A Study on the Productivity Measurement and Effect Factors of Management Evaluation in Public Firms with a Focus on the Port Authorities
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we first measured the malmquist productivity index by DEA among the Korean public firms. Second, there are 12 public corporations whose productivity (MPI) has decreased compared to 2014. This is mainly because of a decrease in productivity, as well as a decrease in the technical efficiency change index (TECI), impacted by the internal environment, and the increase in productivity because of an increase in the technology change index (TCI) impacted by the external environment. Finally, the analysis of the impact on the management assessment scores showed that the productivity (MPI), scale efficiency (CRS), size of sales, operating profitability, and total capital investment efficiency are significantly related (+), except for the asset turnover, which is a static financial ratio. Meanwhile, the management evaluation scores between the high-productivity public corporations and low-performing public corporations were significantly discriminating. Thus, it is confirmed that the nation's state-run companies must manage their MPIs in a time series to score high in management evaluation.
Abstract
In this study, we first measured the malmquist productivity index by DEA among the Korean public firms. Second, there are 12 public corporations whose productivity (MPI) has decreased compared to 2014. This is mainly because of a decrease in productivity, as well as a decrease in the technical efficiency change index (TECI), impacted by the internal environment, and the increase in productivity because of an increase in the technology change index (TCI) impacted by the external environment. Finally, the analysis of the impact on the management assessment scores showed that the productivity (MPI), scale efficiency (CRS), size of sales, operating profitability, and total capital investment efficiency are significantly related (+), except for the asset turnover, which is a static financial ratio. Meanwhile, the management evaluation scores between the high-productivity public corporations and low-performing public corporations were significantly discriminating. Thus, it is confirmed that the nation's state-run companies must manage their MPIs in a time series to score high in management evaluation.
참고문헌 (14)
- 안숙찬, "공공기관의 경영평가 결과와 기관특성에 관한 연구", 대한경영학회지, 27(6), pp.835~859 (2014), 대한경영학회
- Choi, S. R., "Performance Analysis of the Public firm Evaluation System", Journal of Administration, 47(1), pp.183~208 (2009)
- 강윤호, "공기업 거버넌스 제도와 대리인 문제: 뉴욕․뉴저지 항만공사를 중심으로", 한국항해항만학회지, 33(10), pp.743~756 (2009), 한국항해항만학회
- Kim, J. K., "Performance of Public firm Management Evaluation System and Future Tasks", Korean Administration Research, 10(14) (2001)
- Kwak, C. K., "The Role and Performance of Management Evaluation System for the Control of Inefficiency of Government-invested Institutions", Journal of public firms (2003)
- Kwak, C. K., "Proposals Problems and Management Innovation of public firms", Journal of public firms (1995)
- 권세민, "지역항만 발전을 위한 항만운영기관의 역할에 관한 연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 35(5), pp.439~444 (2011), 한국항해항만학회
- 이은성, "공기업 경영평가 타당성과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 로지스틱스연구, 21(4), pp.51~65 (2013), 한국로지스틱스학회[DOI]
- Lee, H. Y., "Research methodology", pp.303~437 (2013), Cheongram
- Oh, Y. C, "A Study on the Development of the Management Evaluation System of Government-invested Institutions", Journal of public firms (2003)
- 박호철, "물류환경변화에 따른 부산항 운영사 재구성효과에 관한 실증연구", 한국항해항만학회지, 42(6), pp.507~517 (2018), 한국항해항만학회[DOI]
- Park, S. H., "Performance Management and Organizational Producitivity in the public firms", Journal of Korea Administrative Studies, 40(4), pp.511~530 (2006)
- Shin, H. M, "An Analysis of the Influence of the Management Evaluation on the Performance of public firms: Focused on the Evaluation of the Head of the Agency", master, pp.2011
- Song, D. H., "Theoretical Background and Techniques of Management Evaluation of public firms, Focus on the Management Evaluation of Government- invested Institutions", Korea Development Institute, 19~28 (1987)