Transnational collaboration for faculty development in health professions education in Mongolia
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences is the only national university in Mongolia and has produced more than 90% of health professionals in the country. Experts from Mongolia and Korea embarked on a collaborative effort to develop educational programs for faculty development based on the personal and professional needs of faculty members. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of those educational programs to determine whether this transnational collaboration was successful. Methods: A needs assessment survey was conducted among 325 faculty members. Based on the results of this survey, the joint expert team developed educational programs on seven core topics: clinical teaching, curriculum development, e-learning, item writing, medical research, organizational culture, and resident selection. Surveys evaluating the satisfaction and the attitudes of the participants were conducted for each program. Results: Throughout the 17-day program, 16 experts from Korea and 14 faculty members from Mongolia participated as instructors, and a total of 309 participants attended the program. The average satisfaction score was 7.15 out of 8.0, and the attitudes of the participants towards relevant competencies significantly improved after each educational program. Conclusion: The faculty development programs that were developed and implemented as part of this transnational collaboration between Mongolia and Korea are expected to contribute to the further improvement of health professions education in Mongolia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these educational programs.
Abstract
Purpose: The Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences is the only national university in Mongolia and has produced more than 90% of health professionals in the country. Experts from Mongolia and Korea embarked on a collaborative effort to develop educational programs for faculty development based on the personal and professional needs of faculty members. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of those educational programs to determine whether this transnational collaboration was successful. Methods: A needs assessment survey was conducted among 325 faculty members. Based on the results of this survey, the joint expert team developed educational programs on seven core topics: clinical teaching, curriculum development, e-learning, item writing, medical research, organizational culture, and resident selection. Surveys evaluating the satisfaction and the attitudes of the participants were conducted for each program. Results: Throughout the 17-day program, 16 experts from Korea and 14 faculty members from Mongolia participated as instructors, and a total of 309 participants attended the program. The average satisfaction score was 7.15 out of 8.0, and the attitudes of the participants towards relevant competencies significantly improved after each educational program. Conclusion: The faculty development programs that were developed and implemented as part of this transnational collaboration between Mongolia and Korea are expected to contribute to the further improvement of health professions education in Mongolia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of these educational programs.
참고문헌 (20)
- Campbell J, "Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage", Bull World Health Organ, 91, pp.853~863 (2013)
- Alkan ML, "The global medical school, 2020", Med Teach, 22, pp.527~530 (2000)
- Mahat A, "Assessment of graduate public health education in Nepal and perceived needs of faculty and students", Hum Resour Health, 11, pp.16~ (2013)
- Kim DH, "Evaluation of an international faculty development program for developing countries in Asia: the Seoul Intensive Course for Medical Educators", BMC Med Educ, 15, pp.224~ (2015)
- Steinert Y, "Faculty development in the new millennium: key challenges and future directions", Med Teach, 22, pp.44~50 (2000)
- Gwee MC, "APMEC 2014. Optimising collaboration in medical education: building bridges connecting minds", Med Educ, 47, pp.3~4 (2013)
- Harden RM, "International medical education and future directions: a global perspective", Acad Med, 81(12 Suppl), pp.S22~S29 (2006)
- Burdick W, "A model for linkage between health professions education and health: FAIMER international faculty development initiatives", Med Teach, 33, pp.632~637 (2011)
- Burdick WP, "Measuring the effects of an international health professions faculty development fellowship: the FAIMER Institute", Med Teach, 32, pp.414~421 (2010)
- Cooperrider DL, "Appreciative inquiry: a positive revolution in change", pp.1~21 (2005), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
- Kirkpatrick DL, "Evaluating training programs: the four levels", pp.19~47 (1998), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
- Gedikli B, "The role of leadership in the success of participatory planning processes experience from Turkey", Eur Urban Reg Stud, 16, pp.115~130 (2009)
- Bland CJ, "Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed", Acad Med, 75, pp.575~594 (2000)
- Gale R, "AMEE medical education guide no. 10. Managing change in a medical context: guidelines for action", Med Teach, 19, pp.239~249 (1997)
- Kern DE, "Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach", pp.4~98 (2009), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Hill F, "Negotiating strategic direction for education staff development: the Southampton experience", Med Teach, 26, pp.645~649 (2004)
- McLean M, "Faculty development: yesterday, today and tomorrow", Med Teach, 30, pp.555~584 (2008)
- Steinert Y, "Faculty development: if you build it, they will come", Med Educ, 44, pp.900~907 (2010)
- Wong JG, "Developing teaching skills for medical educators in Russia: a cross-cultural faculty development project", Med Educ, 41, pp.318~324 (2007)
- Skeff KM, "Faculty development: a resource for clinical teachers", J Gen Intern Med, 12(Suppl 2), pp.S56~S63 (1997)