본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Voluntary peer-mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the experiences of mentors and mentees

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: We aimed to examine the participants’ satisfaction and evaluation of the program’s appropriateness, outcomes and benefits from participants’ perspectives and gather suggestions from students to improve peer mentor programs.Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 67 mentees and mentors participated in the peer mentoring program. All program participants were asked to participate in the survey, and the respondents were invited to focus group interview (FGI). Quantitative data was collected from the survey questionnaire. Qualitative data was gathered from the open-end questions in the survey and supplemented from additional semi-structured FGIs. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Results: Nineteen responded to the survey, and six participated in the further FGI. Qualitative data contained outcomes and mutual benefits, factors for mentoring success, negative experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Especially factors for mentoring success consisted of various methods of studying assistance, motivation, autonomy, responsibility, emotional support, and relational bonding as important topics concerning mentor-mentee experiences. The satisfaction scores about the program appropriateness, others’ attitudes, program implementation, ranged from 3.5 to 3.9 (5-point Likert scores) without significant difference between mentors and mentees. The only negative experience reported by a mentee was feeling the pressure. Specific guidelines on program implementation, pre-education for mentees, appropriate matching, and mentees’ clear purpose and spontaneity were suggested to improve the program.Conclusion: Participants were generally satisfied with the peer mentoring program, gaining academic and non-academic achievements, including emotional support and improved relationships. Furthermore, we expect that this program can be improved with participants’ suggestions in the future.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to examine the participants’ satisfaction and evaluation of the program’s appropriateness, outcomes and benefits from participants’ perspectives and gather suggestions from students to improve peer mentor programs.Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 67 mentees and mentors participated in the peer mentoring program. All program participants were asked to participate in the survey, and the respondents were invited to focus group interview (FGI). Quantitative data was collected from the survey questionnaire. Qualitative data was gathered from the open-end questions in the survey and supplemented from additional semi-structured FGIs. The interview data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.Results: Nineteen responded to the survey, and six participated in the further FGI. Qualitative data contained outcomes and mutual benefits, factors for mentoring success, negative experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Especially factors for mentoring success consisted of various methods of studying assistance, motivation, autonomy, responsibility, emotional support, and relational bonding as important topics concerning mentor-mentee experiences. The satisfaction scores about the program appropriateness, others’ attitudes, program implementation, ranged from 3.5 to 3.9 (5-point Likert scores) without significant difference between mentors and mentees. The only negative experience reported by a mentee was feeling the pressure. Specific guidelines on program implementation, pre-education for mentees, appropriate matching, and mentees’ clear purpose and spontaneity were suggested to improve the program.Conclusion: Participants were generally satisfied with the peer mentoring program, gaining academic and non-academic achievements, including emotional support and improved relationships. Furthermore, we expect that this program can be improved with participants’ suggestions in the future.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 안도희, "의과대학생들의 완벽주의, 성취목적 및 학문적 효능감간의 관계", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 18(2), pp.141~152 (2006), 한국의학교육학회
  2. Jeong YR, "Research trend on depression of Korean medical students: focused on dissertations and publications between 2000 and 2017", master, pp.2018
  3. Lapp H, "Peer-mentoring program during the preclinical years of medical school at Bonn University: a project description", GMS J Med Educ, 35(1), pp.Doc7~ (2018)
  4. Abdolalizadeh P, "Dual peer mentoring program for undergraduate medical students: exploring the perceptions of mentors and mentees", Med J Islam Repub Iran, 31, pp.2~ (2017)
  5. 호예담, "A study of satisfaction of medical students on their mentoring programs at one medical school in Korea", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 29(4), pp.253~262 (2017), 한국의학교육학회
  6. Kalén S, "Continuous mentoring of medical students provides space for reflection and awareness of their own development", Int J Med Educ, 3, pp.236~244 (2012)
  7. Sambunjak D, "Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review", JAMA, 296(9), pp.1103~1115 (2006)
  8. Lian CW, "Peer mentoring among undergraduate medical students: experience from Universiti Malaysia Sarawak", Educ Med J, 7(1), pp.e45~e54 (2015)
  9. Frei E, "Mentoring programs for medical students: a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008", BMC Med Educ, 10, pp.32~ (2010)
  10. Von der Borch P, "A novel large-scale mentoring program for medical students based on a quantitative and qualitative needs analysis", GMS Z Med Ausbild, 28(2), pp.Doc26~ (2011)
  11. Tan YS, "A framework for mentoring of medical students: thematic analysis of mentoring programmes between 2000 and 2015", Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 23(4), pp.671~697 (2018)
  12. Yera Hur, "Exploring the possibility of one-on-one mentoring as an alternative to the current student support system in medical education", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 30(2), pp.119~130 (2018), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
  13. Akinla O, "A systematic review of the literature describing the outcomes of near-peer mentoring programs for first year medical students", BMC Med Educ, 18(1), pp.98~ (2018)
  14. Heeneman S, "Tensions in mentoring medical students toward self-directed and reflective learning in a longitudinal portfolio-based mentoring system: an activity theory analysis", Med Teach, 39(4), pp.368~376 (2017)
  15. Hauer KE, "Medical students’ perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis", Med Teach, 27(8), pp.732~734 (2005)
  16. Sambunjak D, "A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine", J Gen Intern Med, 25, pp.72~78 (2010)
  17. 김정민, "대학생의 비교과교육과정 및 비교과졸업인증 인식에 대한 혼합연구", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 18(13), pp.245~266 (2018), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  18. 이원경, "의과대학 과정 중 제적과 군복무를 경험한 학생들에 대한 내러티브 연구", 의학교육논단, 21(2), pp.92~99 (2019), 연세대학교 의과대학[DOI]
  19. 김지영, "의과대학 소그룹 지도 프로그램 운영의 사례연구: SNU 학습멘토링, 피어튜터링, 학습코칭, 의학연구 멘토링 프로그램을 중심으로", 의학교육논단, 14(2), pp.78~85 (2012), 연세대학교 의과대학
  20. Kim MS, "Awareness of students for implementation of a peer mentoring program in a medical school", Keimyung Med J, 35(2), pp.113~121 (2016)
  21. Altonji SJ, "Perceived benefits of a peer mentoring program for first-year medical students", Teach Learn Med, 31(4), pp.445~452 (2019)
  22. Lutz G, "Enhancing medical students’ reflectivity in mentoring groups for professional development: a qualitative analysis", BMC Med Educ, 17(1), pp.122~ (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)