본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

의사면허국가시험 출제문제 공개에 관한 인식

Perceptions on item disclosure for the Korean medical licensing examination

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: This study analyzed the perceptions of medical students and faculty regarding disclosure of test items on the Korean medical licensing examination. Methods: I conducted a survey of medical students from medical colleges and professional medical schools nationwide. Responses were analyzed from 718 participants as well as 69 faculty members who participated in creating the medical licensing examination item sets. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. Results: It is important to maintain test quality and to keep the test items unavailable to the public. There are also concerns among students that disclosure of test items would prompt increasing difficulty of test items (48.3%). Further, few students found it desirable to disclose test items regardless of any considerations (28.5%). The professors, who had experience in designing the test items, also expressed their opposition to test item disclosure (60.9%). Conclusion: It is desirable not to disclose the test items of the Korean medical licensing examination to the public on the condition that students are provided with a sufficient amount of information regarding the examination. This is so that the exam can appropriately identify candidates with the required qualifications.

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzed the perceptions of medical students and faculty regarding disclosure of test items on the Korean medical licensing examination. Methods: I conducted a survey of medical students from medical colleges and professional medical schools nationwide. Responses were analyzed from 718 participants as well as 69 faculty members who participated in creating the medical licensing examination item sets. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. Results: It is important to maintain test quality and to keep the test items unavailable to the public. There are also concerns among students that disclosure of test items would prompt increasing difficulty of test items (48.3%). Further, few students found it desirable to disclose test items regardless of any considerations (28.5%). The professors, who had experience in designing the test items, also expressed their opposition to test item disclosure (60.9%). Conclusion: It is desirable not to disclose the test items of the Korean medical licensing examination to the public on the condition that students are provided with a sufficient amount of information regarding the examination. This is so that the exam can appropriately identify candidates with the required qualifications.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Hale GA, "Effects of item disclosure on TOEFL performance" (1980), Education Testing Service
  2. Bower DR, "Test disclosure and bias issues : the New York experience", Fed Bull, 74, pp.197~202 (1987)
  3. Gilmer JS, "The effects of test disclosure on equated scores and pass rates", Appl Psychol Meas, 13, pp.245~255 (1989)
  4. Stricker LJ, "Test disclosure and retest performance on the SAT", Appl Psychol Meas, 8, pp.81~87 (1984)
  5. Powers DE, "Effects of preexamination disclosure of essay topics", Appl Meas Educ, 11, pp.139~157 (1998)
  6. Wood TJ, "The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 14, pp.465~473 (2009)
  7. Green BF, "Issues in testing: coaching, disclosure, and ethnic bias" (1981), Jossey-Bass
  8. Espinoza LG, "The LSAT : narratives and bias", J Gend Law, 1, pp.121~164 (1993)
  9. Greer D, "Legal issues in truth-in-testing legislation", Rev High Ed, 7, pp.321~356 (1984)
  10. 박종우, "2007 의사국가시험과 2006 한국의과대학장협의회 의과대학 학습목표의 불일치", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 20(1), pp.85~90 (2008), 한국의학교육학회
  11. American Educational Research Association, "Standards for educational and psychological testing", American Educational Research Association, ~ (2014)
  12. California Department of Consumer Affairs, "What a licensing board member needs to know about testing", California Department of Consumer Affairs, ~ (1983)
  13. Educational Testing Service, "ETS standards for quality and fairness", Educational Testing Service, ~ (2002)
  14. Bersoff DN, "Testing and the law", Am Psychol, 36, pp.1047~1056 (1981)
  15. Study on validity of item disclosure for medical licensing examination in Korea, "Yang EB", National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board, ~ (2014)
  16. Federation of State Medical Boards, "Bulletin of information", Federation of State Medical Boards, ~ (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)