기업회생절차에서 자동중지제도의 도입에 관한 소고
Discussion on Introducing Automatic Stay to Corporate Reorganization Proceedings
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Today’s reorganization proceedings added the order of comprehensive prohibition to the Corporate Reorganization Act that institutionalized provisional remedy and individual stay order so as to preclude any voluntary payment by debtors and any action by creditors to collect before the court order commenced. Reorganization proceedings, on the other hand, commands comprehensive stay order against all creditors, forbidding via law all unsecured and secured creditors from executing any individual action or attempt to collect. Furthermore, when the Revised Bill of Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act was proposed in the National Assembly in 2011, it was suggested to partially adopt Automatic Stay from the Bankruptcy Act in U.S Federal Law. Automatic Stay prohibits all voluntary payment by debtors and all actions by creditors to collect once bankruptcy petition is filed; thus requires no separate stay order from the court. This serves to expedite the petition process and to precipitate economic recovery of the debtor, and is conducive to fair allocation of payment to the creditors, leading to their satisfaction. Introduction of Automatic Stay is deemed beneficial to the debtor’s recovery because stay order becomes effective at the moment of the filing of bankruptcy petition rather than the court’s approval or the court’s order of provisional remedy or stay order, which would take place later in time. The 18th National Assembly attempted to legislate Automatic Stay; however it is currently on halt as of June 2012 with the Assembly’s term having reached termination. Ministry of Government Legislation proclaimed that it is to pursue the legislation. This paper discusses several legal recourses to regulate unsecured or secured creditors from undertaking any action to collect prior to the court’s approval of bankruptcy petition, which is permitted under the current reorganization proceedings. Furthermore, the author has reviewed the details of Automatic Stay as part of the Revised Bill of Debtor Rehabilitation and its impact on South Korea.
Abstract
Today’s reorganization proceedings added the order of comprehensive prohibition to the Corporate Reorganization Act that institutionalized provisional remedy and individual stay order so as to preclude any voluntary payment by debtors and any action by creditors to collect before the court order commenced. Reorganization proceedings, on the other hand, commands comprehensive stay order against all creditors, forbidding via law all unsecured and secured creditors from executing any individual action or attempt to collect. Furthermore, when the Revised Bill of Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act was proposed in the National Assembly in 2011, it was suggested to partially adopt Automatic Stay from the Bankruptcy Act in U.S Federal Law. Automatic Stay prohibits all voluntary payment by debtors and all actions by creditors to collect once bankruptcy petition is filed; thus requires no separate stay order from the court. This serves to expedite the petition process and to precipitate economic recovery of the debtor, and is conducive to fair allocation of payment to the creditors, leading to their satisfaction. Introduction of Automatic Stay is deemed beneficial to the debtor’s recovery because stay order becomes effective at the moment of the filing of bankruptcy petition rather than the court’s approval or the court’s order of provisional remedy or stay order, which would take place later in time. The 18th National Assembly attempted to legislate Automatic Stay; however it is currently on halt as of June 2012 with the Assembly’s term having reached termination. Ministry of Government Legislation proclaimed that it is to pursue the legislation. This paper discusses several legal recourses to regulate unsecured or secured creditors from undertaking any action to collect prior to the court’s approval of bankruptcy petition, which is permitted under the current reorganization proceedings. Furthermore, the author has reviewed the details of Automatic Stay as part of the Revised Bill of Debtor Rehabilitation and its impact on South Korea.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김경욱, "2005年 美國聯邦破産法上消費者破産制度의主要改正內容과 그 意味", 민사소송, 9(2), pp.266~313 (2005), 한국민사소송법학회
- 김성용, "회생절차 관련 도산법 개정 동향 - 자동중지와 절대우선의 원칙에 관한 논의를 중심으로 -", 비교사법, 16(4), pp.67~94 (2009), 한국비교사법학회
- 金載亨, "統合 倒産法案의 主要爭點", 비교사법, 10(1), pp.38~76 (2003), 한국비교사법학회
- 김재형, "회사정리법, 화의법, 파산법의 개정내용과 장래의 과재", 한국법학원보, (78), pp.4~ (1998)
- 김현석, "미국기업파산법" (2005), 고시계사
- 김형두, "통합도산법의 과제와 전망(Ⅱ)", 저스티스, (85), pp.21~61 (2005), 한국법학원
- 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상) 제3판" (2011), 박영사
- 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "도산절차와 소송 및 집행절차" (2011), 박영사
- 법무부, "채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률 해설" (2006)
- 법무부, "채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률 개정 공청회", ~ (2011)
- 법무부, "2010년 채무자회생 및 파산에 관한 법률개정 자료집", ~ (2012)
- 유해용, "통합도산법 시행 이후 한국의 기업회생 실무와 쟁점", 법조, 59(2), pp.82~132 (2010), 법조협회
- 윤영신, "미국의 도산법, In 주요국의 도산법(II)" (1998), 한국법제연구원
- 김은정, "회생절차개시 전 채무자 재산보전방안에 관한 연구 -자동중지제도의 도입을 중심으로-", 기업법연구, 25(1), pp.127~169 (2011), 한국기업법학회
- 이제정, "美國 聯邦倒産法의 自動停止 制度에 관한 小考", 저스티스, (122), pp.127~164 (2011), 한국법학원
- 이진만, "한국에서의 도산법의 개정", 민사소송, 7(2), pp.56~82 (2003), 한국민사소송법학회
- 이혜리, "자동정지제도에 관한 연구 - 자동정지제도 도입의 필요성을 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, (372), pp.56~72 (2007), 대한변호사협회
- 임채홍, "회사정리법(상)" (2002), 사법행정학회
- 정동윤, "상법(하), 제3판" (2008), 법문사
- 福岡真之介, "アメリカ聯邦倒産法槪說", 商事法務 (2008)
- "9B American Jurisprudence, Bankruptcy, Second Edition, § 1961, § 1962", ~
- Crocker, Randall D., "Fundamental Changes: Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005", The Wisconsin Lawyer, 78, pp.14~ (2005)
- Epstein, David G., "Principles of Bankruptcy Law", pp.2007, Thomson
- Ferriell, Jeff, "UNDERSTANDING BANKRUPTCY 2nd ed" (2007), LexisNexis
- Martin, Nathalie, "Insidie Bankruptcy Law 2nd ed" (2011), Wolters Kluwer
- Murphy, John Francis, "The Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy", Clev. St. L. Rev, 34, pp.567~ (1986)
- Warren, Elizabeth, "THE LAW OF DEBTORS AND CREDITORS 4th ed" (2001), ASPEN
