Relationship between Family Adaptability, Cohesion and Adolescent Problem Behaviors: Curvilinearity of Circumplex Model
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES) III using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function. However, the criticism of the curvilinear hypothesis of the circumplex model has always been from an empirical point of view. This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability,cohesion, and adolescent problem behaviors, and especially testing the consistency of the curvilinear hypotheses with FACES III. Methods: We used the data from 398 adolescent participants who were in middle school. A self-reported questionnaire was used to evaluate the FACES III and Youth Self Report. Results: According to the level of family adaptability, significant differences were evident in internalizing problems (P =0.014). But, in externalizing problems, the results were not significant (P = 0.305). Also, according to the level of family cohesion, significant differences were in internalizing problems (P = 0.002) and externalizing problems (P = 0.004). Conclusion: The relationship between the dimensions of adaptability, cohesion and adolescent problem behaviors was not curvilinear. In other words, adolescents with high adaptability and high cohesion showed low problem behaviors.
Abstract
Background: The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES) III using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function. However, the criticism of the curvilinear hypothesis of the circumplex model has always been from an empirical point of view. This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability,cohesion, and adolescent problem behaviors, and especially testing the consistency of the curvilinear hypotheses with FACES III. Methods: We used the data from 398 adolescent participants who were in middle school. A self-reported questionnaire was used to evaluate the FACES III and Youth Self Report. Results: According to the level of family adaptability, significant differences were evident in internalizing problems (P =0.014). But, in externalizing problems, the results were not significant (P = 0.305). Also, according to the level of family cohesion, significant differences were in internalizing problems (P = 0.002) and externalizing problems (P = 0.004). Conclusion: The relationship between the dimensions of adaptability, cohesion and adolescent problem behaviors was not curvilinear. In other words, adolescents with high adaptability and high cohesion showed low problem behaviors.
참고문헌 (29)
- Hamburg DA, "Preparing for life: the critical transition of adolescence", Am Psychol, 44, pp.825~827 (1989)
- Bell LG, "Family climate and the role of the female adolescent: determinants of adolescent function", Fam Relat, 31, pp.519~527 (1982)
- Jeon GY, "The influence of adolescent-perceived family cohesion, family adaptability, and family system type on adolescent adjustment, in studies in home management" (1994), Kyungpook National University
- Ahmed SM, "Psychosocial influences on health, In Textbook of family medicine", pp.24~32 (2011), Saunders
- 김종성, "가족 중심 진료의 임상 적용", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 30(6), pp.405~414 (2009), 대한가정의학회
- Hur BY, "The family-centered medical care, In Current family medicine", pp.25~31 (2007), Hankook book
- "Family adaptability and cohesion in families consisting of Asian immigrant women living in South Korea: a 3-year longitudinal study" (2013)[URL]
- "Family function of the families consisting of Asian immigrant women living in South Korea: a 3-year longitudinal study" (2012)[URL]
- Olson DH, "Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. theoretical update", Fam Process, 22, pp.69~83 (1983)
- Olson DH, "Circumplex model VII: validation studies and FACES III", Fam Process, 25, pp.337~351 (1986)
- Lim JH, "A study of reliability and validity of FACES III", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 11(10), pp.8~17 (1990)
- Green RG, "The Beavers- Timberlawn model of family competence and the circumplex model of family adaptability and cohesion: separate, but equal?", Fam Process, 24, pp.385~408 (1985)
- Choi YS., "A review of studies on Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES)", J Korean Home Manag Assoc, 14, pp.131~145 (1996)
- Kim SY, "A study of Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale II", J Korean Home Econ Assoc, 35, pp.205~219 (1997)
- Park CH, "The relationship between test anxiety and family adaptability, cohesion of high school students", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 21, pp.1534~1543 (2000)
- Han SB, "The relationship between children’s self: concepts and family systems as analyzed by the circumplex model", Child Stud Divers Context, 13, pp.145~160 (1992)
- Min HY, "The relation between juvenile deliquency and parent: adolescent communication, family cohesion and adaptability", Child Stud Divers Context, 13, pp.112~124 (1992)
- Jeon GY, "An exploratory study of developing model on family system related to adolescent adjustment", J Korean Home Econ Assoc, 34, pp.137~155 (1996)
- Smets AC, "Systems and symptoms: family cohesion", adaptability and childhood behavior problems, 1988, pp.16, 233~246
- Manne SL, "Predictors of depressive symptomatology among parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer", J Pediatr Psychol, 20, pp.491~510 (1995)
- Achenbach TM, "Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL", 4- 18, YSR, and TRF profile, 1991
- Korean Youth Self-Report (K-YSR), "Oh KJ.", Huno Consulting, ~ (2010)
- Baer JC, "Ethnic differences in trajectories of family cohesion for Mexican American and non-Hispanic white adolescents", J Youth Adolesc, 36, pp.583~592 (2007)
- Kim SY, "Relationship between marital cohesion: adaptability and communication", J Korean Home Manag Assoc, 11, pp.30~39 (1993)
- Olson DH., "Circumplex model of marital and family systems", J Fam Ther, 22, pp.144~167 (2000)
- Ko BS, "FACES III in the Korean adolescents", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 21, pp.615~624 (2000)
- Lee KS, "Validity and reliability of FACES III when applied two of family members", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 17, pp.540~553 (1996)
- Friedman AS, "Families of adolescent drug abusers are “rigid”: are these families either “disengaged” or “enmeshed,” or both?", Fam Process, 26, pp.131~148 (1987)
- Kim JH, "A study on juvenile gang in Korea", Korean Criminol Rev, (8), pp.1~363 (1991)