본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

미국에 있어서의 소송대체적 분쟁해결제도- 증권분쟁을 중심으로 -

US Securities Arbitration as Alternative Dispute Resolution

심영
한국사법학회 (The Korean Association of Private Law)|2004.06|비교사법 (The Journal of Comparative Private Law)|제11권 제2호|pp. 531-565

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ADR중재ArbitrationAlternative dispute resolution중재규칙증권분쟁사전중재약정통일중재규칙Securities dispute
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

The Commission on Judicial System Reform in the Korea's Supreme Court has decided to discuss subject on alternative dispute resolution(ADR) system in 2004. This article introduces the US ADR system, especially securities arbitration for helping Korea's judical system reform in the area of securities disputes. In US ADR refers to the various methods by which disputes are settled outside the court system. ADR offers many advantages. It usually entails fewer costs and allows disputes to be resolved relatively quickly. It also offers the advantages of privacy and flexibility. Arbitration is widely regarded by the legal community as a useful method of alternative dispute resolution. The standard justification for the existence and usefulness of arbitration as an alternative system of dispute resolution is that it is a quicker and cheaper method of resolving disputes than litigation. In the US securities industry, most brokerage firms require their customers to sign standard-form printed agreements containing arbitration clauses as a condition of opening an account, and most customer- broker disputes are subject to arbitration agreements. The securities self-regulatory organizations(SROs), such as NASD and NYSE, provide arbitration services for their members and the customers. Therefore most securities disputes are resolved by the SROs' arbitration system. The Chapter Two presents US ADR system in general for the better understanding of US securities arbitration. The Chapter Three evaluates the developments and backgrounds of US securities arbitration system. The Chapter Three also analyses the US securities arbitration procedures. The Chapter Five suggests the Korea needs to consider the arbitration as ADR in the securities disputes.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. "중재계약에 관한 연구" (2001)
  2. "금융시장에서의 중재", 299 (2001)
  3. "증권분쟁의 해결수단으로서의 증권중재", 22(1) (2003)
  4. "미국의 증권중재제도", 9(4) (2002)
  5. "Cutting the Knot:The Use of ADR in Texas Agencies", 3 (2002)
  6. "Making It up as They Go Along:The Role of Law in Securities Arbitration" (2002)
  7. "The Mini-Trial and Summary Jury Trial 52 Alabama Lawyer" (1991)
  8. "Early Neutral Evaluation: An Experimental Effort to Expedite Dispute Resolution", 69 (1986)
  9. "Securities Arbitration: Bankrupt, Bothered & Bewildered", 7 (2002)
  10. "West's Business Law" (2001)
  11. "Curing Crib Death: Emerging Growth Companies, Nuisance Suits, and Congressional Proposals for Securities Litigation Reform", 32 (1995)
  12. "Securities Arbitration: Actions Needed to Address Problem of Unpaid Awards" (2000), GAO
  13. "Securities Arbitration: How Investors Fare" (1992), GAO
  14. "SICA: The First Twenty Years", 23 (1996)
  15. "The Resolution of Securities Disputes", 6 (2001)
  16. "Generating Precedent in Securities Industry Arbitration.", 19 (1991)
  17. "NASD Arbitration of Securities Disputes" (2003), Bench and Bar Minnesota
  18. "The Unclear "Clear and Unmistakable" Standard: Why Arbitrators, Not Courts, Should Determine Whether a Securities Investor's Claim Is Arbitrable", 54 (2001)
  19. "Making Securities Arbitration Work", 50 (1996)
  20. "Government-to-Citizen Online Dispute Resolution:A Preliminary Inquiry", 79 (2004)
  21. "First Options, Consent to Arbitration, and the Demise of Separability: Restoring Access to Justice for Contracts with Arbitration Provisions", 56 (2003)
  22. "Securities Arbitration Reform: Report of the Arbitration Policy Task Force to the Board of Governors" (1996), National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc
  23. "Elements of a Fair and Efficient Securities Arbitration System", 40 (1998)
  24. "ADR in the Courts: Progress, Problems, and Possibilities", 108 (2003)
  25. "Twelfth Report" (2003), SICA

관련 논문AI추천

미국의 증권중재제도한철한국사법학회 · 비교사법2002 · 제9권 제4호미국의 재판외 분쟁해결제도김태한한국중재학회 · 중재연구2004 · 제13권 제2호미국에서의 복수당사자 중재에 관하여김상균법학연구소 · 원광법학2009 · 제25권 제1호증권분쟁의 해결수단으로서의 증권중재한철한국상사법학회 · 상사법연구2003 · 제22권 제1호증권중재에 있어서 중재인과 법원의 역할한철과학기술법연구원 · 과학기술법연구2005 · 제11권 제1호미국의 증권중재제도에 관한 소고 - 공정성 요건을 중심으로 -김희철한국중재학회 · 중재연구2008 · 제18권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)

보험계약조건의 변경- 2003년 일본 보험업법의 개정을 중심으로 -김선정pp. 17-48物件要件論 小考최경진pp. 49-82민법 제368조의 유추적용과 후순위담보권자의 보호: 대판 2002.7.12,2001다53264 ; 대판2002.10.8,2002다34901의 비판제철웅pp. 83-112法定解除의 效果에 관한 硏究 - 要件論과 관련하여 -이진기pp. 113-144獨逸民法上 賣渡人의 瑕疵擔保責任에 있어서의 '瑕疵'의 槪念임건면pp. 145-174
원문 보기