DUR 제도 및 DUR 고도화 시범사업에 대한 인식 탐구: 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 기법 중심의 질적 연구
Exploring the Perception on Drug Utilization Review System and DUR Modernization Pilot Project: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Group Interviews
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To explore the perception of drug utilization review (DUR) system and DUR modernization pilot project among healthcare professionals and patients. Methods: We conducted 8 times of focus group interviews (FGI) between August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The healthcare professionals and patients who participated in the DUR modernization pilot project were included in the present study. Based on the type of project participation or medical institution, the participants were divided into the following four groups: group 1, hospital; group 2, clinic; group 3, pharmacy; and group 4, patient. Within each group, interviews were conducted under a pre-defined agenda to identify the implicit perceptions of the participants; the contents of the interviews were, then, categorized. Results: Healthcare professionals established a consensus on the positive aspects of the DUR system and DUR modernization pilot project. However, substantial concerns remain, such as additional workload associated with monitoring adverse events or acquiring consents from patients. Furthermore, a difference of opinion over the DUR convenience system was observed. Among 3 DUR convenience system, the personal medication history review service was highly utilized, but pop-up hold function and communication system was rarely used. Conclusion: We observed that systematic intervention using the DUR system is effective for both healthcare providers and consumers. Adverse events caused by inappropriate drug use can be prevented by continuous patient monitoring. Therefore, the role of DUR system needs to be expanded to establish a safe drug management system.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the perception of drug utilization review (DUR) system and DUR modernization pilot project among healthcare professionals and patients. Methods: We conducted 8 times of focus group interviews (FGI) between August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The healthcare professionals and patients who participated in the DUR modernization pilot project were included in the present study. Based on the type of project participation or medical institution, the participants were divided into the following four groups: group 1, hospital; group 2, clinic; group 3, pharmacy; and group 4, patient. Within each group, interviews were conducted under a pre-defined agenda to identify the implicit perceptions of the participants; the contents of the interviews were, then, categorized. Results: Healthcare professionals established a consensus on the positive aspects of the DUR system and DUR modernization pilot project. However, substantial concerns remain, such as additional workload associated with monitoring adverse events or acquiring consents from patients. Furthermore, a difference of opinion over the DUR convenience system was observed. Among 3 DUR convenience system, the personal medication history review service was highly utilized, but pop-up hold function and communication system was rarely used. Conclusion: We observed that systematic intervention using the DUR system is effective for both healthcare providers and consumers. Adverse events caused by inappropriate drug use can be prevented by continuous patient monitoring. Therefore, the role of DUR system needs to be expanded to establish a safe drug management system.
참고문헌 (17)
- "WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators: A Practical Manual For the Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Systems"[URL]
- "WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge:Medication Without Harm"[URL]
- Jung DG, "Achievements and chanllenges of Drug Utilization Review system", HIRA Research, 13(2), pp.12~21 (2019)
- Kim DS, "Drug Utilization Review system Implementation Plan for Medication Use in Geriatrics", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), ~ (2014)
- Park BJ, "Long-term research plan for strategic development of DUR Information", Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management(KIDS), 145~ (2014)
- Retrospective drug utilization review on medicine abuse and DUR contraindicated medicines, "Koo BK", Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management (KIDS), 353~ (2015)
- Establishing the basis for retrospective analysis of drug adverse effects and monitoring system, "Kim DS", Health Insurance Review &Assessment Service (HIRA), 276~ (2018)
- "Establishment of patient safety platform through drug use monitoring system"[URL]
- 송주은, "포커스 그룹 연구방법을 적용한초산모의 산후조리원 이용 경험 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 21(3), pp.184~196 (2015), 한국여성건강간호학회
- Kitzinger J, "Qualitative Research : Introducing focus groups", BMJ, 311, pp.299~ (1995)
- Lee SS, "Teachers’ perception of learning disabilities : A focus group study with general and special education teachers", Journal of Special Education, 20, pp.113~137 (2008)
- Bengtsson M, "How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis", NursingPlus Open, 2, pp.8~14 (2016)
- "Health Care Resources" (2020)[URL]
- 이찬희, "외래 초진환자의 만족진료시간과 관련 추가 비용 지불 의사", 보건행정학회지, 27(1), pp.39~46 (2017), 한국보건행정학회
- "WHO High 5s: Standaed Operating Procedures" (2014)[URL]
- Baseman JG, "Public health communications and alert fatigue", BMC Health Serv Res, 13, pp.295~ (2013)
- Stevenson FA, "Doctorpatient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making", Soc Sci Med, 50(6), pp.829~840 (2000)