Medical students’ satisfaction on online flipped learning by learning styles
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in the medical students’ satisfaction on online flipped learning by the learning style. Methods: A total of 42 second-year medical students were participated in this study. As study tools, Felder and Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles and the Korean Educational Development Institute’s National Assessment of Student Engagement in Learning were utilized. Data analysis was conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis test, a nonparametric statistical method. Results: Results showed that there were statistically significant differences within active–reflective types and sensing–intuitive types. The active–reflective type has been shown to have statistically significant differences for the three effects of learning, such as problem solving and understanding, active participation, and self-directed learning attitudes. For sensing–intuitive type, active participation showed a significant difference from other effects of learning. Conclusion: The learning style is an important concept in understanding the diverse ways in which students process and absorb new information. Hence research is needed to conduct successful small group activities through online. In the future, it is necessary to find the factors that can lead to successful online classes in medical schools.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in the medical students’ satisfaction on online flipped learning by the learning style. Methods: A total of 42 second-year medical students were participated in this study. As study tools, Felder and Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles and the Korean Educational Development Institute’s National Assessment of Student Engagement in Learning were utilized. Data analysis was conducted with the Kruskal-Wallis test, a nonparametric statistical method. Results: Results showed that there were statistically significant differences within active–reflective types and sensing–intuitive types. The active–reflective type has been shown to have statistically significant differences for the three effects of learning, such as problem solving and understanding, active participation, and self-directed learning attitudes. For sensing–intuitive type, active participation showed a significant difference from other effects of learning. Conclusion: The learning style is an important concept in understanding the diverse ways in which students process and absorb new information. Hence research is needed to conduct successful small group activities through online. In the future, it is necessary to find the factors that can lead to successful online classes in medical schools.
참고문헌 (10)
- Mehta NB, "Just imagine:new paradigms for medical education", Acad Med, 88(10), pp.1418~1423 (2013)
- Angadi NB, "Effectiveness of flipped classroom as a teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students: an interventional study", J Educ Health Promot, 8, pp.211~ (2019)
- Lage MJ, "Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment", J Econo Educ, 31(1), pp.30~43 (2000)
- El-Bishouty MM, "Use of Felder and Silverman learning style model for online course design", Educ Technol Res Dev, 67(1), pp.161~177 (2019)
- Felder RM, "Learning styles and strategies", North Carolina State University, ~ (1993)
- National survey of student engagement in Korean universities, "Korean Educational Development Institute", Korean Educational Development Institute, ~ (2010)
- Abidin MJ, "Learning styles and overall academic achievement in a specific educational system", Int J Humanit Soc Sci, 1(10), pp.143~152 (2011)
- 채수진, "의과대학생의 학습유형별 성향에 따른 문제바탕학습에 대한 효과인식", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(4), pp.347~351 (2012), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Hur Y, "Different outcomes of active and reflective students in problem-based learning", Med Teach, 29(1), pp.e18~e21 (2007)
- 김미라, "의과대학생의 학습양식의 특성과 학업성취와의 관계", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 18(2), pp.133~140 (2006), 한국의학교육학회
