Education program on medical error disclosure for emergency medicine residents using standardized patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to develop a program for error disclosure for emergency medicine (EM) residents to determine its effects. Methods: Fifteen EM residents participated in 2020. The program included two-error disclosure sessions using standardized patients (SPs), a didactic lecture, and debriefing. The Kirkpatrick model was used to evaluate this program. Satisfaction scores and narrative reactions were collected (level 1). Residents were asked to choose their actions and explain reasons for the representative error cases before and after the program (level 2). After 2 months, they were asked to write their experiences of disclosing errors to real patients (level 3). The differences in the disclosing communication scores allocated by the SPs were compared between the senior and junior residents. Results: The residents’ satisfaction scores were high. Before the program, some residents chose not to disclose errors when there were no harmful sequelae at the time of the incident. After the program, opinions changed, and the residents thought that all errors should be disclosed. Before the program, most residents disclosed the errors to patients first; after the program, they would report to the hospital first to receive guidance. After 2 months, five residents reported disclosing errors to real patients. The senior residents’ total scores and the scores for “prevention of future errors” were higher. Conclusion: The residents showed confidence in error disclosure while maintaining rapport with the real patient, and some were satisfied with their disclosure approach. Our error disclosure program for EM residents had a positive effect on their behavior and attitude toward error disclosure.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to develop a program for error disclosure for emergency medicine (EM) residents to determine its effects. Methods: Fifteen EM residents participated in 2020. The program included two-error disclosure sessions using standardized patients (SPs), a didactic lecture, and debriefing. The Kirkpatrick model was used to evaluate this program. Satisfaction scores and narrative reactions were collected (level 1). Residents were asked to choose their actions and explain reasons for the representative error cases before and after the program (level 2). After 2 months, they were asked to write their experiences of disclosing errors to real patients (level 3). The differences in the disclosing communication scores allocated by the SPs were compared between the senior and junior residents. Results: The residents’ satisfaction scores were high. Before the program, some residents chose not to disclose errors when there were no harmful sequelae at the time of the incident. After the program, opinions changed, and the residents thought that all errors should be disclosed. Before the program, most residents disclosed the errors to patients first; after the program, they would report to the hospital first to receive guidance. After 2 months, five residents reported disclosing errors to real patients. The senior residents’ total scores and the scores for “prevention of future errors” were higher. Conclusion: The residents showed confidence in error disclosure while maintaining rapport with the real patient, and some were satisfied with their disclosure approach. Our error disclosure program for EM residents had a positive effect on their behavior and attitude toward error disclosure.
참고문헌 (20)
- McLennan S, "Regulating open disclosure : a German perspective", Int J Qual Health Care, 24(1), pp.23~27 (2012)
- Gallagher TH, "US and Canadian physicians’ attitudes and experiences regarding disclosing errors to patients", Arch Intern Med, 166(15), pp.1605~1611 (2006)
- Renkema E, "Conditions that influence the impact of malpractice litigation risk on physicians’ behavior regarding patient safety", BMC Health Serv Res, 14, pp.38~ (2014)
- Ock M, "Evaluating the feasibility of introducing open disclosure of patient safety incidents" (2016), University of Ulsan
- Ock M, "Perceptions of the general public and physicians regarding open disclosure in Korea : a qualitative study", BMC Med Ethics, 17(1), pp.50~ (2016)
- "Patient Safety Act"[URL]
- "Disclosure of Medical Errors", Ann Emerg Med, 70(1), pp.121~122 (2017)
- Bell SK, "Transparency when things go wrong : physician attitudes about reporting medical errors to patients, peers, and institutions", J Patient Saf, 13(4), pp.243~248 (2017)
- Mehrotra A, "Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine", pp.27~35 (2012), Wiley-Blackwell
- "Open disclosure handbook"[URL]
- Gallagher TH, "Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors", JAMA, 289(8), pp.1001~1007 (2003)
- Kim CW, "Improving disclosure of medical error through educational program as a first step toward patient safety", BMC Med Educ, 17(1), pp.52~ (2017)
- Chan DK, "How surgeons disclose medical errors to patients : a study using standardized patients", Surgery, 138(5), pp.851~858 (2005)
- Stroud L, "Skills of internal medicine residents in disclosing medical errors : a study using standardized patients", Acad Med, 84(12), pp.1803~1808 (2009)
- Kirkpatrick DL, "Evaluating training programs : the four levels" (1994), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
- Sukalich S, "Teaching medical error disclosure to residents using patient-centered simulation training", Acad Med, 89(1), pp.136~143 (2014)
- Robinson SM, "Which adverse events should be reported in an emergency department? : a Delphi study", Eur J Emerg Med, 24(2), pp.108~113 (2017)
- Gardner AK, "A cross-specialty examination of resident error disclosure and communication skills using simulation", J Grad Med Educ, 10(4), pp.438~441 (2018)
- Raper SE, "Simulated disclosure of a medical error by residents : development of a course in specific communication skills", J Surg Educ, 71(6), pp.e116~e126 (2014)
- Crimmins AC, ""To err is human"but disclosure must be taught : a simulationbased assessment study", Simul Healthc, 13(2), pp.107~116 (2018)