Characteristics of medical teachers using student-centered teaching methods
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study investigated characteristics of medical teachers who have adopted student-centered teaching methods into their teaching. Methods: A 24-item questionnaire consisted of respondent backgrounds, his or her use of student-centered teaching methods, and awareness of the school’s educational objectives and curricular principles was administered of faculty members at a private medical school in Korea. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were conducted to compare faculty use of student-centered approaches across different backgrounds and awareness of curricular principles. Results: Overall response rate was 70% (N=140/200), approximately 25% (n=34) of whom were using student-centered teaching methods. Distributions in the faculty use of student-centered teaching methods were significantly higher among basic sciences faculty (versus clinical sciences faculty), with teaching experiences of over 10 years (versus less than 10 years), and who were aware of the school’s educational objectives and curricular principles. Conclusion: Our study indicates differences in medical faculty’s practice of student-centered teaching across disciplines, teaching experiences, and their understanding of the school’s educational objectives curricular principles. These findings have implications for faculty development and institutional support to better promote faculty use of student-centered teaching approaches.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated characteristics of medical teachers who have adopted student-centered teaching methods into their teaching. Methods: A 24-item questionnaire consisted of respondent backgrounds, his or her use of student-centered teaching methods, and awareness of the school’s educational objectives and curricular principles was administered of faculty members at a private medical school in Korea. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were conducted to compare faculty use of student-centered approaches across different backgrounds and awareness of curricular principles. Results: Overall response rate was 70% (N=140/200), approximately 25% (n=34) of whom were using student-centered teaching methods. Distributions in the faculty use of student-centered teaching methods were significantly higher among basic sciences faculty (versus clinical sciences faculty), with teaching experiences of over 10 years (versus less than 10 years), and who were aware of the school’s educational objectives and curricular principles. Conclusion: Our study indicates differences in medical faculty’s practice of student-centered teaching across disciplines, teaching experiences, and their understanding of the school’s educational objectives curricular principles. These findings have implications for faculty development and institutional support to better promote faculty use of student-centered teaching approaches.
참고문헌 (6)
- Harden RM, "Educational strategies in curriculum development : the SPICES model", Med Educ, 18(4), pp.284~297 (1984)
- Harden RM, "Be FAIR to students : four principles that lead to more effective learning", Med Teach, 35(1), pp.27~31 (2013)
- Srinivasan M, ""Teaching as a competency" : competencies for medical educators", Acad Med, 86(10), pp.1211~1220 (2011)
- Jacobs JC, "Teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching in student-centred medical curricula : the impact of context and personal characteristics", BMC Med Educ, 16(1), pp.244~ (2016)
- Jacobs JC, "Impact of institute and person variables on teachers’ conceptions of learning and teaching", Med Teach, 37(8), pp.738~746 (2015)
- De Rijdt C, "Influencing variables and moderators of transfer of learning to the workplace within the area of staff development in higher education : research review", Educ Res Rev, 8, pp.48~74 (2013)
