독립당사자참가와 상소 - 최근의 대법원판례를 소재로 -
The Third Party Intervention and Appeal: Referring to the Recent Supreme Court Cases
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When the party who loses a suit of the third party intervention doesn’t appeal, a position of the non appeal party in such appeal process becomes a problem. On this problem, the Theory of the Party in Appeal is insisted. This theory generally discusses the trial structure in the appeal by a priori method. On the other hand, there was hardly the judicial precedent’s having handled this problem directly. However, recently two important judicial precedents that handled this problem were continuously rendered. The judicial precedent is not taking of certain one standpoint said by the theory. Oppositely the judicial precedent is a standpoint that the trial structure of the appeal is reasonably treatable in the limit union finding concerning all parties even if certain one standpoint is not taken. Consequentially, the judicial precedent is appropriate, and there is no problem in the conclusion of such precedent.
Abstract
When the party who loses a suit of the third party intervention doesn’t appeal, a position of the non appeal party in such appeal process becomes a problem. On this problem, the Theory of the Party in Appeal is insisted. This theory generally discusses the trial structure in the appeal by a priori method. On the other hand, there was hardly the judicial precedent’s having handled this problem directly. However, recently two important judicial precedents that handled this problem were continuously rendered. The judicial precedent is not taking of certain one standpoint said by the theory. Oppositely the judicial precedent is a standpoint that the trial structure of the appeal is reasonably treatable in the limit union finding concerning all parties even if certain one standpoint is not taken. Consequentially, the judicial precedent is appropriate, and there is no problem in the conclusion of such precedent.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강현중, "민사소송법 제6판" (2004)
- 김상원, "주석신민사소송법(Ⅰ)" (2004)
- 김용진, "실통본민사소송법 제4판" (2006)
- 김홍규, "민사소송법 제8판" (2005)
- 이시윤, "신민사소송법 제3판" (2006)
- 이영섭, "신민사소송법(상)" (1980)
- 전병서, "민사소송법강의 제4판" (2004)
- 정동윤, "민사소송법 제2판" (2008)
- 호문혁, "민사소송법 제 4판" (2005)
- "법원실무제요 민사소송Ⅰ", ~ (2005)
- 秋山幹男, "第2版 コンメンタ?ル民事訴訟法Ⅰ", ~ (2006)
- , 2006
- 井上治典,, "多數當事者訴訟の法理", ~ (1981)
- 上田, "注?民事訴訟法(2)", ~ (1992)
- 兼子一, "判例民事訴訟法", ~ (1950)
- 兼子一, "解民事訴訟法", ~ (1986)
- 菊井, "民事訴訟法Ⅰ", ~ (1957)
- 濟藤編, "注解民事訴訟法⑴", ~ (1968)
- 高橋宏志, "重點講義民事訴訟法 下", ~ (2004)
- 中野, "新民事訴訟法講義 第2版補訂版", ~ (2007)
- 三ヶ月章, "民事訴訟法 第3版(法律學講座?書 1992)", ~ (1992)
- 김홍규, "독립당사자참가소송에 있어서 패소한 2당사자의 일방이 상소할 경우 상소하지 아니한 他 일방의 상소심에 있어서의 지위, 법률신문 제1440호", ~
- 이시윤, "독립참가, 고시계1974", 9, 1974
- 이시윤, "독립당사자참가소송⑴, 사법행정1966", 8, 1966
- 이재성, "독립당사자참가소송과 민소법 제63조의 준용", 사법행정, 23(5) (1982)
- 井上治典, "獨立當事者參加, 新實務民事訴訟法3(1982)", ~ (1982)
- 倉田卓次, "高裁判例硏究, 判例タイムズ128?(1962)" (1962)
- 小島武司, "?立?事者?加をめぐる若干の問題, ?務民事訴訟法⑴(1969)", ~ (1969)
- 鈴木正裕, "判批", 民商法, 63(3) (1970)
- (1988), , 1988
- 丹野達, "三面訴訟における一部の者のみの上訴, 三ヶ月章=?山善充編, 民事訴訟法の?点(1979)", ~ (1979)
- (1998), , 1988