債權讓渡에 대한 異議를 保留하지 않은 承諾과 諸抗辯의 承繼ㆍ切斷效
Consent to an Assignee without Reservation by an Obligor and his Succession of, and Divorce from a Refutation
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean Civil Code provides that the assignment of a nominative claim cannot be set up against an obligor or any other third party, unless an assignor has given notice thereof to an obligor or the obligor has consented thereto. Regarding the legal effect of the Article 451, Paragraph 1, lots of arguments has been raised because an obligor's ‘consent to an assignee without reservation’ may raise problematic issues with regard to public trust and estoppel. It has been admitted by Korean as well as Japanese courts that when an obligor gives consent to an assignee without reservation, he cannot set up his refutation that he had against the assignor, also against the assignee. This estoppel prohibiting the obligor from setting up his refutation has been provided for the purpose of promoting nominative claim transactions and also of affording protection to the assignee. Consequently, it has been recognised that the public trust has been given on the consent without reservation made by the obligor. As such this article explored and examined various problems, arising out of the invalidity, cancelation, termination of a contract when an obligor makes ‘consent to assignee without reservation’. Futhermore, this article attempted to resolve those problems by scrutinizing the relevant authorities and arguments made by a group of scholars in Korea as well as Japan.
Abstract
The Korean Civil Code provides that the assignment of a nominative claim cannot be set up against an obligor or any other third party, unless an assignor has given notice thereof to an obligor or the obligor has consented thereto. Regarding the legal effect of the Article 451, Paragraph 1, lots of arguments has been raised because an obligor's ‘consent to an assignee without reservation’ may raise problematic issues with regard to public trust and estoppel. It has been admitted by Korean as well as Japanese courts that when an obligor gives consent to an assignee without reservation, he cannot set up his refutation that he had against the assignor, also against the assignee. This estoppel prohibiting the obligor from setting up his refutation has been provided for the purpose of promoting nominative claim transactions and also of affording protection to the assignee. Consequently, it has been recognised that the public trust has been given on the consent without reservation made by the obligor. As such this article explored and examined various problems, arising out of the invalidity, cancelation, termination of a contract when an obligor makes ‘consent to assignee without reservation’. Futhermore, this article attempted to resolve those problems by scrutinizing the relevant authorities and arguments made by a group of scholars in Korea as well as Japan.
참고문헌 (42)
- 곽윤직, "제7판" (2002), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "제6판" (2002), 박영사
- 김기선, "한국채권법총론 제3전정판" (1987), 법문사
- 김준호, "민법강의 제16판" (2010), 법문사
- 김형배, "민법학강의 제8판" (2008), 신조사
- 명순구, "프랑스 민법전" (2004), 법문사
- 양창수, "독일민법전 총칙ㆍ채권ㆍ물권" (2008), 박영사
- 이영준, "전정판" (1996), 박영사
- 지원림, "민법강의" (2008), 홍문사
- 김선석, "지명채권양도의 증명책임", 사법논집, 23
- 서민, "채권양도에 대한 소고(상)", 법조, 31(11) (1982), 법조협회
- "2001", 민사례연구회
- 近江幸治, "民法講義 Ⅳ(債權法總論)" (2000), 成文堂
- 近藤英吉, "註釋日本民法(債權編總則)" (1936), 巖松堂
- 內田 貴, "民法 Ⅲ 債權總論ㆍ擔保物權" (2006), 東京大學出版會
- 大村敦志, "基本民法 Ⅲ 債權總論ㆍ擔保物權" (2007), 有斐閣
- 石坂音四郞, "日本民法債權總論 上中下合本" (1924), 有斐閣
- 星野英一, "民法槪論Ⅲ(債權總論)" (1978), 良書普及會
- 松板佐一, "民法提要債權總論" (1982), 有斐閣
- 我妻 榮, "新訂債權總論(民法講義 Ⅳ)" (1964), 岩波書店
- 我妻 榮, "コンメンタ-ル 民法 總則ㆍ物權ㆍ債權" (2006), 日本評論社
- 安達三季生, "債權總論講義" (2000), 信山社
- 於保不二雄, "債權總論" (1972), 有斐閣
- 奧田昌道, "債權總論" (1992), 悠悠社
- 柚木 馨, "判例債權法總論" (1951), 有斐閣
- 柚木 馨, "債務法" (1988), 有斐閣
- 柚木馨, "補正 判例債權法總論" (1971), 有斐閣
- 中川善之助, "註釋民法(11)債權(2)" (1974), 有斐閣
- 池田眞朗, "債權讓渡の硏究" (2004), 弘文堂
- 平井宜雄, "法律學講座双書 債權總論" (2007), 弘文堂
- 橫田秀雄, "債權總論" (1908), 淸水書店
- 木村一八郞, "民法 468條 2項における特殊問題の硏究", 民商法雜誌, 10(4)
- 安達三季生, "指名債権譲渡における異議を留めない承諾，再論-池田真朗教授および石田・西村両教授の批判に答えて", 法学志林, pp.3~141 (1992)
- 吾妻光俊, "抵當權の讓渡と 債權讓渡の承諾", 法學新報, 44(9), 中央大學
- Cheshire, "Fifoot and Furmston's Law Of Contract" (2006), Oxford University Press
- G.H. Treitel, "The Law Of Contract｣10th edit" (1999), Sweet & Maxwell
- Marx Kaser, "Römiches Privatrecht｣Ein Studienbuch. 10. verbesserte Auflage, C.H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, München", ~ (1977)
- Marx Kaser, "ロ-マ私法槪說" (1979), 創文社
- Philip R. Wood, "INTERNATIONAL LOAN, BONDS, AND SECURITIES REGULATION" (1995), Sweet & Maxwell
- Philip R. Wood, "Law And Practice Of International Finance" (1980), Sweet & Maxwell
- Pollack, , History of English Law
- Steven L. Schwarcz, "Structured Finance" (2006), Practicing Law Institute