의과대학 교수와 학생이 인식한 학습성과에 대한 교육수준과 도달수준의 차이
The perceptual differences in learning outcomes between education and achievement levels between faculty and students in medical schools
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the perception of learning outcomes between faculty and students in medicalschools. Methods: A total of 1,766 medical students and 436 faculty members participated in the survey. They responded to the perceptionof four learning outcomes: medical knowledge and problem solving, clinical skills, medical ethics, and clinical communication. Theparticipants responded to the education and achievement levels of the learning outcomes. Results: In all four learning outcomes, the student's perception of education level differed by educational system, and the studentsin mixed systems had the highest scores. Students differed significantly in achievement level of medical ethics between genders, whereinmale students perceived their achievement level to be higher than females. Students perceived their achievement level to be lowerthan the education level. The students' clinical skills were the highest in the education and achievement levels. The faculty perceivedthe education level to be higher than the student's achievement level. In particular, the faculty's perception of education level of medicalknowledge and problem solving was the highest, whereas the students' achievement level of it was lower. The faculty assessed theeducation level to be higher than students. The students showed higher perception of achievement level than faculty. Conclusion: There were perceptual differences in learning outcomes between students and faculty. The results of this study areexpected to be used to design outcome-based learning methods.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the perception of learning outcomes between faculty and students in medicalschools. Methods: A total of 1,766 medical students and 436 faculty members participated in the survey. They responded to the perceptionof four learning outcomes: medical knowledge and problem solving, clinical skills, medical ethics, and clinical communication. Theparticipants responded to the education and achievement levels of the learning outcomes. Results: In all four learning outcomes, the student's perception of education level differed by educational system, and the studentsin mixed systems had the highest scores. Students differed significantly in achievement level of medical ethics between genders, whereinmale students perceived their achievement level to be higher than females. Students perceived their achievement level to be lowerthan the education level. The students' clinical skills were the highest in the education and achievement levels. The faculty perceivedthe education level to be higher than the student's achievement level. In particular, the faculty's perception of education level of medicalknowledge and problem solving was the highest, whereas the students' achievement level of it was lower. The faculty assessed theeducation level to be higher than students. The students showed higher perception of achievement level than faculty. Conclusion: There were perceptual differences in learning outcomes between students and faculty. The results of this study areexpected to be used to design outcome-based learning methods.
참고문헌 (19)
- Hwang K, "Clinical performance assessment as a model of Korean medical licensure examination", Korean J Med Educ, 13, pp.277~287 (2001)
- Jolly BC, "Relationships between students' clinical experiences in introductory clinical courses and their performances on an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE)", Acad Med, 71, pp.909~916 (1996)
- Dent JA, "practical guide for medical teachers" (2001), Churchill Livingstone
- "How to write learning outcomes" (1996)[URL]
- Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation, "Guidelines for accreditation of medical education in Korea"
- Park KH., "A study on the development and validation of the self-efficacy scale on clinical performance for medical students", pp.2012
- Ashoorion V, "Do interns achieve learning outcomes up to faculty members’expectations?", J Med Educ, 10, pp.47~53 (2006)
- Smith S, "Finding effective strategies for teaching ethics: a comparison trial of two interventions", Acad Med, 79, pp.265~271 (2004)
- Cheong YS., "Quality improvement strategies of medical ethics education in Korea", Hanyang Med Rev, 32, pp.30~34 (2012)
- Das M, "Self and tutor evaluations in problem-based learning tutorials: is there a relationship?", Med Educ, 32, pp.411~418 (1998)
- Weiss PM, "How do medical student self-assessments compare with their final clerkship grades?", Med Teach, 27, pp.445~449 (2005)
- McCrorie P., "Graduate students are more challenging, demanding, and questioning", BMJ, 325, pp.676~ (2002)
- Dahlin ME, "Burnout and psychiatric morbidity among medical students entering clinical training : a three year prospective questionnaire and interviewbased study", BMC Med Educ, 7, pp.6~ (2007)
- Rees CE, "A qualitative study to explore undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards communication skills learning", Med Teach, 24, pp.289~293 (2002)
- Kaufman DM, "Differences in medical students' attitudes and self-efficacy regarding patient-doctor communication", Acad Med, 76, pp.188~ (2001)
- Cleland J, "Undergraduate students'attitudes to communication skills learning differ depending on year of study and gender", Med Teach, 27, pp.246~251 (2005)
- Cohen A, "Development of competence in clerkship", Med Teach, 12, pp.47~55 (1990)
- Shokooh F, "Comparing faculty and students perceptions on clinical competency achievement in rehabilitation programs", Iranian Rehabil J, 7, pp.20~24 (2009)
- Ahn DS., "County report (Korea) on the global role of the doctor in healthcare" (2012), Research Institute for Healthcare Policy