『불여귀(不如歸)』에 나타난 결핵의 표상과 은유
The Representation and Metaphor of Tuberculosis in Bulyeogui
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
his study is aimed to examine the representation and metaphor of tuberculosis found in Bulyeogwi. In previous studies, the metaphor of tuberculosis was divided into a romantic symbol influenced by the West and a genetic symbol as a criticism of the pre-modern society; however, this research further attempts to clarify the nature of infection, for instance, the spread of war anxiety and modern fear. This is to figure out the underlying anxiety and fear of the Japanese projected on an infectious disease, away from the existing feminist perspective focusing only on women’s sacrifice. Accordingly, this study found the followings. First, this novel depicts the third generation of soldiers during the Meiji Restoration era after the Bakuhan System, centering on Namiko, the female protagonist. All of them are armed with a military spirit centered on the Emperor and have a proud Japanese persona that represents militarism. Among them, Takeo who is currently on active duty is a representative Japanese persona on the path of militarism and shows the possibility of a self-sustaining modern era transformed according to the Japanese climate. However, he faces the limitations of the times due to the Sino-Japanese War and eventually fails to protect love. Second, young Takeo was a proud persona of Japan that was rising high with modern reform on its back while Namiko can be seen as a shadow of Japan’s collective unconsciousness that symbolizes the failure and fear of war behind it. In other words, Takeo being loyal to nationalism externally is in the same vein with Namiko conforming to familialism. Namiko’s tragic death symbolizes the sacrifices of women who, although they were winning, had to fill the absence of men and the fear and anxiety that they might lose the war - a lack of eternal victory or life. Third, the novel deals with both tuberculosis’ vertical transmission by heredity and horizontal transmission by infection, indicating that tuberculosis is a collective problem, not just an individual disease. If this is interpreted as an allegory, heredity is a fear of vertical transmission, that is, the possibility of negative transformation of traditionally handed down customs from the past to the present while infection is a horizontal transmission that can be caused at any time by space and is characterized by its development in a way that is difficult to control. The fear of heredity is great from the perspective of an outbreak, but the fear of spread is even greater from the perspective of problem solving.
Abstract
his study is aimed to examine the representation and metaphor of tuberculosis found in Bulyeogwi. In previous studies, the metaphor of tuberculosis was divided into a romantic symbol influenced by the West and a genetic symbol as a criticism of the pre-modern society; however, this research further attempts to clarify the nature of infection, for instance, the spread of war anxiety and modern fear. This is to figure out the underlying anxiety and fear of the Japanese projected on an infectious disease, away from the existing feminist perspective focusing only on women’s sacrifice. Accordingly, this study found the followings. First, this novel depicts the third generation of soldiers during the Meiji Restoration era after the Bakuhan System, centering on Namiko, the female protagonist. All of them are armed with a military spirit centered on the Emperor and have a proud Japanese persona that represents militarism. Among them, Takeo who is currently on active duty is a representative Japanese persona on the path of militarism and shows the possibility of a self-sustaining modern era transformed according to the Japanese climate. However, he faces the limitations of the times due to the Sino-Japanese War and eventually fails to protect love. Second, young Takeo was a proud persona of Japan that was rising high with modern reform on its back while Namiko can be seen as a shadow of Japan’s collective unconsciousness that symbolizes the failure and fear of war behind it. In other words, Takeo being loyal to nationalism externally is in the same vein with Namiko conforming to familialism. Namiko’s tragic death symbolizes the sacrifices of women who, although they were winning, had to fill the absence of men and the fear and anxiety that they might lose the war - a lack of eternal victory or life. Third, the novel deals with both tuberculosis’ vertical transmission by heredity and horizontal transmission by infection, indicating that tuberculosis is a collective problem, not just an individual disease. If this is interpreted as an allegory, heredity is a fear of vertical transmission, that is, the possibility of negative transformation of traditionally handed down customs from the past to the present while infection is a horizontal transmission that can be caused at any time by space and is characterized by its development in a way that is difficult to control. The fear of heredity is great from the perspective of an outbreak, but the fear of spread is even greater from the perspective of problem solving.
