株主總會 運營上의 問題點과 그 改善方案
A Proposal for Management Improvement of General Shareholders’ Meeting under the Commercial Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the stock company, the general shareholders’ meeting that is the highest decision-making system has various functions(i.e., the control of management, the concentration of stockholders’ wish, corporate decision-making etc.). The convocation of this general shareholders’ meeting shall be determined by the board of directors unless otherwise provided by the Commercial Law, the notice for convocation of a general meeting shall be dispatched in writing or by an electronic documents which shall state the subject-matters of the meeting to each shareholder at least two weeks prior to the date set for such meeting, and if the company has issued bearer share certificate, it shall give public notice stating its intention that the general meeting is to be held and the subject-matters of the meeting, at least three weeks prior to the date set for such meeting. Shareholders who hold no less than 3/100 of the total outstanding shares other than nonvoting shares may propose to make a subject matter of a general shareholders’s meeting to directors in writing at least six weeks prior to the date set for such meeting, and who holder no less than 3/100 of the total outstanding shares may demand the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting, by submitting to the board of directors a written statement of the proposed subject-matters of the meeting together with the reasons for the proposed convocation. And Shareholders may exercise their voting rights in writing in lieu of attending the general meeting, in this case notice for the convocation of the general meeting shall be accompanied by reference materials and documents necessary for shareholders to exercise their voting rights. But there are many problems(i.e., exercise of voting right in written, demand for convocation of general meeting by minority shareholders, proxy for voting right, electronic documents, shareholders’ right to make proposal, convocation procedure of general shareholders’ meeting, decision-making of general shareholders’ meeting etc.) concerning provisions on the management of general shareholders’ meeting. In this paper, thus, I investigated the problems of the provisions on the management of general shareholders’s meeting and proposed the reform measures for settlement of such problems under the Commercial Law and the Securities and Exchange Act.
Abstract
In the stock company, the general shareholders’ meeting that is the highest decision-making system has various functions(i.e., the control of management, the concentration of stockholders’ wish, corporate decision-making etc.). The convocation of this general shareholders’ meeting shall be determined by the board of directors unless otherwise provided by the Commercial Law, the notice for convocation of a general meeting shall be dispatched in writing or by an electronic documents which shall state the subject-matters of the meeting to each shareholder at least two weeks prior to the date set for such meeting, and if the company has issued bearer share certificate, it shall give public notice stating its intention that the general meeting is to be held and the subject-matters of the meeting, at least three weeks prior to the date set for such meeting. Shareholders who hold no less than 3/100 of the total outstanding shares other than nonvoting shares may propose to make a subject matter of a general shareholders’s meeting to directors in writing at least six weeks prior to the date set for such meeting, and who holder no less than 3/100 of the total outstanding shares may demand the convocation of an extraordinary general meeting, by submitting to the board of directors a written statement of the proposed subject-matters of the meeting together with the reasons for the proposed convocation. And Shareholders may exercise their voting rights in writing in lieu of attending the general meeting, in this case notice for the convocation of the general meeting shall be accompanied by reference materials and documents necessary for shareholders to exercise their voting rights. But there are many problems(i.e., exercise of voting right in written, demand for convocation of general meeting by minority shareholders, proxy for voting right, electronic documents, shareholders’ right to make proposal, convocation procedure of general shareholders’ meeting, decision-making of general shareholders’ meeting etc.) concerning provisions on the management of general shareholders’ meeting. In this paper, thus, I investigated the problems of the provisions on the management of general shareholders’s meeting and proposed the reform measures for settlement of such problems under the Commercial Law and the Securities and Exchange Act.
