Usefulness of 360 degree evaluation in evaluating nursing students in Iran
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nursing BSc program in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools included demographic questionnaire and students’ evaluation questionnaire, to evaluate “professional behavior” and “clinical skills” in pediatric ward. Every student got evaluated from clinical instructor, students, peers, clinical nurses, and children’s mothers’ point of view. Data analysis was done with descriptive and analytic statistics test including Pearson coefficient using SPSS version 18.0. Results: The evaluation mean scores were as following: students, 89.74±6.17; peers, 94.12±6.87; children’s mothers, 92.87±6.21; clinical instructor, 84.01±8.81; and the nurses, 94.87±6.35. The results showed a significant correlation between evaluation scores of peers, clinical instructor and self-evaluation (Pearson coefficient, p<0.001), but the correlation between the nurses’ evaluation score and that of the clinical instructor was not significant (Pearson coefficient, p=0.052). Conclusion: 360 Degree evaluation can provide additional useful information on student performance and evaluation of different perspectives of care. The use of this method is recommended for clinical evaluation of nursing students.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical nursing students using 360 degree evaluation. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study that conducted between September 2014 and February 2015, 28 students who were selected by census from those who were passing the last semester of the Nursing BSc program in Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Data collection tools included demographic questionnaire and students’ evaluation questionnaire, to evaluate “professional behavior” and “clinical skills” in pediatric ward. Every student got evaluated from clinical instructor, students, peers, clinical nurses, and children’s mothers’ point of view. Data analysis was done with descriptive and analytic statistics test including Pearson coefficient using SPSS version 18.0. Results: The evaluation mean scores were as following: students, 89.74±6.17; peers, 94.12±6.87; children’s mothers, 92.87±6.21; clinical instructor, 84.01±8.81; and the nurses, 94.87±6.35. The results showed a significant correlation between evaluation scores of peers, clinical instructor and self-evaluation (Pearson coefficient, p<0.001), but the correlation between the nurses’ evaluation score and that of the clinical instructor was not significant (Pearson coefficient, p=0.052). Conclusion: 360 Degree evaluation can provide additional useful information on student performance and evaluation of different perspectives of care. The use of this method is recommended for clinical evaluation of nursing students.
참고문헌 (12)
- Goldstein R, "A perspective on 360-degree evaluations", J Pediatr, 156(1-2), pp.e1~e2 (2010)
- Massagli TL, "Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 86, pp.845~852 (2007)
- Calhoun AW, "Multirater feedback with gap analysis: an innovative means to assess communication skill and self-insight", Patient Educ Couns, 80, pp.321~326 (2010)
- NakhaeeN, "360-Degree evaluation method in clinical evaluation of residents: a pilot study on feasibility, validity and reliability", Strides Dev Med Educ, 7, pp.99~103 (2011)
- Baharvand P, "The assessment of 360-degree instrument’s validity and reliability for evaluation of medical students’ performance", J Med Edu Dev, 5, pp.1~6 (2013)
- Shojaee F, "Promotion assessment of nursing students’ group activities through self and peer assessment method", Iran J Med Educ, 10, pp.512~514 (2011)
- Mehrdad N, "Nursing students’ practical skills: self-, peer and teacher evaluation, complementary or contradictory", J Nurs Educ, 1, pp.61~69 (2012)
- Pazargadi M, "Multi-rater evaluation in the clinical evaluation of nursing students: instructors’ experiences and viewpoints", J Qual Res Health Sci, 1, pp.102~111 (2012)
- Sokhan GA, "Comparison of self, peer, and clinical teacher evaluation in clinical skills evaluation process of midwifery students", Iran J Med Educ, 10, pp.333~339 (2011)
- Hemalatha R, "Using multiple assessors to evaluate core competencies of nursing students: a 360 evaluation approach", Nitte Univ J Health Sci, 3, pp.13~17 (2013)
- Ogunyemi D, "From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents", J Contin Educ Health Prof, 29, pp.105~110 (2009)
- Joshi R, "Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents’ competency in interpersonal and communication skills", Acad Med, 79, pp.458~463 (2004)