a qualitative case study for good instruction in the secondary school", pp.10~74 (2002), Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation
- 곽영순, "좋은 수업에 대한 질적 연구: 중등 과학 수업을 중심으로", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(2), pp.144~154 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
- 소연희, "문제바탕학습시행에 따른 만족도", 한국의학교육, 17(1), pp.49~58 (2005), 한국의학교육학회
- Chung IW, "The practice and evaluation of problem-based learning in College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University", Korean J Med Educ, 11, pp.285~295 (1999)
- 조희경, "의료윤리 토론식 수업에 대한 학생들의 만족도 및 성취도", 한국의학교육, 21(3), pp.243~257 (2009), 한국의학교육학회
- Zemelman S, "Best practice: new standards for teaching and learning in America's schools" (1998), Heinemann
- Darty M, "Instructional modules: a paradigm shift in teaching", TechTrends, 43, pp.26~28 (1999)
- Slobody LB, "How to improve teaching in medical colleges", Acad Med, 25, pp.45~49 (1950)
- Pratt DD, "Reconsidering good teaching across the continuum of medical education", J Contin Educ Health Prof, 21, pp.70~81 (2001)
- Markert RJ, "What makes a good teacher? Lessons from teaching medical students", Acad Med, 76, pp.809~810 (2001)
- Jo EM, "A study on elementary school teachers' perspectives on good instructional practice", 석사, pp.2008
- Siedentop D, "Developing teaching skills in physical education. 4th ed. Mountain View" (2000), Mayfield
- Lee HS, "A comparative study of instructional skills in physical education between effective and beginning elementary school teachers", 석사, pp.2003
- Dewey J, "The child and the curriculum: experience and education" (2002), Moonumsa
- Lim BD, "Indirect delivery of Kierkegaard" (1998), Education Science Company
- Choi SH, "A qualitative case study on good mathematics teaching in secondary schools", pp.200~217 (2002), Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation