본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Lexical Bundles in the Korean EFL Teacher Talk Corpus: A Comparison Between Non-native and Native English Teachers

2

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The present study investigates the use of lexical bundles in Korean EFL teacher talk. In particular, it examines the quantitative and qualitative features of lexical bundles in a native and non-native teachers’ classroom talk corpus. The corpus of the study consists of a total of 247,398 words complied through 62 hours of recording of EFL classes. The key lexical bundles of the study were extracted using WordSmith 6.0 to conduct frequency, functional and structural analyses. The results of the frequency analysis showed the non-native English teachers’ repeated use of a limited number of lexical bundles which inflated the total number of usages. The functional analysis of the lexical bundles showed that the non-native English teachers relied heavily on a narrow range of functional categories, e.g., stance expressions and referential expressions. Further, the results of the functional analysis clearly indicate that the EFL teacher corpus possesses certain repetitive tendencies in both conversational and academic discourse. The examination of the over-, exclusive, and under-use of lexical bundles demonstrates that not only quantitative but also qualitative differences exist in lexical bundle preferences between the native and the nonnative teachers.

Abstract

The present study investigates the use of lexical bundles in Korean EFL teacher talk. In particular, it examines the quantitative and qualitative features of lexical bundles in a native and non-native teachers’ classroom talk corpus. The corpus of the study consists of a total of 247,398 words complied through 62 hours of recording of EFL classes. The key lexical bundles of the study were extracted using WordSmith 6.0 to conduct frequency, functional and structural analyses. The results of the frequency analysis showed the non-native English teachers’ repeated use of a limited number of lexical bundles which inflated the total number of usages. The functional analysis of the lexical bundles showed that the non-native English teachers relied heavily on a narrow range of functional categories, e.g., stance expressions and referential expressions. Further, the results of the functional analysis clearly indicate that the EFL teacher corpus possesses certain repetitive tendencies in both conversational and academic discourse. The examination of the over-, exclusive, and under-use of lexical bundles demonstrates that not only quantitative but also qualitative differences exist in lexical bundle preferences between the native and the nonnative teachers.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Baker, P., "What’s in a word-list? Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction", pp.125~136 (2009), Ashgate
  2. Biber, D., "Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers", English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), pp.263~286 (2007)
  3. Biber, D., "Out of corpora: Studies in honor of Stig Johansson", pp.181~190 (1999), Rodopi
  4. Biber, D., "If you look at… : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 25(3), pp.371~405 (2004)
  5. Biber, D., "The Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
  6. Boers, F., "Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency : Putting a lexical approach to the test", Language Teaching Research, 10(3), pp.245~261 (2006)
  7. "BNC 32" (2012)[URL]
  8. Conklin, K., "Formulaic Sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?", Applied Linguistics, 29(1), pp.72~89 (2008)
  9. Cortes, V., "Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology", English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), pp.397~423 (2004)
  10. Cortes, V., "A comparative analysis of lexical bundles in academic history writing in English and Spanish", Corpora, 3(1), pp.43~57 (2008)
  11. DeCock, S., "Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech", Belgian Journal of English Language and Literature, 2, pp.225~246 (2004)
  12. Compiling a multimodal corpus database of educational discourse in Singapore schools, "Doyle, P.", Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education, ~, pp.Report No. CRPP Project CRP 20 (2009), 04 JD[DOI]
  13. Ellis, N., "Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(1), pp.17~44 (2012)
  14. Frazier, S., "A corpus analysis of would-clauses without adjacent ifclauses", TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), pp.443~466 (2003)
  15. Granger, S., "Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications", pp.145~160 (1998), Oxford University Press
  16. Granger, S., "Towards a phraseological model of lexical proficiency: Evidence from learner corpus research", Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference of the Applied Linguistic Associations of Korea (2012)
  17. Granger, S., "eLexicography in the 21st Century: New challenges, new applications", pp.87~96 (2010), Presses universitaires de Louvain
  18. Howarth, P., "Phraseology and second language proficiency", Applied Linguistics, 19(1), pp.24~44 (1998)
  19. Hyland, K., "As can be seen : Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation", English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), pp.4~21 (2008)
  20. Jalilifar, F., "Request strategies : Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian foreign speakers", Canadian Center of Science and Education, 2(1), pp.46~61 (2009)
  21. Kemppanen, H., "Keywords and ideology in translated history texts : A corpus-based analysis", Across Languages and Culture, 5(1), pp.89~106 (2004)
  22. Krishnamurthy, R., "Language as chunks, not words", JALT 2002 Proceedings, pp.288~294 (2002)
  23. Ku, P., "An analysis of key words in tourism English", Proceedings of the 1999 English for Specific Purposes Conference, pp.232~241 (1999), Ming Chuan University
  24. Mauranen, A., "Academic discourse across disciplines", pp.271~294 (2006), Peter Lang
  25. McEnery, T., "What’s in a word-list?: Investigating word frequency and keyword extraction", pp.93~124 (2009), Ashgate
  26. Scott, M., "WordSmith tools 6.0" (2012), Oxford University Press
  27. Seal, C., "Gender, cancer experience and internet use : A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups", Social Science and Medicine, 62(10), pp.257~259 (2006)
  28. Shin, D. K., "A collocation inventory for beginners", doctoral, pp.2006
  29. Simpson-Vlach, R., "An academic formulas list : New methods in phraseology research", Applied Linguistics, 31(4), pp.487~512 (2010)
  30. Sohn, H., "Korean : Descriptive grammars" (2013), Korea University Press
  31. Tribble, C., "A taste for corpora: In honor of Sylviane Granger", pp.85~108 (2011), John Benjamins
  32. Underwood, G., "Formulaic sequences", pp.155~172 (2004), John Benjamins
  33. Wood, D., "Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech : An exploration of the foundations of fluency", Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), pp.13~33 (2006)
  34. Wray, A., "Formulaic language and the lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  35. Wray, A., "Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching", pp.123~147 (2008), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)