참고문헌 (30)
- 구인모, "지역, 장르, 매체의 경계를 넘는 서사의 역정 -『不如歸』 번안과 유성기음반 취입을 둘러싼 서사의 수용과 변용-", 사이間SAI, (6), pp.38~71 (2009), 국제한국문학문화학회
- 김연숙, "‘가정소설’의 번역과 젠더의 기획-여성번역문학사 정립을 위한 시론-", 여성문학연구, (28), pp.115~141 (2012), 한국여성문학학회
- 김종진, "도쿠토미로카(德富蘆花) ≪호토토기스(不如歸)≫에 대한 한국과 중국의 연극적 수용양상 비교연구", 중국어문논총, (38), pp.219~241 (2008), 중국어문연구회
- 김주리, "한국 근대 소설 속 결핵의 표상과 식민지의 여성 환자", 여성문학연구, (33), pp.274~275 (2014), 한국여성문학학회
- 김현주, "‘쳐다보다’의 ‘치-’의 기원에 대하여 : <호토토기스(不如歸)>와 <불여귀>의 비교를 중심으로", 아시아문화연구, 45, pp.31~55 (2017), 아시아문화연구소
- 김효순, "식민지시기 조선의 일본어문학에 나타난 결핵 표상 :시노하라 레이요(篠原嶺葉)의 『신 호토토기스(新不如帰)』와 김우진 역 『유화우』를 중심으로", 일본연구, (38), pp.9~ (2022), 글로벌일본연구원
- 권보드래, "한국․중국․일본의 근대적 문학개념 및 문학어 형성(1) - 소설 『不如歸』의 창작 및 번역․번안 양상을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 44, pp.380~ (2003), 대동문화연구원
- 권정희, "도쿠토미 로카 『호토토키스』의 번역과 번안 조중환의 『불여귀』", 민족문학사연구, 22, pp.223~253 (2003), 민족문학사연구소
- 권정희, "식민지 조선의 번역", 번안의 위치 -1910년대 저작권법을 중심으로-, 2010, pp.(28), 297~320[DOI]
- 나츠메 소세키, "문명론", pp.89~ (2004), 소명출판
- 박진영, "불여귀-일재 조중환 번역소설", pp.24~145 (2006), 보고사
- 변상숙, "일한 『불여귀(不如歸)』의 비교언어학적 연구 -역어, 문체, 표기를 중심으로 -", 日本語敎育, (85), pp.69~80 (2018), 한국일본어교육학회
- 수전 손택, "은유로서의 질병", pp.17~ (2002), 이후
- 임경택, "일본가족의 근대-일본의 근대국민국가 형성과 가족", 일본사상, (9), pp.132~ (2005), 한국일본사상사학회
- 장남호, "일본 근대의 성격", 인문학연구, 33(3), pp.345~ (2006), 인문과학연구소
- 정과리, "감염병과 인문학", pp.3~4 (2014), 강
- 탁성숙, "소설번역에 나타나는 문말표현의 양상 -『不如帰』, 『불여귀』, 『두견성』을 대상으로-", 일어일문학연구, 99(1), pp.247~270 (2016), 한국일어일문학회
- 탁성숙, "일본어 소설의 대화문 번역에 관한 연구 -『호토토기스(不如歸)』, 『불여귀』와 『두견성』을 대상으로-", 아시아문화연구, 45, pp.119~150 (2017), 아시아문화연구소
- 탁성숙, "번역에 나타나는 인칭표현의 첨가와 생략-호토토기스(不如帰)와 불여귀・두견성의 번역양상을 통하여-", 아시아문화연구, 48, pp.359~388 (2018), 아시아문화연구소
- 의 『불여귀』를 중심으로, "민족문학사연구", 2022, 47~86, pp.민족문학사연구소
- ―德富蘆花, "德富蘆花集", pp.7~50 (1927), 改造社
- 福田真人, "結核の文化史ー近代日本における病のイメージ", pp.107~ (1995), 名古屋大学出版会
- 竇新光, "近代中韓両国における明治小説『不如帰』の受容様相について : 文学体制の視点から", 海港都市硏究, (9), pp.127~145 (2014)
- 竇新光, "日中韓三国における『不如帰』で描かれた日清戦争と戦争観", 未名, (32), pp.1~24 (2014)
- 竇新光, "日中韓『不如帰』における儒教的倫理観の変容", アジア評論, (2), pp.138~153 (2020)
- 蘭蘭, "「田村俊子の文学作品における死のモチーフ:女性の肺病死を中心に」17, In 九州大学大学院比較社会文化学府比較文化研究会バージョン", 24~ (2013)
- "江川澜2011:ネットC04版" (2013)[URL]
- 杨文瑜, "日本近代小说≪不如归≫在中国的译介与传播", 博士, pp.2013
- 李炜, "论≪不如归≫在中国的译介与传播", 解放军外国语学院学报, pp.152~159 (2022)
- Jung, C. G., "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology" (1967), Taylor & Francis Ltd
