본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의사표시에 기한 계약관계의 종료에 관한 고찰 - 근로계약에서 사전약정, 합의해지, 기간의 정함을 중심으로 -

Study on the Conclusion of Contract Relations by Declaration of Intention - With focus on prior agreement, termination by agreement and term limit in the labor contract -

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The purpose of this article is to examine the conclusion of contract relations under the Civil Act and labor law by looking at the conclusion thereof based on declaration of intention. In order to compare to the two, review will be made by focusing on employment contract under the Civil Act and labor contract similar thereto. As the relevant conclusion of labor contract relations, this article looked at the conclusion by automatic retirement provisions, i.e., at the prior agreement,termination by agreement and term limit. Where such conclusion of contract relations by declaration of intention is made based on the declaration of intention by either party or both parties, the labor contract relations are understood to end in the area of private autonomy. Such intent is thus respected, and there occurs the legal effect of concluding the contract relations based on the intent. Problems occur when some employers attempt to avoid relevant restricting provisions of the labor contract which protect the workers, under the excuse of the principle of private autonomy. Here, the relationship between such limiting provisions and private autonomy will be considered through the conclusion of contract relations by declaration of intention. First of all, making the limit of the conclusion of contract relations clear by initially clarifying the meaning of relevant declaration of intention in the conclusion of contract relations inherent or deemed inherent in such declaration of intention will be the interpretation promoting the purpose of statutory provisions protecting contract parties in terms of private autonomy and from social perspectives. For that, based on the position of the court and majority scholars that void legal transactions can also be cancelled, this article examined the relationship of prior agreement, termination by agreement and term limit with the provisions on declaration of intention, with those restricting dismissal, etc

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the conclusion of contract relations under the Civil Act and labor law by looking at the conclusion thereof based on declaration of intention. In order to compare to the two, review will be made by focusing on employment contract under the Civil Act and labor contract similar thereto. As the relevant conclusion of labor contract relations, this article looked at the conclusion by automatic retirement provisions, i.e., at the prior agreement,termination by agreement and term limit. Where such conclusion of contract relations by declaration of intention is made based on the declaration of intention by either party or both parties, the labor contract relations are understood to end in the area of private autonomy. Such intent is thus respected, and there occurs the legal effect of concluding the contract relations based on the intent. Problems occur when some employers attempt to avoid relevant restricting provisions of the labor contract which protect the workers, under the excuse of the principle of private autonomy. Here, the relationship between such limiting provisions and private autonomy will be considered through the conclusion of contract relations by declaration of intention. First of all, making the limit of the conclusion of contract relations clear by initially clarifying the meaning of relevant declaration of intention in the conclusion of contract relations inherent or deemed inherent in such declaration of intention will be the interpretation promoting the purpose of statutory provisions protecting contract parties in terms of private autonomy and from social perspectives. For that, based on the position of the court and majority scholars that void legal transactions can also be cancelled, this article examined the relationship of prior agreement, termination by agreement and term limit with the provisions on declaration of intention, with those restricting dismissal, etc

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2007), 박영사
  2. 김유성, "노동법 I" (2005), 법문사
  3. 김주수, "채권각론" (1997), 삼영사
  4. 김증한, "채권각론" (1988), 박영사
  5. 김용담, "민법주해(Ⅲ)" (2002), 박영사
  6. 김형배, "채권각론《계약법》" (2001), 박영사
  7. 김형배, "노동법" (2010), 박영사
  8. 유성재, "판례노동법" (2008), 법문사
  9. 이은영, "채권각론" (2007), 박영사
  10. 임종률, "노동법" (2010), 박영사
  11. 하경효, "노동법사례연습" (2008), 박영사
  12. 권혁, "해고서면주의", 경영법률, 19(4), pp.513~541 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  13. 김동훈, "청약과 승낙이론의 몇 가지 문제점", 고시계, 99 (1999)
  14. 김영신, "계속적 계약관계의 해지에 관한 연구", 법학, pp.2008
  15. 김용균, "근로자의 퇴직 의사표시의 철회의 허용여부", 대법원판례해설, 통권 : 17 (1993), 법원행정처
  16. 박흥대, "사직원의 철회", 판례연구, 5 (1995), 부산판례연구회
  17. 최흥섭, "근로계약의 합의해지와 민법 제527조", 민사법학, 통권 : 13 (1996), 한국민사법학회
  18. 하경효, "계속적 계약관계에서의 해지", 사법연구, 9 (2004), 법영사
  19. 하경효, "채무불이행과 계약해제의 요건 -유책성 요건에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로-", 고려법학, (40) (2003), 고려대 법학연구원
  20. 한범주, "명예퇴직 신청의 철회(대법원 2003.4.25. 선고 2002다11458 판결 : 공2003상, 1254)", 대법원판례해설, (44) (2004), 법원도서관
  21. 홍일표, "사직원 제출을 둘러싼 문제점의 고찰", 인천법조, 4 (1998), 인천지방변호사회
  22. 노동부, "노사관계선진화입법 설명자료", ~ (2007)
  23. 법무부, "성년후견제 도입을 위한 민법개정안 공청회 자료", ~ (2009)
  24. 중앙노동위원회, "분기별 주요판례분석(09-3)", ~ (2009)
  25. Annuß·Thüsing, "Maschmann, Teilzeit- und BefristungsG", ~ (2002)
  26. Bauer, "Arbeitsrechtliche Aufhebungsverträge, 8. Aufl", ~ (2007)
  27. Bengelsdorf, "Der gesetz- und verfassungswidrige Zugriff auf die arbeitsrechtliche Beendigungs- freiheit", pp.193~ (1994), NZA
  28. Freedland, "The personal employment contract" (2006), Oxford university press
  29. Larroumet, "Les Obligations, Le Contrat(Tome III)" (2003), Economica
  30. Lavanchy, "Jurisprudence sociale" (2005), Droit du travail
  31. Palandt, "Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, 67.Aufl", ~ (2008)
  32. Pélissier, "Droit du travail", ~ (2004)
  33. Tilse, "Beendigung des Arbeitsverhältnisses durch Kündigung oder Aufhebungsvertrag", ~ (2007)
  34. 菅野和夫, "勞働法" (2008), 弘文堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)