회생절차 관련 도산법 개정 동향 - 자동중지와 절대우선의 원칙에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -
Recent Developments in the Discussion on Reforming Rehabilitation Procedure under the Korean Insolvency Act
1
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The issue of whether to adopt the concepts of “automatic stay” and “absolute priority rule” into the rehabilitation regime has been hotly and persistently debated among bankruptcy scholars and practitioners in Korea and still being so over the expert panel discussion on amending the Korean Insolvency Act being held under the auspice of the Ministry of Justice. This article sets forth the basic justifications for adopting those concepts and refutes certain well-known arguments submitted against such adoption. The apprehension that the automatic stay mechanism could be abused by those debtors who intend to seek temporary debt suspension or to avoid criminal punishment under the Illegal Check Control Act is misplaced. The argument that the absolute priority rule will do harm in attaining such policy goals as mitigating conflicts between the debtholders and the equityholders, inducing early bankruptcy filings, and encouraging new value contribution is at most doubtful.
참고문헌 (7)
- 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상)(제2판)" (2008), 박영사
- 오수근, "도산법개혁 1998-2007" (2007), 두솔
- 이화여자대학교 도산법연구센터, "도산법제 선진화를 위한 비교법제 연구", ~ (2008)
- Adler, Barry E., "Bankruptcy and Risk Allocation", Cornell L. Rev., 77, pp.439~ (1992)
- Adler, Barry E., "The Law of Last Resort", Vand. L. Rev., 55, pp.1661~ (2002)
- Jackson, Thomas H., "Bankruptcy, Non-Bankruptcy Entitlements, and the Creditors' Bargain", Yale L.J., 91, pp.857~ (1982)
- Schwartz, Alan, "A Normative Theory of Business Bankruptcy", Va. L. Rev., 91, pp.1199~ (2005)