본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Beginning of outcome-based medical education: development of medical schools’ mission statements based on stakeholders’ priority

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Background: Many studies report the positive effects of outcome-based education in improving medical education quality. An important aspect of outcome-based education is the statement of learning outcomes, which is closely associated with medical schools’ mission, vision, and educational goals. Medical schools’ mission statement not only sets the standards to determine educational goals and outcomes but also provides an indicator to monitor and evaluate medical education quality.Purpose: This study identified a methodology to provide optimal mission statements at medical schools through the framework of suggested decision-making method.Methods: This study analyzed the focus of the mission development suggested by World Federation for Medical Education and Liaison Committee on Medical Education medical education standards and searched for appropriate decision-making methods based on these standards. In addition to validate the suggested framework of mission statement, case analysis of medical schools was conducted.Results: Consequently, a mission development method that applies the mission statement based on stakeholders’ priority (MSSP) was derived. The MSSP involves (1) content analysis, (2) candidate extraction, (3) priority evaluation, and (4) priority validation. The keywords of the mission system derived during this process were categorized and listed in ranks to be suggested as the mission, vision, and core values. The proposed MSSP was applied in two South Korean medical schools and, thereby, the mission, vision, and core values were determined for each medical school.Conclusion: The two schools’ case analysis verified MSSP’s effectiveness as a decision-making methodology to gather and converge diverse opinions from stakeholders for the mission statement at the medical schools.

Abstract

Background: Many studies report the positive effects of outcome-based education in improving medical education quality. An important aspect of outcome-based education is the statement of learning outcomes, which is closely associated with medical schools’ mission, vision, and educational goals. Medical schools’ mission statement not only sets the standards to determine educational goals and outcomes but also provides an indicator to monitor and evaluate medical education quality.Purpose: This study identified a methodology to provide optimal mission statements at medical schools through the framework of suggested decision-making method.Methods: This study analyzed the focus of the mission development suggested by World Federation for Medical Education and Liaison Committee on Medical Education medical education standards and searched for appropriate decision-making methods based on these standards. In addition to validate the suggested framework of mission statement, case analysis of medical schools was conducted.Results: Consequently, a mission development method that applies the mission statement based on stakeholders’ priority (MSSP) was derived. The MSSP involves (1) content analysis, (2) candidate extraction, (3) priority evaluation, and (4) priority validation. The keywords of the mission system derived during this process were categorized and listed in ranks to be suggested as the mission, vision, and core values. The proposed MSSP was applied in two South Korean medical schools and, thereby, the mission, vision, and core values were determined for each medical school.Conclusion: The two schools’ case analysis verified MSSP’s effectiveness as a decision-making methodology to gather and converge diverse opinions from stakeholders for the mission statement at the medical schools.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Morcke AM, "Outcome (competency)based education: an exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 18(4), pp.851~863 (2013)
  2. Spady WG, "Outcome-based education: critical issues and answers" (1994), American Association of School Administrators
  3. Harden RM, "AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 1-an introduction to outcome-based education", Med Teach, 21(1), pp.7~14 (1999)
  4. McNeil HP, "An innovative outcomes-based medical education program built on adult learning principles", Med Teach, 28(6), pp.527~534 (2006)
  5. Lockyer J, "Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education", Med Teach, 39(6), pp.609~616 (2017)
  6. Harden RM, "Outcome-based education: the ostrich, the peacock and the beaver", Med Teach, 29(7), pp.666~671 (2007)
  7. Holmboe ES, "A call to action: the controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education", Med Teach, 39(6), pp.574~581 (2017)
  8. Shaikh AS, "Significance of the transition to outcome based education: explore the future", Paper presented at: National Conference on “Quest for Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Evaluation” (2017)
  9. World Federation for Medical Education, "Basic Medical Education: WFME Global Standards for Quality Improvement: the 2015 revision", WFME Office, ~ (2015)
  10. Liaison Committee on Medical Education, "Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree", Association of American Medical Colleges, ~ (2019)
  11. MacCarrick GR, "A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards:WFME 1: mission and objectives", Ir J Med Sci, 179(4), pp.483~487 (2010)
  12. Spady WG, "Outcome-based education" (1993), Australian Curriculum Studies Association
  13. Olds GR, "Building medical schools around social missions: the case of the University of California, Riverside", Health Syst Reform, 1(3), pp.200~206 (2015)
  14. Batra S, "Social mission metrics: developing a survey to guide health professions schools", Acad Med, 95(12), pp.1811~1816 (2020)
  15. Furman GC, "School district approval for staff development:“Garbage Can” decision-making" (1986), American Educational Research Association
  16. Tamir E, "Under pressure: why school managements use garbage can model of decision?", Res Educ Adm Leadersh, 3(1), pp.1~28 (2018)
  17. Kreiner K, "Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations", pp.156~173 (1976), Universitetsforlaget
  18. Campbell RF, "Administrative behavior in education" (1957), Harper & Bros
  19. Jones MH, "Executive decision making: the Irwin series in management" (1962), Irwin
  20. Chaing C, "A behavioral model of rational choice", Competit Policy Int, 6(1), pp.241~258 (2010)
  21. Brown R, "Consideration of the origin of Herbert Simon’s theory of ‘satisficing’ (1933-1947)", Manag Decis, 42(10), pp.1240~1256 (2004)
  22. Lindblom CE, "The science of “muddling through”", Public Adm Rev, 19(2), pp.79~88 (1959)
  23. Etzioni A, "Mixed-scanning: a “third” approach to decisionmaking", Public Adm Rev, 27(5), pp.385~392 (1967)
  24. Bakanauskienė I, "Theoretical background for the decision-making process modelling under controlled intervention conditions", Organ Vadyb Sist Tyrim, (78), pp.7~19 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)