유럽사법(私法)통합의 현황과 시사점 - 유럽의 공통참조기준초안(Draft Common Frame of Reference)에 관한 논쟁을 관찰하며 -
The Present State of the Integration of European Private Law and Lessons therefrom - Observing Controversies on the Draft Common Frame of Reference -
0
조회
0
다운로드
32
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Draft Common Frame of Reference is the academic work, prepared by two research groups at the delegation of the European commission, containing principles, definitions and model rules of European private law. This impressive work is not only significant in the realm of European private law, but also in the context of Korean private law as well, which has constantly been influenced by European private law. Although it is good to be acquainted with the contents of the DCFR, it is equally important to understand where DCFR stands in the past,present, and the future of European private law. For some years, DCFR has been the focus of huge controversy in various aspects. Its relationship to the idea of the European Civil Code, the solidness of the common legal infrastructure of the European private law on which it stands, and its position as to the fundamental values of the private law have especially been subject to fierce controversy. Apart from the debate concerning these issues, the European Union is pressing forward with the next idea of “Instrument of the European Contract Law”, based on the contract law part of the DCFR, which will significantly affect the future of the European Contract law. Anyhow, DCFR will be remembered as a huge leap in the road to the integration of European private law. The contract law part is likely to serve as the meaningful stepping stone to the integration of European contract law, while the other parts are likely to remain as a mere academic work that might benefit future efforts in its kind. A close observation on the process of making DCFR and the controversy that followed also gives us some implications that we need to dwell on. Among these implications, I have argued that expansion of the role of the comparative analysis, competition between legal regimes, and the emerging significance of the fundamental values of private law are particularly noteworthy.
Abstract
Draft Common Frame of Reference is the academic work, prepared by two research groups at the delegation of the European commission, containing principles, definitions and model rules of European private law. This impressive work is not only significant in the realm of European private law, but also in the context of Korean private law as well, which has constantly been influenced by European private law. Although it is good to be acquainted with the contents of the DCFR, it is equally important to understand where DCFR stands in the past,present, and the future of European private law. For some years, DCFR has been the focus of huge controversy in various aspects. Its relationship to the idea of the European Civil Code, the solidness of the common legal infrastructure of the European private law on which it stands, and its position as to the fundamental values of the private law have especially been subject to fierce controversy. Apart from the debate concerning these issues, the European Union is pressing forward with the next idea of “Instrument of the European Contract Law”, based on the contract law part of the DCFR, which will significantly affect the future of the European Contract law. Anyhow, DCFR will be remembered as a huge leap in the road to the integration of European private law. The contract law part is likely to serve as the meaningful stepping stone to the integration of European contract law, while the other parts are likely to remain as a mere academic work that might benefit future efforts in its kind. A close observation on the process of making DCFR and the controversy that followed also gives us some implications that we need to dwell on. Among these implications, I have argued that expansion of the role of the comparative analysis, competition between legal regimes, and the emerging significance of the fundamental values of private law are particularly noteworthy.
참고문헌 (54)
- 박영복, "EU사법", pp.1~ (2009)
- 현대 계약법의 과제, "박영복", ~ (2009)
- 권영준, "민사재판에 있어서 이론, 법리, 실무", 서울대학교 법학, 49(3), pp.313~354 (2008), 법학연구소
- 김진우, "최근 유럽민사법의 발전동향 - 공통참조기준초안과 소비자권리지침초안을 계기로 하여", 법학연구, 50(2), pp.345~375 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김상중, "유럽계약법 공통참조기준 초안 (Draft Common Frame of Reference)에 따른 채무불이행법과 그 시사점", 법학연구, 50(2), pp.37~81 (2009), 법학연구소
- 위계찬, "공통참조요강초안(Draft Common Frame of Reference)의 인적담보에 관한 연구", 외법논집, 33(2), pp.27~87 (2009), 법학연구소
- 정소민, "신탁의 설정에 관한 소고 - 공통참조기준초안(Draft Common Frame of Reference)을 중심으로", 외법논집, 33(3), pp.49~79 (2009), 법학연구소
- "Basedow", Hopt, pp.2009, ~
- Christian von Bar, "Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law; Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR)" (2009), Full Edition
- David J. Hayton, "Principles of European Trust Law" (1999)
- European Group on Tort Law, "Principles of European Tort Law, Text and Commentary" (2005)
- Hugh Collins, "The European Civil Code-The Way Forward" (2008)