참고문헌 (53)
- 곽관훈, "전자문서에 의한 주주총회 소집통지", 企業法硏究, 11 (2002), 韓國企業法學會
- 權奇範, "現代會社法論" (2001), 三知院
- 권종호, "서면투표제도,과연 입법상의 성과인가", 상사법연구, 19(2) (2000), 한국상사법학회
- 권재열, "소수주주권의 법리-그 행사요건의 완화에 대한 검토를 중심으로-", 商事法硏究, 22(2) (2003), 韓國商事法學會
- 권재열, "주주총회의 전자화", 比較私法, 10(2) (2003), 韓國比較私法學會
- 김건식, "미국의 증권규제" (2001), 홍문사
- 金相圭, "證券去來法上의 少數株主權保護規定의 評價", 人權과 正義, (277) (1999), 大韓辯護士協會
- 김재범, "주주총회 운영의 개선과제", 商事判例硏究, 16 (2004), 韓國商事判例學會
- 박상근, "인터넷시대의 회사법을 위한 일시론-한국과 독일의 관련법개정을 중심으로-", 법학, 43(1) (2002), 서울대학교
- 박상근, "인터넷과 주주총회", 법학, 42(1) (2001), 서울대학교
- 朴相祚, "新會社法論(第3增補版)" (2000), 螢雪出版社
- 산업자원부, "전자거래 관련 법령의 체계화 방안에 관한 연구", ~ (2003)
- 徐憲濟, "사례중심체계 會社法" (2000), 法文社
- 孫珠璨, "商法(上)(第13訂增補版)" (2002), 博英社
- 양만식, "서면투표제도와 전자투표에 관한 문제점과 해결방안", 상사판례연구, 16 (2004), 한국상사판례학회
- 오수근, "집중투표제", 人權과 正義, (270) (1999), 大韓辯護士協會
- 李基秀, "會社法學(第4版)" (1997), 博英社
- 이문지, "집중투표에 의한 이사선임의 득과 실", 上場, 292 (1999), 한국상장회사협의회
- 이범찬, "商法(上)(제3판)" (2002), 삼영사
- 李哲松, "會社法講義(第14版)" (2007), 博英社
- 李哲松, "전자거래기본법의 개정방향(전자문서를 중심으로)", 인터넷법률, (5) (2001), 법무부
- 李哲松, "現代會社의 所有 및 支配槪念의 變化" (1991), 한국개발연구원
- 林在淵, "證券去來法(改訂2版)" (2004), 박영사
- 정경영, "상장법인의 특례규정에 관한 입법적 과제", 한국상사법학회, 한국기업법학회, pp.법무부 공동학술대회 발표자료집, 2007
- 정경영, "주주제안제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 상사판례연구, 16 (2004), 韓國商事判例學會
- 鄭東潤, "會社法(第7版)" (2001), 法文社
- 정용상, "주주총회의 활성화론", 재산법연구, 10(1) (1993), 한국재산법학회
- 정준우, "상법과 증권거래법상의 소수주주권과 그 문제점", 漢陽法學, 21 (2007), 漢陽法學會
- 정준우, "證券去來法上의 商法特例規定에 관한 批判的 檢討", 企業法硏究, 21(2) (2007), 韓國企業法學會
- 정준우, "商法上 株主 및 會社의 書面行爲의 電子化方案", 比較私法, 10(3) (2003), 韓國比較私法學會
- 정준우, "株主提案權의 行使要件과 그 問題點", 商事法硏究, 21(3) (2002), 韓國商事法學會
- 鄭燦亨, "會社法講義(第2版)" (2002), 弘文社
- 鄭燦亨, "주주총회 활성화를 위한 제도개선 방안", 商事法硏究, 23(3) (2004), 韓國商事法學會
- 증권선물거래소, "증권선물", ~ (2006)
- 蔡利植, "商法講義(上)(改訂版)" (1996), 博英社
- 崔基元, "新會社法論(第11大訂版)" (2001), 博英社
- 최현주, "주식회사 기관운영의 전자적 방법 도입에 관한 법적 연구-주주총회의 운영을 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2006
- 한국상장회사협의회, "12월 결산 주권상장법인 2007년도 정기주주총회의 이슈와 시사점", 월간상장, (389) (2007)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "상장회사 주주총회 백서", ~ (2006)
- 한국상장회사협의회, "2006년도 주권상장법인 정관기재 유형조사 및 분석", 월간상장, (379) (2006)
- 황찬현, "전자문서의 민사증거법상의 문제", 법조, (516) (1999), 법조협회
- "KOSPI 200대 기업 올해 주주총회 개최일, 데이터뉴스", ~ (2006)
- 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社ㆍ有限會社法" (2005), 有斐閣
- 北澤正啓, "提案權行使株主の持株要件充足の時期", 證券代行ニュス, 200 (1986)
- 上柳克郞, "新版 注釋會社法(5)", pp.有斐閣, 鴻常夫
- 永田 均, "株主總會運營における社員株主役割論への覺書", 法學新報, 107(7*8) (2000), 中央大學校
- Eric A, "The Shareholder Proposal Rule: A Change to Certainty" (1992), 60 Geo.L.Rev.
- Melvin A. Eisenberg, "The Structure of the Corporation, Little" (1976), Brown and Company, Boston and Toronto
- Reinhardt, "Dietrich Schultz, Gesellschaftsrecht, 2 Aufl." (1981), J.C.B Mohr, T?ingen
- Robert W. Hamilton, "Corporations, 3rd ed" (1988), West Publishing Co
- Stephen M.Bainbridge, "The Board of Directors as Nexus of Contracts" (2002), 88 Iowa Law Rev.
- Stephen M. Bainbridge, "Corporation Law and Economics" (2002), New York Foundation Press
- Walter Mahler, "The Growth of the Korean Capital Market" (1990), Finance and????? Development