告子人性論考辨
A Textual Research on Gaozi’s Theory of Human Nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the records of Gaozi(around the 4th century BC) in Mencius as research materials, the paper makes a textual research on Gaozi’s theory of human nature. Combined with the ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts such as the thoughts of Mencius(372 BC-289 BC) and Xunzi(313 BC-238 BC), as well as the representative theories of human nature in Western philosophy, the paper analyzes the characteristics, status, and influences of Gaozi’s theory of human nature, and it also reveals the implications for the present day. Gaozi believed that human nature was the innate nature of human beings, which was driven by human instinct, namely, to discuss human nature from the natural attributes of human beings. During the pre-Qin period, Mencius and Xunzi proposed to judge human nature by the criteria of “good” and “evil”. In fact, “good” and “evil” belong to the realm of morality. The natures of “good” and “evil” change with the times and people’s subjective thoughts. In a purely natural state, there is no “good” and “evil”. Ideologists after Qin dynasty also used “good and evil” to evaluate human nature. Gaozi advocated that “there is no good and no evil in human nature”, aiming to show that human nature cannot be judged by “good” or “evil”. From the debates between Mencius and Gaozi, it can be seen that Gaozi’s theory of human nature has three characteristics. First, plasticity, namely, people will be affected by acquired external environment, education and other factors, which means the social attributes of human nature will be good or evil. Second, adaptability, that is, human beings can adapt to changes in the external environment. Third, development, which means, human nature is constantly developing and evolving. There are no works written by Gaozi himself, making it difficult to verify him and his thoughts. However, it is commendable that Gaozi’s theory of human nature was not influenced by political factors, and he discussed human nature from a very objective and straightforward perspective, which had a profound impact on future philosophical thoughts. The influences greatly enriched the discussions of human nature in the history of ancient Chinese philosophy. The enlightenments of Gaozi’s theory of human nature to present era are as follows: Firstly, people’s external behaviors should be consistent with their inner moral concepts, so that the external appearance corresponds to the inside; secondly, the unity of opposites between good and evil promotes the developments of human beings, and Gaozi’s theory of human nature has advanced the developments of ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts.
Abstract
Based on the records of Gaozi(around the 4th century BC) in Mencius as research materials, the paper makes a textual research on Gaozi’s theory of human nature. Combined with the ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts such as the thoughts of Mencius(372 BC-289 BC) and Xunzi(313 BC-238 BC), as well as the representative theories of human nature in Western philosophy, the paper analyzes the characteristics, status, and influences of Gaozi’s theory of human nature, and it also reveals the implications for the present day. Gaozi believed that human nature was the innate nature of human beings, which was driven by human instinct, namely, to discuss human nature from the natural attributes of human beings. During the pre-Qin period, Mencius and Xunzi proposed to judge human nature by the criteria of “good” and “evil”. In fact, “good” and “evil” belong to the realm of morality. The natures of “good” and “evil” change with the times and people’s subjective thoughts. In a purely natural state, there is no “good” and “evil”. Ideologists after Qin dynasty also used “good and evil” to evaluate human nature. Gaozi advocated that “there is no good and no evil in human nature”, aiming to show that human nature cannot be judged by “good” or “evil”. From the debates between Mencius and Gaozi, it can be seen that Gaozi’s theory of human nature has three characteristics. First, plasticity, namely, people will be affected by acquired external environment, education and other factors, which means the social attributes of human nature will be good or evil. Second, adaptability, that is, human beings can adapt to changes in the external environment. Third, development, which means, human nature is constantly developing and evolving. There are no works written by Gaozi himself, making it difficult to verify him and his thoughts. However, it is commendable that Gaozi’s theory of human nature was not influenced by political factors, and he discussed human nature from a very objective and straightforward perspective, which had a profound impact on future philosophical thoughts. The influences greatly enriched the discussions of human nature in the history of ancient Chinese philosophy. The enlightenments of Gaozi’s theory of human nature to present era are as follows: Firstly, people’s external behaviors should be consistent with their inner moral concepts, so that the external appearance corresponds to the inside; secondly, the unity of opposites between good and evil promotes the developments of human beings, and Gaozi’s theory of human nature has advanced the developments of ancient Chinese philosophical thoughts.