- Martin Schmidt-Kessel, "Der gemeinsame Referenzrahmen: Entstehung, Inhalte" (2009), Anwendung
- Nils Jansen, "Beyond the State: Rethinking Private Law" (2008)
- Ole Lando, "Principles of European Contract Law, Part Ⅰ and Ⅱ" (2000)
- Ole Lando, "Principles of European Contract Law, Part Ⅲ" (2003)
- Oliver Remien, "Schuldrechtsmodernisierung und Europäisches Vertragsrecht" (2008)
- Pierre Larouche, "Economic Analyisis of the DCFR" (2010)
- Restatement of European Insurance Contract Law, "Project Group", Principles of European Insurance Contract Law, ~ (2009)
- Research Group on the Existing EC Private Law (Acquis Group), "Principles of the Existing EC Contract Law (Acquis Principles), Contract Ⅰ - Pre-Contractual Obligations, Conclusion of Contract, Unfair Terms", ~ (2007)
- Research Group on the Existing EC Private Law (Acquis Group), "Principles of the Existing EC Contract Law (Acquis Principles), Contract Ⅱ -Delivery of Goods, Package Travel and Payment Service", ~ (2009)
- Rudolf B. Schlesinger, "Comparative Law, 6th ed" (1998)
- Antoni Vaquer, "Legal Concepts Present and Absent from the Draft Common Frame of Reference(DCFR)", E.R.P.L, 17, pp.4~ (2009)
- B. Fauvarque-Cosson, "Common Frame of Reference, The Work of the Group of the “Association Henri Capitant des Amis de la Culture Juridique Francaise” and of the “Société de legislation comparée”(AHC-SLC)", ZEuP, 3, pp.648~ (2008)
- Barbara Pasa, "The DCFR, the ACQP and the Reactions of Italian Legal Scholars", E.R.P.L, 18, pp.227~ (2010)
- Bernhard Jakl, "The European Law Days: The Academic Draft Common Frame of Reference from a German Perspective", E.R.P.L, 2, pp.261~ (2009)
- "Canaris, Wandlungen des Schuldvertragsrechts-Tendenzen zu seiner “Materialisierung”, Archiv für die zivilistische Praxis", ~ (2000)
- Christian von Bar, "Die Study Group on a European Civil Code, in Peter Gottwald" (2000), Festschrift für Dieter Heinrich
- Christian von Bar, "A Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law - Academic Efforts and Political Realities", Tul. Eur. & Civ. L.F, 23, pp.37~ (2008)
- Claire Moore Dickerson, "OHADA On the Ground: Harmonizing Business Law in Three Dimensions", Tul. Eur. & Civ. L.F, 25, pp.103~ (2010)
- Christian Twigg-Flesner, "Gerhard Dannemann, Language and Terminology" (2010), European Union Private Law
- Gerhard Wagner, "Vom akademischen zum politischen Draft Common Frame of Reference", ZEuP, 4, pp.676~ (2008)
- Gerhard Wagner, "Die soziale Frage und der Gemeinsame Referenzrahmen", ZEuP, 1, pp.180~ (2007)
- Hans Schulte-Nölke, "Die Acquis Principles (ACQP) und der Gemeinsame Referenzrahmen: Zu den Voraussetzungen einer ertragreichen Diskussion" (2008), Kontroversen und Perspektiven
- Hans Schulte-Nölke, "Arbeiten an einem Europäischen Vertragsrecht: Fakten und populäre Irrütumer", NJW, pp.2161~ (2009)
- Horst Eidenmüller, "The Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law - Policy Choices and Codification Problems", Oxford J. Legal Stud, 28, pp.659~ (2008)
- Jan Peter Schmidt, "Der “juridical act” im DCFR: Ein nützlicher Grundbegriff des europäischen Privatrechts", ZEuP, 2, pp.304~ (2010)
- Joachim Zekoll, "Das American Law Institute - ein Vorbild für Europa" (2008), Geltung und Genese
- Jürgen Basedow, "Kodifikationsrausch und kollidierende Konzepte - Notizen zu Martkbezug, Freiheit und System im Draft Common Frame of Reference", ZEuP, 4, pp.674~ (2008)
- Jürgen Basedow, "Ein europäisches Vertragsrecht kommt - aber zu welchem Preis", Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2010)
- Lord Jonathan Mance, "The Common Frame of Reference", ZEuP, 3, pp.457~ (2010)
- Martijn Hesselink, "The Common Frame of Reference as a Source of European Private Law", Tulane L. R, 83, pp.919~ (2009)
- "A Toolbox for European Judges" (2010)[URL]
- Mauro Bussani, "The Common Core Approach to European Private Law", Colum. J. Eur. L, 3, pp.339~ (1997)
- Nils Jansen, "A European Civil Code in All but Name, Discussing the Nature and Purpose of the Draft Common Frame of Reference", C.L.J, 69, pp.99~ (2010)
- Ole Lando, "The Structure and the Legal Value of the Common Frame of Reference(CFR)", E.R.C.L, 1, pp.244~ (2007)
- Stefan Grundmann, "The Structure of the DCFR - Which Approach for Today's Contract Law", E.R.C.L, 1, pp.225~ (2008)
- Stefan Grundmann, "European Contract Law(s) of What Colour", E.R.C.L, 1, pp.184~ (2005)
- Stefan Vogenauer, "Common Frame of Reference and UNIDROIT Principles", E.R.C.L, 6, pp.182~ (2010)
- Study Group on Social Justice in European Private Law, "Social Justice in European Contract Law: A Manifesto", Eur. L.J, 10, pp.653~ (2004)
- Susanne Lepsius, "Taking the Institutional Context Seriously, In Beyond the State: Rethinking Private Law" (2008)
- Ugo Mattei, "A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance", Ind. J. Global Legal Stud, 10, pp.383~ (2003)
- W. Tilmann, "Entschließung des Europäischen Parlaments über die Angleichung des Privatrechts der Mitgliedstaaten vom 26.05.1989", ZEuP, 1, pp.613~ (1993)
- Wolfgang Ernst, "Zur Struktur des CFR" (2009), Entstehung, Inhalte, Anwendung