6년제 약대 학제시스템 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 및 향후 전략
Analysis of Factors Related to the Students’ Satisfaction on 6-year Pharmacy Program and Strategic Planning
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The pharmacy education system in South Korea has changed from four-year degree program to two-yearpre-pharmacy program plus four-year professional degree program (a total of six years) since 2009. Objectives: The purposeof this study is to assess final year student’s satisfaction on this new pharmacy education system and to explore factorsrelated to student satisfaction. Methods: A paper-and-pencil survey instrument was administered to all final yearpharmacy students at four universities located in South Korea during September of 2014. The self-administered questionnairecontained 39 items. In part 1, the quality of education with regards to school utilities, education system, humanresources, and communication domains were measured. In part 2, overall satisfactions with the new education systemwere asked to students. Responses were recorded on a seven point Likert scale. Results: A total of 207 students wereparticipated in this study. Students showed low satisfaction on school utilities and standardization of education while theydisplayed high level of satisfaction on the quality of the faculty members and preceptors at clerkship sites. Factor analysisshowed that education service was the most significant factor that affects students’ satisfaction followed by facilities,standardized education, communication, administration, pharmacy practice (p<0.05). Conclusion: The qualification of facultyand preceptors ranked number one in students’ satisfaction and it was the most significant factor. School facilitieswere found to be the second most significant factor in students’ satisfaction while students displayed poor satisfaction. The study results might need to be reflected in future education planning to improve students’ satisfaction.
Abstract
Background: The pharmacy education system in South Korea has changed from four-year degree program to two-yearpre-pharmacy program plus four-year professional degree program (a total of six years) since 2009. Objectives: The purposeof this study is to assess final year student’s satisfaction on this new pharmacy education system and to explore factorsrelated to student satisfaction. Methods: A paper-and-pencil survey instrument was administered to all final yearpharmacy students at four universities located in South Korea during September of 2014. The self-administered questionnairecontained 39 items. In part 1, the quality of education with regards to school utilities, education system, humanresources, and communication domains were measured. In part 2, overall satisfactions with the new education systemwere asked to students. Responses were recorded on a seven point Likert scale. Results: A total of 207 students wereparticipated in this study. Students showed low satisfaction on school utilities and standardization of education while theydisplayed high level of satisfaction on the quality of the faculty members and preceptors at clerkship sites. Factor analysisshowed that education service was the most significant factor that affects students’ satisfaction followed by facilities,standardized education, communication, administration, pharmacy practice (p<0.05). Conclusion: The qualification of facultyand preceptors ranked number one in students’ satisfaction and it was the most significant factor. School facilitieswere found to be the second most significant factor in students’ satisfaction while students displayed poor satisfaction. The study results might need to be reflected in future education planning to improve students’ satisfaction.
참고문헌 (19)
- Jung H, "The origin of College of Pharmacy at Seoul National University, Found the starting point of modern pharmacy education", Korea Pharmaceutical Association News. Nov. 4, 2014, ~ (2014)
- Choi Y., "Ministry of Education, Final confirmaiton of 6 year pharmacy program", Pharmacy News, ~ (2005)
- Park NY., "Report of 35 pharmacy schools", Korea Institute for Pharmaceutical Policy Affairs, 6(1), pp.1~137 (2011)
- "Presentation of Standard education system of 6 year pharmacy program at final report meeting"[URL]
- 강만수, "교육서비스품질에 대한 한국의 국립대학과 사립대학의 경쟁모델 비교", 고객만족경영연구, 13(2), pp.201~219 (2011), 한국고객만족경영학회
- 강만수, "대학교육기관 교육서비스품질에 대한 한국, 일본, 몽골과 중국의 경쟁모델 비교", 통계연구, 17(1), pp.96~121 (2012), 통계청[DOI]
- 정유리, "교육서비스품질, 학생만족 및 학교충성도간 관계 연구: 관광관련학과 특수대학원생을 중심으로", 관광연구, 23(2), pp.139~155 (2008), 대한관광경영학회
- Seo BW., "An Exploratory Study on College Education for the Measurement of Service Quality and Satisfaction", Journal of Employment and Career, 2(1), pp.45~65 (2012)
- Zeithaml VA., "Communication and Control Process in the Delivery of Service Quality", The Journal of Marketing, 52, pp.35~48 (1988)
- Devellis RF., "Scale development (2nd ed.)" (2003), Sage
- Churchill GA. Jr., "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs", Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), pp.64~73 (1979)
- Creswell JW, "Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research" (2007), Sage
- Hair JF, "Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective" (2010), Pearson
- 신수영, "약대생의 약료에 대한 인식과 실무실습-진로선택의 상관성에 관한 연구", 한국임상약학회지, 24(2), pp.80~89 (2014), 한국임상약학회
- 장민정, "6년제 약학대학에서의 필수실무실습 현황과 평가 - 병원약국실무실습 중심으로 -", 한국임상약학회지, 23(4), pp.300~306 (2013), 한국임상약학회
- Athiyaman A., "Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions : the case of university education", European Journal of Marketing, 31(7), pp.528~540 (1997)
- Kara A., "Business student satisfaction, intentions and retention in higher education : An empirical investigation", Marketing Education Quarterly, 3(1), pp.1~25 (2004)
- Chen SH., "The development of an employee satisfaction model for higher education", The TQM Magazine, 18(5), pp.484~500 (2006)
- Graf LA., "Importance-satisfaction analysis : a diagnostic tool for organizational change", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 13(6), pp.8~12 (1992)