Is it possible to introduce an interview to the Korean Medical Licensing Examination to assess professional attributes?: a survey-based observational study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to gather opinions from medical educators on the possibility of introducing an interview to the KoreanMedical Licensing Examination (KMLE) to assess professional attributes. Specifically following topics were dealt with: the appropriatetiming and tool to assess unprofessional conduct; the possiblity of prevention of unprofessional conduct by introducing an interview tothe KMLE; and the possibility of implementation of an interview to the KMLE. Methods: A cross-sectional study approach based on a survey questionnaire was adopted. We analyzed 104 pieces of news about doctors’ unprofessional conduct to determine the deficient professional attributes. We derived 24 items of unprofessional conduct and developed the questionnaire and surveyed 250 members of the Korean Society of Medical Education 2 times. Descriptive statistics,cross-tabulation analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied to the responses. The answers to the open-ended questions were analyzedusing conventional content analysis. Results: In the survey, 49 members (19.6%) responded. Out of 49, 24 (49.5%) responded in the 2nd survey. To assess unprofessionalconduct, there was no dominant timing among basic medical education (BME), KMLE, and continuing professional development(CPD). There was no overwhelming assessment tool among written examination, objective structured clinical examination, practiceobservation, and interview. Response rates of “impossible” (49.0%) and “possible” (42.9%) suggested an interview of the KMLE prevented unprofessional conduct. In terms of implementation, “impossible” (50.0%) was selected more often than “possible” (33.3%). Conclusion: Professional attributes should be assessed by various tools over the period from BME to CPD. Hence, it may be impossible to introduce an interview to assess professional attributes to the KMLE, and a system is needed such as self-regulation by the professional body rather than licensing examination.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to gather opinions from medical educators on the possibility of introducing an interview to the KoreanMedical Licensing Examination (KMLE) to assess professional attributes. Specifically following topics were dealt with: the appropriatetiming and tool to assess unprofessional conduct; the possiblity of prevention of unprofessional conduct by introducing an interview tothe KMLE; and the possibility of implementation of an interview to the KMLE. Methods: A cross-sectional study approach based on a survey questionnaire was adopted. We analyzed 104 pieces of news about doctors’ unprofessional conduct to determine the deficient professional attributes. We derived 24 items of unprofessional conduct and developed the questionnaire and surveyed 250 members of the Korean Society of Medical Education 2 times. Descriptive statistics,cross-tabulation analysis, and Fisher’s exact test were applied to the responses. The answers to the open-ended questions were analyzedusing conventional content analysis. Results: In the survey, 49 members (19.6%) responded. Out of 49, 24 (49.5%) responded in the 2nd survey. To assess unprofessionalconduct, there was no dominant timing among basic medical education (BME), KMLE, and continuing professional development(CPD). There was no overwhelming assessment tool among written examination, objective structured clinical examination, practiceobservation, and interview. Response rates of “impossible” (49.0%) and “possible” (42.9%) suggested an interview of the KMLE prevented unprofessional conduct. In terms of implementation, “impossible” (50.0%) was selected more often than “possible” (33.3%). Conclusion: Professional attributes should be assessed by various tools over the period from BME to CPD. Hence, it may be impossible to introduce an interview to assess professional attributes to the KMLE, and a system is needed such as self-regulation by the professional body rather than licensing examination.
참고문헌 (13)
- "Medical licensing examination personality interview should be introduced to strengthen qualification screening" (2018)[URL]
- Kwon DH, "Educational evaluation", pp.334~357 (2016), Hakjisa
- 김명화, "인성 교육을 위한 정의적 특성 평가 재조명: 교육연구에서 최근 경향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(11), pp.981~1000 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- Chestnut DH, "On the road to professionalism", Anesthesiology, 126, pp.780~786 (2017)[DOI]
- Mahajan R, "Professionalism and ethics : a proposed curriculum for undergraduates", Int J Appl Basic Med Res, 6, pp.157~163 (2016)[DOI]
- Li H, "Assessing medical professionalism : a systematic review of instruments and their measurement properties", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0177321~ (2017)[DOI]
- Tay KT, "Assessing professionalism in medicine : a scoping review of assessment tools from 1990 to 2018", J Med Educ Curric Dev, 7 (2020)[DOI]
- FLANAGAN JC, "The critical incident technique", Psychol Bull, 51, pp.327~358 (1954)[DOI]
- Gremler DD, "The critical incident technique in service research", J Serv Res, 7, pp.65~89 (2004)[DOI]
- Hsieh HF, "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis", Qual Health Res, 15, pp.1277~1288 (2005)[DOI]
- "The medical license; focusing on the national examination system for granting a medical license in 8 countries including Korea" (2021)[URL]
- Wynia MK, "The role of professionalism and self-regulation in detecting impaired or incompetent physicians", JAMA, 304, pp.210~212 (2010)[DOI]
- 이얼, "캐나다 온타리오 주 보건의료인 면허관리법 분석과 시사점", 미국헌법연구, 31(3), pp.39~70 (2020), 미국헌법학회
