본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Perceptions of medical students toward assessors in interprofessional education

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

Purpose: This study aims to establish if medical students think it is fair to be assessed by nursing professors in interprofessional education (IPE) and why.Methods: Eighty-seven third-year medical students who participated in the IPE in 2022 submitted self-reflection essays. They were asked how they perceived the assessors, and 86 medical students responded to content analyses.Results: Sixty-seven students (77.9%) agreed to be assessed by nursing professors. They believed that interprofessional assessment is possible because it is an IPE. They also believed that this was an opportunity to be assessed from various perspectives. Nineteen students (22.1%) objected because the assessment criteria may be different and nursing professors would not understand the learning experiences of medical students.Conclusion: Regarding the reasons medical students oppose it, IPE developers should supplement the development of assessment criteria and understand learners’ experiences during planning assessment.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to establish if medical students think it is fair to be assessed by nursing professors in interprofessional education (IPE) and why.Methods: Eighty-seven third-year medical students who participated in the IPE in 2022 submitted self-reflection essays. They were asked how they perceived the assessors, and 86 medical students responded to content analyses.Results: Sixty-seven students (77.9%) agreed to be assessed by nursing professors. They believed that interprofessional assessment is possible because it is an IPE. They also believed that this was an opportunity to be assessed from various perspectives. Nineteen students (22.1%) objected because the assessment criteria may be different and nursing professors would not understand the learning experiences of medical students.Conclusion: Regarding the reasons medical students oppose it, IPE developers should supplement the development of assessment criteria and understand learners’ experiences during planning assessment.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. "The definition and principles of interprofessional education"[URL]
  2. Rogers GD, "International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes", Med Teach, 39(4), pp.347~359 (2017)
  3. 박귀화, "한국 의과대학•의학전문대학원의 전문직 간 교육 현황과 요구 분석", 의학교육논단, 24(2), pp.141~155 (2022), 연세대학교 의과대학
  4. Hays RB, "Selecting performance assessment methods for experienced physicians", Med Educ, 36(10), pp.910~917 (2002)
  5. Hur HK, "Patient safety interprofessional education program using medical error scenarios for undergraduate nursing and medical students in Korea", J Interprof Care (2023)[DOI]
  6. "Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016update"[URL]
  7. Norman GR, "Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity : issues of validity, efficiency and acceptability", Med Educ, 25(2), pp.119~126 (1991)
  8. Dunworth M, "Joint assessment in inter-professional education : a consideration of some of the difficulties", Soc Work Educ, 26(4), pp.414~422 (2007)
  9. Root H, "An evaluation of a reflective writing assessment within the MPharm programme", Pharm Educ, 15(1), pp.142~144 (2015)
  10. Sabus C, "Use of a virtual environment to facilitate instruction of an interprofessional home assessment", J Allied Health, 40(4), pp.199~205 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)