참고문헌 (41)
- 安會茹, "由<告子>管窺孟子的人性論思想", 邊疆經濟與文化, 01, pp.95~99 (2019), 黑龍江邊疆經濟學會
- 蔡陳聰, "孟, 荀人性論比較及其當代意義", 雲南社會科學, 06, pp.33~38 (2003), 雲南省社會科學院
- 陳冀, "從孟告之辯看告子思想", 孔子研究, 02, pp.32~41 (2018), 中國孔子基金會
- 陳香玲, "中西方人性觀之辨析——以人性善與人性惡爲分析路徑", 和田師範專科學校學報, 03, pp.217~218 (2007), 和田師範高等專科學校
- 戴兆國, "<孟子>“四心”義考辨", 河北學刊, 05, pp.22~26 (2016), 河北省社會科學院
- 丁爲祥, "孟子如何“道性善”?——孟子與告子的人性之辯及其不同取向", 哲學研究, 12, pp.43~48 (2012), 中國社會科學院哲學研究所
- 甘祥滿, "性善說的困難——以<孟子․告子上>爲中心", 船山學刊, 02, pp.74~80 (2018), 湖南省社會科學界聯合會
- 高巧琳, "論告子人性論的本質主義特徵", 原道, 02, pp.173~183 (2022)
- 賀善侃, "西方哲學對人性的研究", 學術月刊, 07, pp.112~113 (1995), 上海市社會科學聯合會
- 洪明超, "宋代理學兩種告子觀的對立與互動", 朱子學研究, 01, pp.282~297 (2022)
- 黃俊傑, "孟子" (2013), 生活․讀書․新知三聯書店
- 黃啟祥, "告子與孟子人性論辯之分析", 道德與文明, 01, pp.44~49 (2019), 中國倫理學會, 天津社會科學院
- 惠吉星, "荀子與中國文化" (1996), 貴州人民出版社
- 孔凡曦, "孟子與告子人性爭論的實質", 華夏文化, 02, pp.15~18 (2017), 陜西省軒轅黃帝研究會
- 李記芬, "從孟、告“生之謂性”之辯看物性與人性", 中國人民大學學報, 06, pp.75~83 (2020), 中國人民大學
- 李柯柯, "“性善”抑乎“性惡”——孟子、荀子人性觀質疑及教育反思", 教育導刊, 03, pp.80~86 (2017), 廣州市教育研究院
- 李曉春, "試論荀子對告子人性論的繼承與揚棄", 孔子研究, 04, pp.29~35 (2002), 中國孔子基金會
- 梁濤, "荀子人性論辨正——論荀子的性惡、心善說", 哲學研究, 05, pp.71~80 (2015), 中國社會科學院哲學研究所
- 劉偉, "荀子與西方“人性惡”理念的比較", 內蒙古民族大學學報(社會科學版), 06, pp.90~94 (2012), 內蒙古民族師範學院
- 劉燕, "淺議孟子的“性善論”", 昭通師範高等專科學校學報, 01, pp.9~14 (2003), 昭通學院
- 劉忠世, "試論人性的變化發展", 齊魯學刊, 04, pp.16~20 (1983), 曲阜師範大學
- 陸建華, "告子哲學的儒家歸屬", 朱子學刊, 00, pp.382~390 (2003), 上饒師範學院朱子學研究所
- 冒雲輝, "古代中西方人性善惡論比較", 東莞理工學院學報, 02, pp.22~24+33 (2005), 東莞理工學院
- 孟祥科, "西方人性理論研究綜述", 延邊黨校學報, 01, pp.16~19 (2011), 中共延邊州委黨校, 延邊州行政學院
- 沈松勤, "新譯王安石文集" (2000), 三民書局
- 王博, "論“仁內義外”", 中國哲學史, 02, pp.29~34 (2004), 中國哲學史學會
- 王力, "古漢語字典" (2000), 中華書局
- 王豔勤, "孟荀人性論之比較", 武漢職業技術學院學報, 04, pp.17~19 (2002), 武漢職業技術學院
- 王忠林, "新譯荀子讀本" (2009), 三民書局
- 魏福明, "“性不可以善惡言”——試論王安石對儒家人性論傳統的超越", 齊魯學刊, 04, pp.14~24 (2019), 曲阜師範大學
- 韋政通, "中國思想史" (2003), 上海書店出版社
- 辛正根, "孟子和荀子思想的決定性差異", 邯鄲學院學報, 01, pp.45~54 (2017), 邯鄲學院
- 徐北東, "“性無善惡論”歷史過程述評", 佳木斯教育學院學報, 04, pp.30~32 (1990), 佳木斯教育學院
- 許慎, "說文解字" (2013), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "論語譯注" (2004), 中華書局
- 楊伯峻, "孟子譯注" (2005), 中華書局
- 楊光祥, "孟子與荀子人性論之比較觀", 現代商貿工業, 08, pp.92~93 (2016), 中國商辦工業雜誌社
- 翟書俊, "東西方人性學說簡述", 網絡財富, 21, pp.237~238 (2010), 中國電源學會
- 張克政, "孟荀人性論比較", 烏魯木齊職業大學學報, 04, pp.90~94 (2005), 烏魯木齊職業大學
- 周海春, "告子人性論探析", 湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 03, pp.41~45 (2012), 湖北大學
- 朱童萍, "從告孟之辯看告子的人性思想", 重慶科技學院學報(社會科學版), 06, pp.27~28 (2011), 重慶科技學院
