Validation Study of Korean Translated Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation-15 as Self-Report Family Assessment Measure: Focusing on Adolescent in Daegu and North Gyeongsang Province
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Systemic Clinic Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15) is a compact scale that contains the most critical family function assessment tools including assessments of the strengths, adaptability, and communication among family members. It has been translated into other languages in the United States and Europe. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of SCORE-15 with a small research population and justify its applicability in Korea. Methods: SCORE-15 is a self-reporting family function measurement tool for each family member over the age of 11 years. This study used the Family Communication Scale (FCS) included in the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES) IV package and FACES in FACES-III to verify the validity of the Korean-translated SCORE-15. Cronbach’s α value was calculated to check the reliability of SCORE-15. Data were analyzed using STATA ver. 15.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Results: The study analyzed the correlation between FACES-III and SCORE-15 and FCS and SCORE-15 so that there was a significant static correlation in both comparisons (r=0.72 and r=0.81, respectively). Also, the research compared each subscale to analyze the correlation and the range was 0.47 to 0.95. The total SCORE-15 Cronbach’s α value was 0.92 and those values of the subscales for family strengths, family communication, and family difficulty were 0.89, 0.73, and 0.87, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our study was the first to validate the Korean SCORE-15, which can be used as an appropriate shortform indicator for evaluating family function and changes in detecting therapeutic improvements in Korea.
Abstract
Background: Systemic Clinic Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15) is a compact scale that contains the most critical family function assessment tools including assessments of the strengths, adaptability, and communication among family members. It has been translated into other languages in the United States and Europe. This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of SCORE-15 with a small research population and justify its applicability in Korea. Methods: SCORE-15 is a self-reporting family function measurement tool for each family member over the age of 11 years. This study used the Family Communication Scale (FCS) included in the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES) IV package and FACES in FACES-III to verify the validity of the Korean-translated SCORE-15. Cronbach’s α value was calculated to check the reliability of SCORE-15. Data were analyzed using STATA ver. 15.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Results: The study analyzed the correlation between FACES-III and SCORE-15 and FCS and SCORE-15 so that there was a significant static correlation in both comparisons (r=0.72 and r=0.81, respectively). Also, the research compared each subscale to analyze the correlation and the range was 0.47 to 0.95. The total SCORE-15 Cronbach’s α value was 0.92 and those values of the subscales for family strengths, family communication, and family difficulty were 0.89, 0.73, and 0.87, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our study was the first to validate the Korean SCORE-15, which can be used as an appropriate shortform indicator for evaluating family function and changes in detecting therapeutic improvements in Korea.
참고문헌 (20)
- Stuart MR, "The fifteen minute hour: therapeutic talk in primary care", pp.45~50 (2015), Radcliffe Publishing
- Kim SY, "Evaluation of family function in the inpatient of rehabilitation medicine department with impairment of activity of daily living", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 18, pp.336~350 (1997)
- Min HY, "Circumplex model and structural relationships among parent-adolescent communication : focusing on their adolescent children", master, pp.1990
- Lebow J, "Normal family processes: growing diversity and complexity", pp.501~528 (2012), The Guilford Press
- Sanderson J, "The measurement of outcome variables in couple and family therapy research", Am J Fam Ther, 37, pp.239~257 (2009)
- Hamilton E, "Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures", Fam Process, 55, pp.16~30 (2016)
- 김정희, "가족구성원 1인과 2인의 가족적응력 및 결속력평가척도(FACES Ⅲ) 응답 이용 시 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(5), pp.599~608 (2002), 한국간호과학회
- 이미숙, "척도 번역 과정을 중심으로 살펴본 한국어 FACES IV의 적절성에 대한 고찰", 지체.중복.건강장애연구, 57(2), pp.23~44 (2014), 한국지체·중복·건강장애교육학회[DOI]
- Olson DH, "FACES-III. St. Paul (MN): Family Social Science" (1985), University of Minnesota
- Olson DH, "Family inventories: inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle" (1982), Family Social Science, University of Minnesota
- Olson DH, "FACES IV & the Circumplex Model" (2006), Life Innovations Inc
- Evans C, "CORE : clinical outcomes in routine evaluation", J Ment Health, 9, pp.247~255 (2000)
- Stratton P, "Developing an indicator of family function and a practicable outcome measure for systemic family and couple therapy : the SCORE", J Fam Ther, 32, pp.232~258 (2010)
- Carr A, "The score family assessment questionnaire : a decade of progress", Fam Process, 56, pp.285~301 (2017)
- "The Korean Standard Classification of Occupations (KSCO): the 7th version of KSCO" (2018)[URL]
- Fay D, "Irish norms for the SCORE-15 and 28 from a national telephone survey", J Fam Ther, 35, pp.24~42 (2013)
- 김영식, "FACES IV의 가족의사소통 척도(FCS) 한국어판의 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석", 한국가족관계학회지, 17(1), pp.241~258 (2012), 한국가족관계학회[DOI]
- Vilaca M, "The 15-item Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation(SCORE-15)scale : Portuguese validation studies", Span J Psychol, 18, pp.E87~ (2015)
- Hamilton E, "Psychometric properties and responsiveness to change of 15-and 28-item versions of the SCORE : a family assessment questionnaire", Fam Process, 54, pp.454~463 (2015)
- Choi J, "Validity and reliability of Faces III ad a tool of middle school student’s family function evaluation : when student himself only responses", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 21, pp.84~90 (2000)